We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySophia Gonzales
Modified over 3 years ago
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Host Identification and Location Decoupling: A Comparison of Approaches Bruno Magalhães Martins Antônio Marcos Alberti
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Outline 1. Motivation 2. Approaches for Host ID/Loc Splitting 3. Comparison 4. Conclusion
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Motivation Current IP address identification + location (overload). This limitates mobility, multihoming, scalability, etc. Future networks need to separate identifiers (ID) from locators (Loc) the so called ID/Loc splitting. Why ID/Loc splitting? To move hosts without loss of identity.
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Approaches for Host ID/Loc Splitting Mobile IP HIP (Host Identity Protocol) LISP (Locator ID Separation Protocol) MILSA (Mobility and Multihoming Supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture) Akari MCP (Mobility Control Protocol)
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Mobile IP Idea: Two IP addresses: Home-address static; works as an ID for app. layer; Care-of-address dynamic; according to nodes location. Two components: Home-agent atributes home-address; mantains mapping to current location; Foreign-agent atributes care-of-address; informs home-agent. Identification: Home-Address Location: Care-of-Address
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Mobile IP
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 HIP (Host Identity Protocol) Idea: New namespace between network and transport layers: Host ID Layer Identification: Host Identifier Public key as a flat name; provides unique IDs; Location: IP address. Without HIPWith HIP
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 LISP (Locator ID Separation Protocol) Idea: Address mapping between edge and core IP networks; IP over UDP over IP; two IP addresses: EIDs (Endpoint Identifiers) persistent; used as an ID; RLOCs (Routing Locators) used to locate edge routers. Two components: ITR (Ingress Tunnel Router) maps EIDs on RLOCs; ETR (Egress Tunnel Router) maps RLOCs on EIDs. End Host Identification/Location: EIDs Edge Router Identification/Location: RLOCs
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 LISP (Locator ID Separation Protocol)
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 MILSA (Mobility and Multihoming Supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture) Idea: Separation of trust relations, called domains, and the relations of connectivity, called zones; Separation between signaling and data plan. RZBS (Zone Bridging Realm Server) - provides dynamic mapping between IDs and locators. Identification: Assigned at domain level; Location: Assigned at zone level;
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 MILSA (Mobility and Multihoming Supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture) Domains m Zones
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Akari Idea: New namespace between network and transport layers: ID Layer. Identification: By name and/or by identifier (ID) obtained by hash function; Legible and unique local names; Includes hierachical topology information in global names; Location: IP, non-IP, post-IP.
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Akari Local Name Global Name ID Locator Hash Function +IMS Domain Name Identification Location Source: Akari Prpject
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 MCP (Mobility Control Protocol) Idea: New namespace between network and transport layers: HID-based Communication Layer. Identification: HIDs (Host Identifiers) hash function of hosts proprietary public key. Location: Two protocols: ADP (Access Delivery Protocol); BDP (Backbone Delivery). Application/Transport HID-based Communication Network Delivery (ADP/BDP)
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Comparison Hash function
© Antônio M. Alberti 2011 Conclusion ID/Loc splitting is one of the most important solutions to address some of the current Internet limitations. Legible names are important to people. Approaches need to support post-IP designs. We need to evaluate the introduction of new layers. We need more holistic and integrated designs: To cover relationships among identifiers, names, locators and routing. To improve security and trust. To integrate with information ID/Loc splitting.
COM555: Mobile Technologies Location-Identifier Separation.
COM594: Mobile Technologies Location-Identifier Separation.
Why do current IP semantics cause scaling issues? −Today, “addressing follows topology,” which limits route aggregation compactness −Overloaded IP address.
Session 5C, 16 June 2011 Future Network & Mobile Summit 2011 Copyright 2011 Mobile Oriented Future Internet HINLO: An ID/LOC Split Scheme for Mobile Oriented.
I. Matta 1 On the Cost of Supporting Multihoming and Mobility Ibrahim Matta Computer Science Boston University Joint work with Vatche Ishakian, Joseph.
An ID/locator split architecture for future networks Ved P. Kafle, Hideki Otsuki, and Masugi Inoue, National Institute of Information and Communications.
I. Matta1 On the Cost of Supporting Mobility and Multihoming Vatche Ishakian, Ibrahim Matta, Joseph Akinwumi Computer Science Boston University.
HOST IDENTITY PROTOCOL 1. What is HIP ● A multi-addressing and mobility solution for the Internet ● Also a security protocol for authentication and encryption.
Hierarchical Routing Architecture Introduction draft-xu-rrg-hra-00.txt Routing Research Group Xiaohu XU
Re-thinking Security in Network Mobility Jukka Ylitalo Ericsson Research NomadicLab NDSS '05 Workshop - February 2.
1. 2 Routing Scalability Mobility Security Contents/Users Centric Manageability Quality of Services.
Mar del Plata, Argentina, 31 Aug – 1 Sep 2009 ITU-T Kaleidoscope 2009 Innovations for Digital Inclusion Ved P. Kafle, Hideki Otsuki, and Masugi Inoue National.
DMAP : Global Name Resolution Services Through Direct Mapping Tam Vu, Akash Baid WINLAB, Rutgers University (Joint.
IP Services over Bluetooth: Leading the Way to a New Mobility Markus Albrecht Matthias Frank Peter Martini Markus Schetelig Asko Vilavaara Andre Wenzel.
Host Mobility for IP Networks CSCI 6704 Group Presentation presented by Ye Liang, ChongZhi Wang, XueHai Wang March 13, 2004.
NEtwork MObility By: Kristin Belanger. Contents Introduction Introduction Mobile Devices Mobile Devices Objectives Objectives Security Security Solution.
Ασύρματες και Κινητές Επικοινωνίες Ενότητα # 10: Mobile Network Layer: Mobile IP Διδάσκων: Βασίλειος Σύρης Τμήμα: Πληροφορικής.
INTRODUCTION WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY BECOMING HOTTER WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY BECOMING HOTTER TRANSITION TOWARDS MOBILITY OVER PAST 20 YEARS TRANSITION TOWARDS.
IPv6 in UMTS IPv6 in UMTS IP in UMTS Addressing Migration IPv6 over the air Mobility Support Presentation Outline.
Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Future Network: Mobility Tae-Wan You ETRI, Joint ITU-T SG 13 and ISO/JTC1/SC 6 Workshop on Future Networks.
LISP Mobile-Node draft-meyer-lisp-mn-05.txt Chris White, Darrel Lewis, Dave Meyer, Dino Farinacci cisco Systems EID: RLOC: IRTF MobOpts.
IETF82, TAIWAN Meilian LU, Xiangyang GONG, Wendong WANG
Naming Examples UUID (universal unique ID) – 128 bit numbers, locally generated, guaranteed globally unique Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) – URL (uniform.
LISP, SDN, and OpenDaylight Vina Ermagan, Lori Jakab Cisco Systems.
Practical Considerations for Securely Deploying Mobility Will Ivancic NASA Glenn Research Center (216)
미래인터넷의 이동 네트워크 구조 연구 동향 한국기술교육대학교 한연희 (Youn-Hee Han)
Thomas Dietz The Host Identity Protocol (HIP). © NEC Europe Ltd Outline Motivation History The HIP Solution The Basic Idea Socket Bindings HIP.
1 Naming for Internet MMLAB, Seongil Han
Performance Evaluation of Path Cost Improvement in Inter-Layer 3 Networking with ID/Locator Separation Architecture Graduate School of Engineering, Kansai.
: MobileIP. : r Goal: Allow machines to roam around and maintain IP connectivity r Problem: IP addresses => location m This is important for efficient.
Outline Introduction to Application Layer Peer-to-peer paradigm Client-server paradigm Domain Name System (DNS) Flat-naming vs hierarchical-naming.
Fabric: A Retrospective on Evolving SDN Presented by: Tarek Elgamal.
Backbone Support for Host Mobility: A Joint ORBIT/VINI Experiment Jennifer Rexford Princeton University Joint work with the ORBIT team (Rutgers) and Andy.
An Update on Multihoming in IPv6 Report on IETF Activity RIPE IPv6 Working Group 22 Sept 2004 RIPE 49 Geoff Huston, APNIC.
Resolving the Transport “Tussle” Recursive InterNetwork Computer Science Boston U. 1.
IPNL: A NAT-Extended Internet Architecture Francis & Gummadi Riku Honkanen.
LISP Deployment Scenarios Darrel Lewis and Margaret Wasserman IETF 76, Hiroshima, Japan.
1 An Update on Multihoming in IPv6 Report on IETF Activity IPv6 Technical SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.
Lecture 14 Mobile IP. Mobile IP (or MIP) is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard communications protocol that is designed to allow mobile.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Web Applications. This chapter gives an overview of the Internet, and where the World Wide Web fits in. It then outlines the.
Petteri Sirén. Content Preface Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) How LISP works Methods how LISP was studied Test cases Result Summary.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. LISP Mobility.
Mobile IP: enable mobility for IP-based networks CS457 presentation Xiangchuan Chen Nov 6, 2001.
1 Chapter 3: Multiprotocol Network Design Designs That Include Multiple Protocols IPX Design Concepts AppleTalk Design Concepts SNA Design Concepts.
RRG Recommendation IETF77 March 26, 2010.
RIPE Berlin – May, 2008 Vince Fuller (for Dino, Dave, Darrel, et al) LISP: Intro and Update
I2ComM 2008 Colombia, Cartagena February 22 Next Generation Internet Architectures: Current Status and Challenges Fábio Luciano Verdi University of Campinas.
Mobile IP How Mobile IP Works? Agenda What problems does Mobile IP solve? Mobile IP: protocol overview Scope Requirements Design goals.
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Architecture & Protocols LISP Team: Vince Fuller, Darrel Lewis, Eliot Lear, Scott Brim, Dave Oran, Elizabeth McGee,
1 Chapter Overview Subnet. What is a subnet When you break a network into a few smaller networks, you have created several subnets Like IP address where.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.