We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJack Coughlin
Modified over 2 years ago
Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal (LAC ) Toshiyuki Hosaka Working Group on the policy for IPv4 address exhaustion, Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) May 23, 2007 LACNIC-X, Isla Margarita, Venezuela
1 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Introduction This proposal is : –to respond in an orderly way to the upcoming exhaustion of the IPv4 free address space. –to ensure that LIRs can receive IPv4 address allocation until pre-determined date (T-date). This proposal does not : –intend to artificially drive up IPv4 addresses –promote IPv6
2 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. How much IPv4 address left? Source : Geoff Huston - IPv4 address space report RIR pool IANA pool 48 /8s left 2010 March 2010 Nov. Actual recordProjection Consumption rate 2004 : 9 * / : 13 * / : 10 * / : 7 * /8 (As of )
3 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Current Problems The final date of IPv4 allocations is ambiguous –LIRs do not consider IPv4 address exhaustion as an imminent issue –They will face confusions such as re-addressing their network or making subsequent requests at the last minute within a limited time (last minutes rush) –LIRs will be forced to build networks with a big architectural change either with hierarchical NAT or with IPv6, or even with another solution in a very short timeframe
4 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Proposal principles 1.Global Synchronization 2.Set and announce the date when the IPv4 allocation is terminated 3.Not change the current address policy for the extension of IPv4 address lifetime 4.Separate discussions on recycle issue
5 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Proposal principles (cont.) 1.Global Synchronization –All 5 RIRs should proceed at the same time for measures on IPv4 address exhaustion –Ensuring fairness across the regions –Prevent confusion such as an attempt to receive allocations from an RIR outside their region 2.Set and announce the date when the IPv4 allocation is terminated –To ensure all LIRs/ISPs can receive IPv4 allocation until such date –Also, to give time to LIRs/ISPs to prepare for the network re-configuration (Large-scale-NAT, IPv6, or other technical solution)
6 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Proposal principles (cont.) 3.Not change the current address policy for the extension of IPv4 address lifetime –Making large changes in the current policy towards conservation is difficult in reality 4.Separate discussions on recycle issue –Recovery of unused address space is very important and should be addressed, but should not be tied with this proposed policy
7 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Details of the proposal Announce the day in which the IANA pool becomes less than 30*/8 (A-Date) Terminate new allocation/assignment from RIR on the day (T-Date) exactly 2 years after A-Date (Now)(A-Date)(T-date) 2 years No new allocation/assignment Allocation/assignment based on current policy IANA pool got less than 30* /8 Some /8 IANA pool may be left
8 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Benefits Final date of IPv4 allocation is clearly demonstrated well in advance (2 years) –LIRs and users can prepare for the exhaustion (subsequent allocation, renumbering, business plan, IPv6 etc.) –RIRs can make the last allocation and avoid causing feelings of unfairness among LIRs
9 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Discussion in APNIC Consensus reached: –Global Synchronization –Not change the current address policy for the extension of IPv4 address lifetime –Separate discussions on recycle issue Consensus NOT reached: –Set and announce the date when the IPv4 allocation is terminated Back to ML for further discussion
10 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Discussion in ARIN Public Policy Meeting resulted in few in favor(4/93) and many against(47/93) Broad comments on this policy… –Inappropriate action Artificial measures to move IPv6 Anti-trust issue - Denial of Service by the dominant supplier It is enough if Community stays informed of size of remained space –Influence by the exhaustion Issue of reclaiming the unused legacy space Emergence of trade market
11 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Other RIRs RIPE NCC –Introduced in RIPE 54 (May 2007) –Back to ML for further discussion AfriNIC –Introduced in AfriNIC 6 (May 2007) –Informational presentation with no decision
12 Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. Gracias!
LACNIC Policy Update Roque Gagliano LACNIC. Current Policies Proposals - LACNIC As a result of the Open Policy Forum at LACNIC XI four policy proposals.
Copyright (c) 2006 Japan Network Information Center Comments from JP on “End site allocation policy for IPv6” (prop-033-v001 ) Izumi Okutani Japan Network.
Policy SIG report 29 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Toshiyuki Hosaka Randy Bush Jian Zhang.
Proposal-062: Use of Final /8 Jonny Martin, Philip Smith & Randy Bush Policy APNIC 26 28th August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand.
Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Distribution of the last piece IPv4 address block in APNIC region Japan Network Information Center Izumi.
© AfriNIC – IPv6 in Africa How Africa is preparing for IPv6 Adiel A. Akplogan CEO, AfriNIC iWeek, Johannesburg, 18 September 2008.
Geoff Huston, APNIC March 2006 APRICOT 2006 IPv4 Numerology.
IPv4 Consumption and transition to IPv6 LACNIC Campaign Latinamerica and the Caribbean in IPv6 1/1/11 6 th CIF, Oct Port of Spain, TT.
RIPE Network Coordination Centre Axel Pawlik LACNIC X, 22 May 2007, Isla Margarita IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to RIRs.
Analysis of the impact of IPv4 transfer policies; Issues and solutions Dawit Bekele & John Schnizlein Internet Society AfriNIC-9 Mauritius.
What happened to IPv5? and other oft asked IPv6 questions The Internet Society, IPv6 and You Susan Estrada.
IPv4 Consumption and transition to IPv6 LACNIC Campaign Latinamerica and the Caribbean in IPv6 1/1/11 CITEL–CCP1, March 2008 Washington DC, USA.
Large Space IPv4 Trial Usage Program for Future IPv6 Deployment ACTIVITIES UPDATE Aug. 29, 2001 Kosuke Ito IPv6 Promotion Council of Japan.
Just what are we doing about this IPv6 transition? Geoff Huston APNIC
1 Current Counter-measures and Responses by the Domain Name System Community Paul Twomey President and CEO 22 April 2007 APEC-OECD Malware Workshop Manila,
IPv6 Public Policy Considerations Houlin Zhao Deputy Secretary-General International Telecommunication Union Houlin Zhao Deputy Secretary-General International.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
IPv6 allocations to closed networks LACNIC VI Mar 29 – Apr 1, 2004 Montevideo, Uruguay.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC APNIC 24, September 2007.
Axel Pawlik. LACNIC VI, March 2004, Montevideo. An RIR in 2010 History, Continuity and Future presented by: Axel Pawlik.
ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.
Update about the “SHOULDs Analysing Project” in RIPE Policy Documents “Should” we use the RFC 2119 Defined Language in RIPE Policy Documents? Jan Žorž,
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Paul Wilson, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Major Activities in JPNIC Since APNIC17 Izumi Okutani Japan Network Information Center NIR 18, Fiji 31 August – 3 September, 2004.
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited Geoff Huston March 2004 Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston APNIC R&D August
Routing Table Status Report November 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.