1. Institutional Cyberinfrastructure Joan K. Lippincott Coalition for Networked Information

2. A Time of Great Change  Technology environment  Scholarly communication  Student style/skills  Way people work  Expectations

3. For research, teaching & learning, we are dependent on:  High speed networks  Computer equipment  Access to print and digital content  Tools and software  Support from knowledgeable staff  Technology-enabled facilities

4. Working together, these form the  Institutional Cyberinfrastructure

5. NSF Report on Cyberinfrastructure

6. NSF and Cyberinfrastructure “The emerging vision is to use cyberinfrastructure to build more ubiquitous, comprehensive digital environments that become interactive and functionally complete for research communities in terms of people, data, information, tools, and instruments that operate at unprecedented levels of computational, storage, and data transfer capacity.” Report of the NSF Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure

7. ACLS Cyberinfrastructure Report

8. EDUCAUSE Campus Initiative

9. Technology  Networks  Hardware  Software  Tools  “Last mile”

10. Visualization tools site

11. Data for Visualization

12. NCSA Evolution Highway Genome Project

13. Geospatial Center - U. Virginia

14. GMU History Tools

15. Content  New forms of scholarly communication  Large-scale digitization projects  New forms of search  Libraries’ role in digitization, management & preservation

16. U. Virginia Valley of the Shadow

17. Columbia U. CCNMTL Shakespeare Primary Sources

18. CCNMTL Human Rights Resource

19. Willliams College Afghan Project

20. Publishing Environment for 19th Century Scholarship

21. Article in Vectors http://vectors.iml.annenberg.edu/

22. Content for IPods

23. Google Library Project

24. Open Content Alliance

25. NCSU Library Catalog

26. U. Minnesota Undergrad Page

27. Cornell’s VIVO

28. Facilities  Wired classrooms  Wired social spaces  Information commons  Computer labs  Multi-media production studios  Experimental spaces

29. McCann-Erickson, Views of Multi-Purpose Room, Rockwell Group. Design for multi-uses Henry Myerberg

30. Flexible classroom  Flexible furniture  Wall displays  Networked laptops  Video cameras and microphones Stanford U. Wallenberg Hall

31. Dickinson College Classroom

32. U. Arizona Student Learning Center

33. Indiana U. Information Commons

34. Cox Center - Emory

35. Bucknell Multimedia Area

36. Wellesley College Media & Technology Center

37. Dartmouth RWIT: Center for Research, Writing & IT

38. Ellenzweig Associates, Inc. Architects Michael Sloan Architects Vassar Science Visualization Lab

39. Planning should encompass All types of spaces Support Information resources Technology infrastructure

40. Intersection of Learning and Institutional Cyberinfrastructure Vassar College Media Cloisters

41. Scenario: American Politics Class  Students receive assignment  Project on last Presidential election Emory U. Library Classroom

42. Continuing Discussion in Informal Spaces  Wireless access  Laptops  Course Management System  Social Software Café - U. Georgia SLC

43. Information Commons  Access to Content: Print collections Abstracts E-journals Data - survey, polling, election  Access to: Hardware Software/Tools Network Expert assistance Dickinson College IC

44. Information Commons  Access to: Audio of speeches Video news broadcasts Video interviews Websites Dartmouth News Center

45. Spaces for Group Work Indiana U. Information Commons

46. Students create course projects  Access to: Hardware/software Storage space/servers Networks Content Expert assistance Group space

47. Producing Audio Files  Editing and integrating audio Speeches Interviews  Creating podcasts Denison College MIX Lab

48. Duke Interactive Multimedia Project Space Classroom

49. Students Practice Presentations  Computer projection-equipped classroom  Videotaping capabilities Georgia Tech IC

50. Student Presentations  Technology-enabled classrooms Hardware/Software Network connections  Supportive faculty Dickinson College Classroom

51. People  Collaboration  New types of information professionals  Training  Information and technology literacy

52. Invest in Collaboration  Work with faculty on digital initiatives  Work with instructional technologists on learning materials  Jointly train student assistants or staff with other units, e.g. writing center

53. Working Together to Create the Cyberinfrastructure  People Faculty Students Information Professionals Administrators  Content  Pedagogy  Network/Hardware/Software/Tools  Learning Spaces

54. Pedagogy  Active learning  Collaborative learning  Students participating in research  Student production of new types of (multimedia) projects

55. Liberal Arts Colleges, Learning, & IT

56. Practical Implementation  Align with campus goals/objectives  Use cyberinfrastructure as planning framework  Make strategic choices  Reallocate resources  Provide professional development opportunities  Involve students (“reverse mentoring”)

57. References  ACLS Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences report http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/cyber.htm  Designing and Supporting Science-Driven Infrastructure, CTWatch Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 2, May 2006 http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/pdf/ctwatch quarterly-6.pdf http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/pdf/ctwatch quarterly-6.pdf  Report of the NSF Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.j sp?ods_key=cise051203

58. Thanks to many individuals and institutions for providing images and/or permissions Contact: Joan Lippincott Joan@cni.org www.cni.org Subscribe to cni-announce, our news listserv