We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElijah Schwartz
Modified over 3 years ago
The Economic Impact of Hospital Closures in Ontario ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics prepared for: Ontario Health Coalition prepared by: The Centre for Spatial Economics January 31, 2009
Background ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics Ontarios economy is in recession and its government is expected to run deficits for the next few years Ministry of Health is restructuring and reducing funding for the provinces hospitals The OHC expects hospitals in some communities to close with services transferred to larger, centralized, regional facilities Job losses of 5,000 expected through lay-offs and attrition
Assumptions & Direct Impact ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics Assume 5,000 fewer health care workers in 2009, with 1,000 through lay-offs and 4,000 through attrition Direct reduction of health care sector GDP of $252 million Direct reduction in government spending on hospitals of $325 million Restructuring costs of $49 million include severance pay (9 months for workers on lay-off) and early retirement packages (1 month for workers lost through attrition) Study does not include estimate of revenue from the sale and disposal of government assets nor does it include restructuring costs for facilities that need to be renovated or expanded This cut in spending is assumed to be permanent
Economic Impact Summary ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics The short-run impacts include a loss of 7,125 jobs, a reduction in GDP of $549 million, a drop in the standard of living, lower provincial government spending, revenues and deficit The long-run impacts arise from a negative economic cycle that permanently reduces Ontarios population by, on average, 18,900 with a loss of 11,230 jobs and $1.3 billion in GDP
Impact on Government Finances ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics Provincial government net lending improves in both the short- and the long- run. Ontario government savings reduced in the short-run by restructuring costs and in the short- and long-run by reduced revenues Federal government net lending deteriorates in both the short- and the long- run. Spending rises in the short-term reflecting higher EI payments but falls in the long-run because Ontarios population growth is reduced
Impact by Sector ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics The short-run employment impact is centered on the health care, construction, wholesale and retail trade, and professional services sectors The long-run employment impact is borne particularly by the health care, construction, education and government sectors
Community & Patient Impacts ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics Hospitals are a part of a regions economic foundation and are used to attract and retain business in the region Reduced health care services will lead to fewer medical procedures performed and longer patient wait times for treatment Wait times impose costs on the patient and the economy through reduced productivity CMA study established that the hidden costs of an underperforming health care system can be very high
Conclusions ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics Reducing hospital budgets can ease the pressure on provincial budget – but at the cost of permanent reductions in employment, GDP and the standard of living Impact extends beyond workers and business affected by the cuts and includes community and patient impacts Its the wrong time to cut public spending Government should stay the course with hospital funding in the current economic environment and engage in constructive, long-term planning for the provinces health care sector
©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics for more information please contact: Robin Somerville Director, Corporate Research Services The Centre for Spatial Economics 15 Martin Street, Suite 203 Milton, ON Canada L9T 2R1 phone: web:www.c4se.com
Appendix: C 4 SE Provincial Modeling System ©2009 The Centre for Spatial Economics The C 4 SEs provincial models are dynamic multi- sector econometric models The C 4 SEs Provincial Modeling System is a bottom- up system of provincial macroeconometric models which are linked by a national add-up model that helps determine: Trade Labour migration Prices Interest Rates Exchange Rates The models are solved iteratively using updated information from the national model to generate a convergent solution
Ontario’s Long-Term Report on the Economy Highlights Ministry of Finance January 2010.
Compilation of ideas from Constituents.. Canada’s Economic Performance “Where we have been” Balanced Budgets Reduced national.
1 Economic Impacts of Alaska Fiscal Options Overview of Draft Conclusions Gunnar Knapp Director and Professor of Economics Institute of Social and Economic.
1 Economic Cost of Wait Times in Canada: Preliminary Assumptions and Findings ©2006 The Centre for Spatial Economics Robin Somerville Director, Corporate.
AS Economics PowerPoint Briefings 2006 tutor2u ™ tutor2u ™ Unemployment.
The Impacts of Government Borrowing 1. Government Borrowing Affects Investment and the Trade Balance.
Labor Market Information: Key Factors Driving Current & Future Job Demand in Michigan Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget Bureau of.
The Bank of Israels Recommendations regarding Policies for Dealing with the Crisis Research Department Bank of Israel March 2009.
Objectives and Instruments of Macroeconomics Introduction to Macroeconomics.
Organized plan of Health Services Combination of facilities, organizations and trained personnel Publically Funded System Largely funded by.
Toby Sanger, Senior Economist CUPE National 1. 1.Economic crisis and impacts 2.Causes and responses 3.Economic outlook 4.Impact on public services and.
National Institute of Economic and Social Research How to pay for the crisis Ray Barrell February 2010 NIESR.
1 Financial aspects of the European ageing society An assessment f inancial consultancy S o v e r e i g n Drs A.P.Ranner © Transnational foresight, The.
Measuring the Economy Goals 9.01 & Why does the government need to know what the economy is doing? The government makes decisions that affect.
Unemployment. Definition of Unemployment An unemployed person is Not working, willing and able to work Actively seeking a job and willing to accept.
The Most Important Things to Understand About Alaska’s Fiscal Situation Gunnar Knapp Director and Professor of Economics Institute of Social and Economic.
The Current Context Ontario Fiscal Policy Rhetoric Vs. Reality.
Growth of the Economy And Cyclical Instability. Content Economic or business cycle The Nature and Causes of Fluctuations in economic activity The trend.
Click here to Commence quiz Click here to Commence quiz © APT Initiatives Ltd UNIT 2 The National Economy 2.3 Economic Performance Test 1.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Fiscal Policy 24 CHAPTER.
America’s National Debt and Long-Term Outlook An Overview of the Challenge and the Implications for Young People March 2009.
Unit 3: Macroeconomics Chapter 9: An Introduction to Macroeconomics Chapter 10: The Business Cycle and Fiscal Policy Chapter 11: Money and Banking.
Unemployment AS economics presentation on the measurement and causes of unemployment.
Click here to Commence quiz Click here to Commence quiz © APT Initiatives Ltd UNIT 2 The National Economy 2.4 Macroeconomic Policy Test 1.
Sun Corridor Projections 1 Sun Corridor Projections Base and Alternative Scenarios Prepared for Central Arizona Association of Governments January 8, 2009.
Circular Flow Model and Economic Activity The circular flow model of the economy illustrates how the Australian economy works and how its different parts.
Chancellors Budget Workshop State Economic and Fiscal Forecast Presented by: Michelle McKay Underwood Director, Legislative Services School Services of.
Supply side policy issues Learning Outcome: To understand the issues of using supply side policy.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.