We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIsaac Bond
Modified over 4 years ago
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 Gulliver in the land of giants? Internationalisation of the r&d of a small enterprise 17.06.2004 Markku Rajala President, ABR Innova Oy
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 ABR Innova Oy is a company, which commercialises ideas related to ceramics materials and high-temperature technology. The ideas are developed to products or processes inside ABR and then spinned-off to new companies, who produce the final products. Three companies have been spinned-off and three are under the development stage. ABR Innova Oy
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 For an innovative, small company the international r&d is the only way to achieve the critical knowledge-mass required for the growth ABR Innova Oy, like most small companies, have to find a niche- area, where the global market size is comparable to the companys revenue, so that the company can be a global market leader. The nicheness means that there are only few experts related to the specific technology area – globally. The company has to find these experts and co-operate with them.
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 The key force driving the (international) r&d of a small company has to be short-term sales – unless the company is heavily funded. Time-to- market and time-to-profit need to be clearly defined. R&D –people tend to provide excellent technical quality – but seldom in schedule. Time-to-market means nothing to the research organisations – and time-to-profit even less! A small innovation-based company may use more than 30% of its revenue to r&d – and it needs to know that the investment pays back in short time. This is even more important in (more expensive) international r&d.
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 The internationalisation process is complicated and requires an outstanding network and long- term relationships. Governmental organisations could do much better in helping the SMEs in this area. The organisations do not make the networks work – people do! Networks are created by face-to-face discussions developed by conference calls and organised by emails. (International) co-operation is easy, if the motives are same – unfortunately this is seldom true between an SME and a research organisation. Linear process is replaced by parallel process.
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PATENTING DESIGN PRODUCTION Happy Days are gone Finnish Academy Tekes Keksintösäätiö SALES Tekes Banks, Finnvera TE-center
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 ? RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT PATENTING DESIGN PRODUCTION Bad New Days are here
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 SME clusters can work extremely well in globalising r&d The members (SMEs) of the cluster(s) share the same motive – making business. Requires open, reliable co-operation between the cluster members. Mostly change of information – much silent knowledge.
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 Multinational r&d programmes (like European programmes) are far too bureaucratic and slow for SMEs
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 R&D co-operation between SMEs is easy and straightforward – leave the European research money to universities Italian SME Danish Co. US SME INNOVATION PATENTING CONTACTING PARTNERS FEASIBILITY STUDY R&D PILOT-PRODUCTION 6 months to $5-15M market
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 Intellectual property rights (IPR) are a key issue to a knowledge-based SME. USAs patent policy is superior to the European system and also one of the reasons why US is an attractive place for placing r&d efforts. European patent – never ? Patenting in US is easy – and after filing the patent, co-operation in r&d is much safer.
© ABR Innova Oy, 2004 Thank you! www.abr.fi www.nanoharju.fi
DIT SMEs Forum and V INSME International Conference
Innovation Management BINASIA – Viet Nam National Workshop January 2005 Hanoi, Viet Nam N. Srinivasan Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology.
From R&D to competitiveness Tom Bo Clausen Embedded Systems, IST Programme DG Information Society and Media European Commission.
Support for Innovation – Unit D2
REGINS: Joining forces within INTERREG III C Stuttgart - New products by networking of networks - the Interreg IIIC REGINS project Regional standardised.
European Commission DG Competition Limitations on public funding of innovation support services Jean-Charles DJELALIAN.
Past President of LES Scandinavia
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATION CENTER WIPO/INN/MCT/04/3 WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT Muscat, April 20, 2004.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Intellectual property and access to finance for high growth companies 14 September 2007 Patrick KLEIN.
Valorisation of knowledge-intensive ideas in the South Baltic Area VALOR This project is part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development.
HORIZON 2020 STEPHEN FOX FOR KEELE UNIVERSITY 26 TH FEBRUARY 2014.
Stefano Fontana European Commission DG RTD Research for the benefit of SMEs SMEs in the.
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
The ECPG’s final report Structured in two parts: Three core principles for the next stage of cluster programmes Eight action proposals directed at both.
Tax incentives for innovation Presentation R&D Tax relief on the costs of innovation Patent Box Tax relief on the profits of innovation Simon Briton, Clive.
SME Support under Horizon 2020 DG Research and Innovation, Info Day, Brussels, November 2013.
Science and Technology Parks: a driving force for the knowledge-based economy in Europe « Promoting industrial innovation and knowledge-intensive services.
DM The impact of Tekes and innovation activities 2013.
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
ENTERPRISE EUROPE NETWORK INTRODUCTION Jan Gerritsen – Manager EEN IRELAND Blachardstown – 3rd February 2015.
© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.