1. Applying Science to Transform Lives TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRI science addiction Payment Reform for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Mid-Atlantic CTN Regional Dissemination Workshop June 3-4, 2010

2. TRI science addiction Overview Addiction is a Health Care issue Chronic not acute condition Health care financing/payment reform Some new models Implications for Addiction Treatment

3. TRI science addiction Core Foundation Health Care Arena – Addiction is a HEALTH problem: Part of mainstream healthcare Chronic not acute condition: Purchasers will need to change contracts, funding mechanisms and expectations Treatment programs will need to change from acute to chronic care design and service delivery (more)

4. TRI science addiction Core Foundation Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) New medications for addiction Psychotropic meds for co-occurring MH disorders Recovery is the goal Treatment prepares for recovery Continuing care Disease & self management not program completion Recovery Support Recovery Coaches/Linkage Coordinators Family and other “community strengths” support Return to treatment program for “tune ups”, etc.

5. TRI science addiction Acute Care Assumptions Some fixed amount or duration of treatment will resolve the problem Treatment Completion is a goal and expected outcome Evaluation of effectiveness should occur following completion Poor outcome means failure

6. TRI science addiction In Chronic Care The effects of treatment do not last very long after care stops Patients who are out of contact are at elevated risk for relapse

7. TRI science addiction New Expectations Programs are responsible for results during treatment Treatment offers choices – patient centered/adaptive care Easy transition between levels of care and treatment programs Collaboration vs. competition among programs Recovery Oriented Systems of Care: Continuing care and self-management

8. TRI science addiction Health Care Payment/Financing Reform

9. TRI science addiction

10. TRI science addiction Congressional Research Service Healthcare Payment Reform Institute of Medicine issued several reports recommending differential payments based on quality in 1999, 2001 and 2006. Medicare Payment Advisory Committee has recommended paying providers different rates based on differences in quality in 2004, 2005 and 2006.

11. TRI science addiction Disruptive Innovation ( NY Times 2/1/09 ) Concept pioneered by Clayton Christensen from Harvard Business School Old business models based on treating illness not promoting wellness –Hospitals benefit from full beds and repeat visits –No financial incentive to keep patients healthy Acute disease drove the costs (more)

12. TRI science addiction Disruptive Innovation Disruptive innovation will shape healthcare systems to provide a continuum of care focused on each individual’s needs, instead of focusing on the crises. Fixed fee, integrated systems Routine cases handled through lower cost facilities Follow patients wherever they go within an integrated system Integrated systems are the disruptive innovation needed to be turned loose on healthcare

13. TRI science addiction Health CEO’s for Health Reform 30% of resources spent on health care in US are a result of too few efforts to coordinate care and not enough attention to quality. Realign current incentives to create new payment structures that reward high-quality, patient centered, efficient care, while discouraging the fragmented and low –value care that drives health care cost today. (more)

14. TRI science addiction Health CEO’s for Health Reform Improve the way we deliver care by moving toward more integrated, coordinated delivery models. Align incentives across multiple providers to give efficient, high-quality care both medical and business value. Link payment to value not volume. (more)

15. TRI science addiction Health CEO’s for Health Reform “VISION” System should deliver the right care, at the right time, at the right place, with the right outcome. Payment policy should be refocused to reward: Clinical quality of care Patient satisfaction Better health Efficient resource use. (more)

16. TRI science addiction Health CEO’s for Health Reform “Specific Proposals” Fee for service is unsustainable: Transition the entire delivery system away from fee for service payment and toward outcome driven, bundled payments that encourage provider accountability. Payment will be dependent on compliance with standards related to quality of care, patient outcomes and satisfaction, and patient- centeredness. (more)

17. TRI science addiction Health CEO’s for Health Reform “Specific Proposals” Develop and transition toward bundled payment models: Linking payment to quality and patient outcomes within an episode or continuum of care delivery and allowing clinicians to share in the potential savings will encourage care coordination, increase quality and efficiency, and refocus health care on the patient. Bundled payments can be used to set “efficient” payment rates for groups of services that should be delivered to specific types of patients.

18. TRI science addiction Build Systems of Care Through Partnerships Providers must act in concert: –Handoffs: adequate communication, sharing of patient information (transparency), clear lines of accountability –Transitions: carefully planned and executed with adequate patient and family caregiver involvement –Referrals to specialists: informed by complete information on services performed and the benefits of additional services (more)

19. TRI science addiction Build Systems of Care Through Partnerships –Adherence to practice guidelines: the responsibility of all providers of the complete bundle of services –Provision of ongoing support: to patients for self-management and maintenance of healthy lifestyles (more)

20. TRI science addiction Build Systems of Care Through Partnerships Providers must look beyond walls of their own institutions or practices Providers will likely pursue various types of “partnership’ arrangements to work more closely and effectively, and to share financial rewards Some of the greatest gains will come from the collective efforts of the multiple stakeholders in the system

21. TRI science addiction Payment Reform Models Pay for Performance Prometheus Payment Accountable Care Organizations (ACO’s)

22. TRI science addiction

23. TRI science addiction Pay For Performance

24. TRI science addiction Theory and Conceptual Foundation Economic theory holds that individual purchasers compare their implicit assessment of value against the explicit price to make optimal purchasing decisions. In health care, this relationship has been almost non-existent because buyers and payers are not typically the patients who receive the care.

25. TRI science addiction

26. TRI science addiction Theory and Conceptual Foundation Insurers and payers have not made any distinctions in payments to providers who exhibit differences in quality. P4P programs are an attempt to bring this relationship between prices and value, as reflected in quality care, into a closer balance.

27. TRI science addiction A P4P Research Report Med-Vantage Fee for service payments encourage overuse, while capitated payments encourage under-use. Neither systematically rewards excellence in quality. P4P incentive programs are designed to overcome these limitations by aligning financial reward with improved outcomes.

28. TRI science addiction Congressional Research Service Report for Congress P4P Defined A pay for performance system is a remuneration arrangement in which a portion of the payments is based on performance assessed against a defined measure. Typically, there is another component of the remuneration that is independent of the amount at risk. The terms merit and bonus pay are also used to describe similar systems.

29. TRI science addiction Elements Common to P4P Programs A set of targets or objectives that define what will be evaluated Performance standards for establishing the target criteria Measures to determine whether the targets have been achieved Rewards – typically financial incentives – that are at risk, including the amount and the method for allocating payments among those who meet or exceed the reward threshold.

30. TRI science addiction Impact of Private Sector P4P Programs Rewarding Results grant program funded by RWJF and California Healthcare Foundation, and administered by the Leapfrog Group

31. TRI science addiction Impact of Private Sector P4P Programs Financial incentives motivate change – provided they are large enough to make a difference. Non-financial incentives also can make a difference. Engaging physicians is a critical activity – they must be brought in early as collaborators to ensure that the goals are clinically meaningful. There is no clear picture yet of return on investment. (more)

32. TRI science addiction Impact of Private Sector P4P Programs P4P is not a magic bullet – it is one of a number of activities that can work to improve healthcare quality and change the way it is delivered and financed.

33. TRI science addiction MedVantage P4P Survey (2008) N = 62 P4P Program Responses What Results do you attribute to P4P? 84% - Performance on clinical measures improved 66% - Improvement was statistically significant What changes do you anticipate making? 65% - Expand scope or number of measures used 53% - Change performance domains or relative weighting of measures 0% - Discontinue the program

34. TRI science addiction Prometheus Payment

35. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Payment Taking up IOM’s challenge, a group of experts from healthcare financing, law, medicine, quality improvement, research and economics, convened in 2004 to develop a new provider payment model. Seeks to transform health care payment by moving away from unit of service payment to episode of care payment.

36. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Payment Tests paying for individual, patient centered treatment that fairly rewards providers for coordinating and providing high quality care. Centers on packaging payment around a comprehensive episode of care that covers all patient services related to a single illness.

37. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Payment Covered services are determined by commonly accepted clinical guidelines or expert opinion that lay out tested, medically accepted methods for best treating the condition from beginning to end. The services are calculated into “Evidence-informed Case Rates” (ECR’s), which creates a specific budget for the entire care episode.

38. TRI science addiction

39. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Payment ECR’s include all the covered services related to the care of a single condition, bundled across all the providers who would treat a given patient for a given condition. What makes PROMETHEUS different is its strong incentive for clinical collaboration to ensure positive patient outcomes.

40. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Payment Provider is paid monthly for the duration of the ECR an amount which reflects 90% of the agreed upon rate. 10% holdback is paid based on the results of the Scorecard: Quantifies whether the salient elements of the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) were provided, the patient’s experience of the care, and the patient’s outcomes. 70% of the score based on what the provider himself does; 30% reflects what other providers treating the patient does.

41. TRI science addiction PROMETHEUS Practice Nexus Intended to foster clinical collaboration and flexibility in how care is provided, so long as the salient elements of the CPG are present. Because all providers in the ECR do better financially when they improve quality, PROMETHEUS encourages collaboration among providers, especially those who score highly on the scorecards.

42. TRI science addiction Accountable Care Organizations (ACO’s)

43. TRI science addiction Accountable Care Organizations MedPac Report to Congress – 2009 Basic concept – holding a set of providers responsible for the health care of a population This set of providers is an Accountable Care Organization

44. TRI science addiction ACO’s Includes at least primary care physicians, specialists and hospitals Defining characteristic – the ACO members agree to accept joint responsibility for the quality and cost of care received by their ACO patients.

45. TRI science addiction ACO’s Goal – to create an incentive for providers to constrain growth in volume while improving quality of care ACO member providers are held jointly responsible for quality and cost metrics Expected to improve coordination of care and reduce duplication of services

46. TRI science addiction ACO’s If the ACO meets both quality and cost targets, members receive a bonus If the ACO fails to meet both, no bonus and possible withholds

47. TRI science addiction ACO’s Idea is to create a set of incentives strong enough to overcome the incentives in fee- for-service system for increased volume without improving quality ACO’s are being envisioned as one tool to induce change in the health care delivery system

48. TRI science addiction Concluding Thoughts Why do people who know the least know it the loudest? If you’re going to try cross-country skiing, start with a small country. Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

49. TRI science addiction Contact Information Jack Kemp Treatment Research Institute jkemp@tresearch.org 215-399-0980