1. The Evolution of Populations
Chapter 23
The Evolution of Populations

2. HW: Type MLA format Due WED.
Explain Osmosis and Diffusion
Explain 3 variables that affect Diffusion and Osmosis – SCIENTIFIC Explanation
Provide 2 examples of where
Osmosis occurs in real world
Diffusion in real world

3. Overview: The Smallest Unit of Evolution
One misconception is that organisms evolve during their lifetimes
Natural selection acts on individuals, but only populations evolve
Consider, for example, a population of medium ground finches on Daphne Major Island
During a drought, large-beaked birds were more likely to crack large seeds and survive
The finch population evolved by natural selection
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

4. Figure 23.1
Figure 23.1 Is this finch evolving?

5. Average beak depth (mm)
Figure 23.2 10 9
Average beak depth (mm) 8
Figure 23.2 Evidence of selection by food source.
1976
(similar to the
prior 3 years)
1978
(after
drought)

6. Three mechanisms cause allele frequency change:
Microevolution is a change in allele frequencies in a population over generations
Three mechanisms cause allele frequency change:
Natural selection
Genetic drift
Gene flow
Only natural selection causes adaptive evolution
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

7. Concept 23.1: Genetic variation makes evolution possible
Variation in heritable traits is a prerequisite for evolution
Mendel’s work on pea plants provided evidence of discrete heritable units (genes)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

8. Genetic Variation
Genetic variation among individuals is caused by differences in genes or other DNA segments
Phenotype is the product of inherited genotype and environmental influences
Natural selection can only act on variation with a genetic component
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

9. Figure 23.3
(a)
(b)
Figure 23.3 Nonheritable variation.

10. Variation Within a Population
Both discrete and quantitative characters contribute to variation within a population
Discrete characters can be classified on an either-or basis
Quantitative characters vary along a continuum within a population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

11. Genetic variation can be measured as gene variability or nucleotide variability
For gene variability, average heterozygosity measures the average percent of loci that are heterozygous in a population
Nucleotide variability is measured by comparing the DNA sequences of pairs of individuals
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

12. Variation Between Populations
Most species exhibit geographic variation, differences between gene pools of separate populations
For example, Madeira is home to several isolated populations of mice
Chromosomal variation among populations is due to drift, not natural selection
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

13. Figure 23.4 1
2.4
3.14
5.18 6
7.15
8.11
9.12
10.16
13.17 19 XX
Figure 23.4 Geographic variation in isolated mouse populations on Madeira. 1
2.19
3.8
4.16
5.14
6.7
9.10
11.12
13.17
15.18 XX

14. Some examples of geographic variation occur as a cline, which is a graded change in a trait along a geographic axis
For example, mummichog fish vary in a cold-adaptive allele along a temperature gradient
This variation results from natural selection
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

15. Ldh-Bb allele frequency
Figure 23.5
1.0
0.8
0.6
Ldh-Bb allele frequency
0.4
0.2
Figure 23.5 A cline determined by temperature. 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30
Latitude (ºN)
Maine
Cold (6°C)
Georgia
Warm (21ºC)

16. Sources of Genetic Variation
New genes and alleles can arise by mutation or gene duplication
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

17. animation
Animation: Genetic Variation from Sexual Recombination Right-click slide / select “Play”
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 17

18. Formation of New Alleles
A mutation is a change in nucleotide sequence of DNA
Only mutations in cells that produce gametes can be passed to offspring
A point mutation is a change in one base in a gene
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

19. The effects of point mutations can vary:
Mutations in noncoding regions of DNA are often harmless
Mutations to genes can be neutral because of redundancy in the genetic code
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

20. The effects of point mutations can vary:
Mutations that result in a change in protein production are often harmful
Mutations that result in a change in protein production can sometimes be beneficial
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

21. Altering Gene Number or Position
Chromosomal mutations that delete, disrupt, or rearrange many loci are typically harmful
Duplication of small pieces of DNA increases genome size and is usually less harmful
Duplicated genes can take on new functions by further mutation
An ancestral odor-detecting gene has been duplicated many times: humans have 1,000 copies of the gene, mice have 1,300
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

22. Rapid Reproduction Mutation rates are low in animals and plants
The average is about one mutation in every 100,000 genes per generation
Mutation rates are often lower in prokaryotes and higher in viruses
Example: HIV is an RNA virus, its replication cycle is two days, and because it uses the host cells mechanisms, there is not RNA repair mechanisms.
Mutation rates are higher
Compounding treatment effectiveness
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

23. Sexual Reproduction
Sexual reproduction can shuffle existing alleles into new combinations
In organisms that reproduce sexually, recombination of alleles is more important than mutation in producing the genetic differences that make adaptation possible
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

24. Concept 23.2: The Hardy-Weinberg equation can be used to test whether a population is evolving
The first step in testing whether evolution is occurring in a population is to clarify what we mean by a population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

25. Gene Pools and Allele Frequencies
A population is a localized group of individuals capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring
A gene pool consists of all the alleles for all loci in a population
A locus is fixed if all individuals in a population are homozygous for the same allele
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

26. Beaufort Sea Porcupine herd range Porcupine herd Fortymile herd range
Figure 23.6
MAP
AREA
CANADA
ALASKA
Beaufort Sea
NORTHWEST
TERRITORIES
Porcupine
herd range
Porcupine herd
Fortymile
herd range
Figure 23.6 One species, two populations.
ALASKA
YUKON
Fortymile herd

27. The frequency of an allele in a population can be calculated
For diploid organisms, the total number of alleles at a locus is the total number of individuals times 2
The total number of dominant alleles at a locus is 2 alleles for each homozygous dominant individual plus 1 allele for each heterozygous individual; the same logic applies for recessive alleles
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

28. The frequency of all alleles in a population will add up to 1
By convention, if there are 2 alleles at a locus, p and q are used to represent their frequencies
p represents Dominant allele
q represents Recessive allele
The frequency of all alleles in a population will add up to 1
For example, p + q = 1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

29. Calculate the number of copies of each allele:
For example, consider a population of wildflowers that is incompletely dominant for color:
320 red flowers (CRCR)
160 pink flowers (CRCW)
20 white flowers (CWCW)
Calculate the number of copies of each allele:
CR  (320  2)  160  800
CW  (20  2)  160  200
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

30. To calculate the frequency of each allele:
p  freq CR  800 / (800  200)  0.8
q  freq CW  200 / (800  200)  0.2
The sum of alleles is always 1
0.8  0.2  1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

31. The Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Hardy-Weinberg assesses what the genetic make up of a population would look like if it was not evolving.
If a population does not meet the criteria of the Hardy-Weinberg principle, it can be concluded that the population is evolving
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

32. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that frequencies of alleles and genotypes in a population remain constant from generation to generation
Providing segregation and recombination of allels are occurring (Mendel)
In a given population where gametes contribute to the next generation randomly, allele frequencies will not change
Mendelian inheritance preserves genetic variation in a population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

33. 80% chance 20% chance 80% chance 20% chance
Figure 23.7
Alleles in the population
Frequencies of alleles
Gametes produced
p = frequency of
Each egg: Each sperm:
CR allele  = 0.8
q = frequency of
80%
chance
20%
chance
80%
chance
20%
chance
CW allele  = 0.2
Figure 23.7 Selecting alleles at random from a gene pool.

34. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium describes the constant frequency of alleles in such a gene pool
Consider, for example, the same population of 500 wildflowers and 1,000 alleles where
p  freq CR  0.8
q  freq CW  0.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

35. The frequency of genotypes can be calculated
CRCR  p2  (0.8)2  0.64
CRCW  2pq  2(0.8)(0.2)  0.32
CWCW  q2  (0.2)2  0.04
The frequency of genotypes can be confirmed using a Punnett square
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

36. 64% (p2) CRCR 16% (pq) CRCW 16% (qp) CRCW 4% (q2) CWCW
Figure 23.8a
80% CR (p = 0.8)
20% CW (q = 0.2)
Sperm CR
(80%) CW
(20%) CR
(80%)
Figure 23.8 The Hardy-Weinberg principle.
64% (p2)
CRCR
16% (pq)
CRCW
Eggs CW
16% (qp)
CRCW
4% (q2)
CWCW
(20%)

37. 64% (p2) CRCR 16% (pq) CRCW 16% (qp) CRCW 4% (q2) CWCW
Figure 23.8b
Sperm CR
(80%) CW
(20%) CR
(80%)
64% (p2)
CRCR
16% (pq)
CRCW
Eggs CW
16% (qp)
CRCW
4% (q2)
CWCW
(20%)
64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW
Gametes of this generation:
64% CR
(from CRCR plants)
16% CR
(from CRCW plants)
Figure 23.8 The Hardy-Weinberg principle. + =
80% CR = 0.8 = p
4% CW
(from CWCW plants)
16% CW
(from CRCW plants) + =
20% CW = 0.2 = q
Genotypes in the next generation:
64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW plants

38. Figure 23.8
80% CR (p = 0.8)
20% CW (q = 0.2)
Sperm CR
(80%) CW
(20%) CR
(80%)
64% (p2)
CRCR
16% (pq)
CRCW
Eggs CW
16% (qp)
CRCW
4% (q2)
CWCW
(20%)
64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW
Figure 23.8 The Hardy-Weinberg principle.
Gametes of this generation:
64% CR
(from CRCR plants)
16% CR
(from CRCW plants) + =
80% CR = 0.8 = p
4% CW
(from CWCW plants)
16% CW
(from CRCW plants) + =
20% CW = 0.2 = q
Genotypes in the next generation:
64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW plants

39. If p and q represent the relative frequencies of the only two possible alleles in a population at a particular locus, then
p2  2pq  q2  1
where p2 and q2 represent the frequencies of the homozygous genotypes and 2pq represents the frequency of the heterozygous genotype
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

40. Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
The Hardy-Weinberg theorem describes a hypothetical population that is not evolving
In real populations, allele and genotype frequencies do change over time
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

41. Extremely large population size No gene flow
The five conditions for nonevolving populations are rarely met in nature:
No mutations
Random mating
No natural selection
Extremely large population size
No gene flow
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

42. Natural populations can evolve at some loci, while being in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at other loci
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

43. Applying the Hardy-Weinberg Principle
We can assume the locus that causes phenylketonuria (PKU) is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium given that:
PKU occurs in 1 out of 10,000 births in US
Homozygous recesive
The PKU gene mutation rate is low
Mate selection is random with respect to whether or not an individual is a carrier for the PKU allele
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

44. The population is large
Natural selection can only act on rare homozygous individuals who do not follow dietary restrictions
The population is large
Migration has no effect as many other populations have similar allele frequencies
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

45. The occurrence of PKU is 1 per 10,000 births
q2 
q  0.01
The frequency of normal alleles is
p  1 – q  1 – 0.01  0.99
The frequency of carriers is
2pq  2  0.99  0.01 
or approximately 2% of the U.S. population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

46. Concept check 23.2
A locus that affects the susceptibility to degenerative brain disease has two alleles, A and a, in a population, 16 people have AA; 92 have Aa; and 12 have aa. Is this population evolving? Explain.

47. Tuesday, October 14 Homework – due Thursday
Write 3 questions pertaining to your osmosis/diffusion knowledge (previous hw) (you should all have a copy on file)
Based on the 3 questions, create 3 corresponding hypothesis that are supported by scientific knowledge.
Hardy Weinberg Practice
TEST Monday October 20th Chapter 22, 23; include knowledge on Mendelian genetics, mutations. Review Sickle Cell anemia.

48. Concept 23.3: Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow can alter allele frequencies in a population
Three major factors alter allele frequencies and bring about most evolutionary change:
Natural selection
Genetic drift
Gene flow
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

49. Natural Selection
Differential success in reproduction results in certain alleles being passed to the next generation in greater proportions
For example, an allele that confers resistance to DDT increased in frequency after DDT was used widely in agriculture
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

50. Genetic Drift
The smaller a sample, the greater the chance of deviation from a predicted result
Genetic drift describes how allele frequencies fluctuate unpredictably from one generation to the next
Genetic drift tends to reduce genetic variation through losses of alleles
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

51. Causes of evolutionary change
Animation: Causes of Evolutionary Change
Right-click slide / select “Play”
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 51

52. Generation 1 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3 CRCR
Figure
CRCR
CRCR
CRCW
CWCW
CRCR
CRCW
CRCR
CRCW
CRCR
Figure 23.9 Genetic drift.
CRCW
Generation 1
p (frequency of CR) = 0.7
q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

53. 5 plants leave off- spring
Figure 5
plants
leave
off-
spring
CRCR
CRCR
CWCW
CRCR
CRCW
CRCW
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
CWCW
CRCW
CRCW
CRCR
CRCW
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
Figure 23.9 Genetic drift.
CRCW
CRCW
CRCW
Generation 1
Generation 2
p (frequency of CR) = 0.7
p = 0.5
q (frequency of CW) = 0.3
q = 0.5

54. 5 plants leave off- spring 2 plants leave off- spring
Figure 5
plants
leave
off-
spring 2
plants
leave
off-
spring
CRCR
CRCR
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
CRCW
CRCW
CRCR
CRCR
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
CRCW
CRCW
CRCR
CRCR
CRCR
CRCW
CWCW
CRCR
CRCR
CRCR
Figure 23.9 Genetic drift.
CRCW
CRCW
CRCW
CRCR
CRCR
Generation 1
Generation 2
Generation 3
p (frequency of CR) = 0.7
p = 0.5
p = 1.0
q (frequency of CW) = 0.3
q = 0.5
q = 0.0

55. The Founder Effect
The founder effect occurs when a few individuals become isolated from a larger population
Allele frequencies in the small founder population can be different from those in the larger parent population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

56. The Bottleneck Effect
The bottleneck effect is a sudden reduction in population size due to a change in the environment
The resulting gene pool may no longer be reflective of the original population’s gene pool
If the population remains small, it may be further affected by genetic drift
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

57. Figure
Figure The bottleneck effect.
Original
population

58. Original population Bottlenecking event
Figure
Figure The bottleneck effect.
Original
population
Bottlenecking
event

59. Original population Bottlenecking event Surviving population
Figure
Figure The bottleneck effect.
Original
population
Bottlenecking
event
Surviving
population

60. Understanding the bottleneck effect can increase understanding of how human activity affects other species
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

61. Case Study: Impact of Genetic Drift on the Greater Prairie Chicken
Loss of prairie habitat caused a severe reduction in the population of greater prairie chickens in Illinois
The surviving birds had low levels of genetic variation, and only 50% of their eggs hatched
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

62. Greater prairie chicken
Figure 23.11
Pre-bottleneck
(Illinois, 1820)
Post-bottleneck
(Illinois, 1993)
Greater prairie chicken
Range
of greater
prairie
chicken
(a)
Number
of alleles
per locus
Percentage
of eggs
hatched
Population
size
Location
Illinois
1930–1960s
1993
1,000–25,000
<50
5.2
3.7 93
<50
Figure Genetic drift and loss of genetic variation.
Kansas, 1998
(no bottleneck)
750,000
5.8 99
Nebraska, 1998
(no bottleneck)
75,000–
200,000
5.8 96
(b)

63. Greater prairie chicken
Figure 23.11a
Pre-bottleneck
(Illinois, 1820)
Post-bottleneck
(Illinois, 1993)
Greater prairie chicken
Range
of greater
prairie
chicken
Figure Genetic drift and loss of genetic variation.
(a)

64. Number of alleles per locus Percentage of eggs hatched Population size
Figure 23.11b
Number
of alleles
per locus
Percentage
of eggs
hatched
Population
size
Location
Illinois
1930–1960s
1993
1,000–25,000
<50
5.2
3.7 93
<50
Kansas, 1998
(no bottleneck)
750,000
5.8 99
Figure Genetic drift and loss of genetic variation.
Nebraska, 1998
(no bottleneck)
75,000–
200,000
5.8 96
(b)

65. Greater prairie chicken
Figure 23.11c
Greater prairie chicken
Figure Genetic drift and loss of genetic variation.

66. The results showed a loss of alleles at several loci
Researchers used DNA from museum specimens to compare genetic variation in the population before and after the bottleneck
The results showed a loss of alleles at several loci
Researchers introduced greater prairie chickens from populations in other states and were successful in introducing new alleles and increasing the egg hatch rate to 90%
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

67. Effects of Genetic Drift: A Summary
Genetic drift is significant in small populations
Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to change at random
Genetic drift can lead to a loss of genetic variation within populations
Genetic drift can cause harmful alleles to become fixed
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

68. Gene Flow
Gene flow consists of the movement of alleles among populations
Alleles can be transferred through the movement of fertile individuals or gametes (for example, pollen)
Gene flow tends to reduce variation among populations over time
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

69. Gene flow can decrease the fitness of a population
Consider, for example, the great tit (Parus major) on the Dutch island of Vlieland
Mating causes gene flow between the central and eastern populations
Immigration from the mainland introduces alleles that decrease fitness
Natural selection selects for alleles that increase fitness
Birds in the central region with high immigration have a lower fitness; birds in the east with low immigration have a higher fitness
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

70. Population in which the surviving females eventually bred 60 Central
Figure 23.12
Population in which the
surviving females
eventually bred 60
Central
population
Central 50
NORTH SEA
Eastern
population
Eastern
Vlieland,
the Netherlands 40
2 km
Survival rate (%) 30 20 10
Figure Gene flow and local adaptation.
Females born
in central
population
Females born
in eastern
population
Parus major

71. Figure 23.12a
Figure Gene flow and local adaptation.
Parus major

72. Gene flow can increase the fitness of a population
Consider, for example, the spread of alleles for resistance to insecticides
Insecticides have been used to target mosquitoes that carry West Nile virus and malaria
Alleles have evolved in some populations that confer insecticide resistance to these mosquitoes
The flow of insecticide resistance alleles into a population can cause an increase in fitness
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

73. Gene flow is an important agent of evolutionary change in human populations
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

74. Concept 23.4: Natural selection is the only mechanism that consistently causes adaptive evolution
Evolution by natural selection involves both chance and “sorting”
New genetic variations arise by chance
Beneficial alleles are “sorted” and favored by natural selection
Only natural selection consistently results in adaptive evolution
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

75. A Closer Look at Natural Selection
Natural selection brings about adaptive evolution by acting on an organism’s phenotype
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

76. Relative Fitness
The phrases “struggle for existence” and “survival of the fittest” are misleading as they imply direct competition among individuals
Reproductive success is generally more subtle and depends on many factors
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

77. Relative fitness is the contribution an individual makes to the gene pool of the next generation, relative to the contributions of other individuals
Selection favors certain genotypes by acting on the phenotypes of certain organisms
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

78. Directional, Disruptive, and Stabilizing Selection
Three modes of selection:
Directional selection favors individuals at one end of the phenotypic range
Disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of the phenotypic range
Stabilizing selection favors intermediate variants and acts against extreme phenotypes
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

79. Frequency of individuals
Figure 23.13
Original population
Frequency of
individuals
Phenotypes (fur color)
Original
population
Evolved
population
Figure Modes of selection.
(a) Directional selection
(b) Disruptive selection
(c) Stabilizing selection

80. (a) Directional selection
Figure 23.13a
Original
population
Evolved
population
Figure Modes of selection.
(a) Directional selection

81. (b) Disruptive selection
Figure 23.13b
Original
population
Evolved
population
Figure Modes of selection.
(b) Disruptive selection

82. (c) Stabilizing selection
Figure 23.13c
Original
population
Evolved
population
Figure Modes of selection.
(c) Stabilizing selection

83. The Key Role of Natural Selection in Adaptive Evolution
Striking adaptations have arisen by natural selection
For example, cuttlefish can change color rapidly for camouflage
For example, the jaws of snakes allow them to swallow prey larger than their heads
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

84. Bones shown in green are movable. Ligament Figure 23.14
Figure Movable jaw bones in snakes.

85. Figure 23.14a
Figure Movable jaw bones in snakes.

86. Natural selection increases the frequencies of alleles that enhance survival and reproduction
Adaptive evolution occurs as the match between an organism and its environment increases
Because the environment can change, adaptive evolution is a continuous process
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

87. Genetic drift and gene flow do not consistently lead to adaptive evolution as they can increase or decrease the match between an organism and its environment
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

88. Sexual Selection
Sexual selection is natural selection for mating success
It can result in sexual dimorphism, marked differences between the sexes in secondary sexual characteristics
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

89. Figure 23.15
Figure Sexual dimorphism and sexual selection.

90. Intrasexual selection is competition among individuals of one sex (often males) for mates of the opposite sex
Intersexual selection, often called mate choice, occurs when individuals of one sex (usually females) are choosy in selecting their mates
Male showiness due to mate choice can increase a male’s chances of attracting a female, while decreasing his chances of survival
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

91. How do female preferences evolve?
The “good genes” hypothesis suggests that if a trait is related to male health, both the male trait and female preference for that trait should increase in frequency
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

92. Offspring Performance 1995 1996
Figure 23.16
EXPERIMENT
Recording of SC
male’s call
Recording of LC
male’s call
Female gray
tree frog
SC male gray
tree frog
LC male gray
tree frog
SC sperm  Eggs  LC sperm
Offspring of Offspring of
SC father LC father
Survival and growth of these half-sibling offspring compared
Figure Inquiry: Do females select mates based on traits indicative of “good genes”?
RESULTS
Offspring Performance
1995
1996
Larval survival
LC better
NSD
Larval growth
NSD
LC better
Time to metamorphosis
LC better
(shorter)
LC better
(shorter)
NSD = no significant difference; LC better = offspring of LC males superior to
offspring of SC males.

93. EXPERIMENT Recording of SC male’s call Recording of LC male’s call
Figure 23.16a
EXPERIMENT
Recording of SC
male’s call
Recording of LC
male’s call
Female gray
tree frog
SC male gray
tree frog
LC male gray
tree frog
SC sperm  Eggs  LC sperm
Figure Inquiry: Do females select mates based on traits indicative of “good genes”?
Offspring of Offspring of
SC father LC father
Survival and growth of these half-sibling offspring compared

94. Offspring Performance 1995 1996
Figure 23.16b
RESULTS
Offspring Performance
1995
1996
Larval survival
LC better
NSD
Larval growth
NSD
LC better
Time to metamorphosis
LC better
(shorter)
LC better
(shorter)
Figure Inquiry: Do females select mates based on traits indicative of “good genes”?
NSD = no significant difference; LC better = offspring of LC males superior to
offspring of SC males.

95. The Preservation of Genetic Variation
Neutral variation is genetic variation that does not confer a selective advantage or disadvantage
Various mechanisms help to preserve genetic variation in a population
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

96. Diploidy
Diploidy maintains genetic variation in the form of hidden recessive alleles
Heterozygotes can carry recessive alleles that are hidden from the effects of selection
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

97. Balancing Selection
Balancing selection occurs when natural selection maintains stable frequencies of two or more phenotypic forms in a population
Balancing selection includes
Heterozygote advantage
Frequency-dependent selection
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

98. Heterozygote Advantage
Heterozygote advantage occurs when heterozygotes have a higher fitness than do both homozygotes
Natural selection will tend to maintain two or more alleles at that locus
The sickle-cell allele causes mutations in hemoglobin but also confers malaria resistance
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

99. Plasmodium falciparum (a parasitic unicellular eukaryote) 7.5–10.0%
Figure 23.17
Key
Frequencies of the
sickle-cell allele
0–2.5%
Figure Mapping malaria and the sickle-cell allele.
2.5–5.0%
5.0–7.5%
Distribution of
malaria caused by
Plasmodium falciparum
(a parasitic unicellular eukaryote)
7.5–10.0%
10.0–12.5%
>12.5%

100. Frequency-Dependent Selection
In frequency-dependent selection, the fitness of a phenotype declines if it becomes too common in the population
Selection can favor whichever phenotype is less common in a population
For example, frequency-dependent selection selects for approximately equal numbers of “right-mouthed” and “left-mouthed” scale-eating fish
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

101. “left-mouthed” individuals
Figure 23.18
“Left-mouthed”
P. microlepis
1.0
“Right-mouthed”
P. microlepis
“left-mouthed” individuals
Frequency of
0.5
Figure Frequency-dependent selection in scale-eating fish (Perissodus microlepis).
1981
’82
’83
’84
’85
’86
’87
’88
’89
’90
Sample year

102. Why Natural Selection Cannot Fashion Perfect Organisms
Selection can act only on existing variations
Evolution is limited by historical constraints
Adaptations are often compromises
Chance, natural selection, and the environment interact
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

103. Figure 23.19
Figure Evolutionary compromise.

104. Figure 23.UN01
CRCR
CWCW
Figure 23.UN01 In-text figure, p. 473
CRCW

105. Original population Evolved population Directional selection
Figure 23.UN02
Original
population
Evolved
population
Figure 23.UN02 Summary figure, Concept 23.4
Directional
selection
Disruptive
selection
Stabilizing
selection

106. (1–8 represent pairs of sites)
Figure 23.UN03
Sampling sites
(1–8 represent pairs of sites) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2
Allele
frequencies
lap94 alleles
Other lap alleles
Data from R. K. Koehn and T. J. Hilbish, The adaptive importance of genetic variation,
American Scientist 75:134–141 (1987).
Salinity increases toward the open ocean 7 8 5 6 4
Figure 23.UN03 Test Your Understanding, question 8 3
Long Island
Sound 2 1 9 10
Atlantic
Ocean 11

107. Figure 23.UN04
Figure 23.UN04 Appendix A: answer to Test Your Understanding, question 8