Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand Response Research Center Progress Report Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand Response Research Center Progress Report Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand Response Research Center Progress Report Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand Response Research Center Progress Report Roger Levy Program Development and Outreach Demand Response Research Center Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC June 3, 2008

2 2 Demand Response Progress DRRC research is supporting the California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission to develop Demand Response best practices, guidelines and standards. Global Temperature Setback (Title 24, 2008) Open Automated Demand Response – communication/information model Programmable Communicating Thermostat Reference Design (Title 24 – under review) Default Dynamic Pricing (CPUC Ruling for PG&E and SDG&E) Building Standard Communication Standard Reference Design Best Practice

3 3 Objective Scope to develop, prioritize, conduct, and disseminate multi-institutional research to facilitate DR 1.Improve DR effectiveness 2.Improve DR reliability and reliability 3.Reduce cost Focus on technologies, policies, programs, strategies and practices that emphasize 1.A market based approach 2.Customer Choice. DRRC Challenge

4 4 Conventional Program-Based DR Market-Based Price Responsive DR Value of DR DR-EE Link Equipment Customization Participation Targeted, LimitedAll Customers Utility Value No Integration Utility Provided Few Suppliers Utility definedCustomer Defined Customer Value Customer Provided Integrated Incentives Participation, Baseline Issues Performance, No Baseline Automation Not RequiredRequired DR Value Proposition – AutoDR Design Advantages

5 5 AutoDR is not a program or a technology. AutoDR is an information model that provides… 1.Open, interoperable signaling communication and technology platform a)Provides customers with automated, electronic price and reliability signals. b)Provides customers with capability to automate customized site- specific DR strategies. 2.Provides utilities with dispatchable operational capability similar to conventional generation resources. 3.Supports all DR direct control, emergency, bidding, and pricing options. AutoDR is being developed as a national communications standard through an industry consortium lead by the DRRC that includes PG&E, SCE, SDG&E, and CAISO. What is AutoDR Communication Standard

6 6 AutoDR Automation Server and Client

7 7

8 8 Features Continuous and Reliable - Provides continuous, secure, and reliable communications infrastructure. Translation - Translates pricing, reliability and DR events into continuous, open protocol internet signals Automation – Customer established DR action(s) programmed into facility energy management systems and control equipment initiated by receipt of price, reliability, event signal. Opt-Out – Customer decides and always has the capability to decide to participate, opt-out or override any event. Complete Data Model – Describes information model and architecture to communicate price, reliability, and other DR activation signals. Scalable – Provides scalable architecture scalable Benefits No stranded technology assets - Interoperable Supports RTP - Supports states policies to promote price response. Open AutoDR Communications Standards

9 9 Why a Standard ? Reduce barriers to DR - Integrate customer energy management and building control systems to facilitate customer response. Reduce the cost of DR – standards allow vendors and service providers to address common protocols and to develop common response strategies. Improve the effectiveness of DR – automation of customer devised response strategies o improves participation o Increases value by facilitating simultaneous economic and reliability applications

10 10 Contributors and Need for Support Standards Organizations National Institute of Standards and Testing Electric Power Research Institute Building Automation Controls Network - Utility Working Group Gridwise Open Advanced Meter Infrastructure Open Home Automation Network Gridnet Standards Organizations National Institute of Standards and Testing Electric Power Research Institute Building Automation Controls Network - Utility Working Group Gridwise Open Advanced Meter Infrastructure Open Home Automation Network Gridnet Technical Advisory Group Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Southern California Edison Co. San Diego Gas and Electric Co. California Independent System Operator California Energy Commission UC Berkeley California Institute for Energy and the Environment Enernex Technical Advisory Group Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Southern California Edison Co. San Diego Gas and Electric Co. California Independent System Operator California Energy Commission UC Berkeley California Institute for Energy and the Environment Enernex

11 11 Why AutoDR ? AutoDR Field Results Customer driven control strategies Increased DR impacts / effectiveness Continuity of customer response Reliable, stable load impacts Simultaneous price and reliability capability Dispatchable Reduced cost

12 12 CPUC ACR Objectives 2006 2007 Installed 2007 In-Process 1. Accelerate Implementation Commercial participants Industrial participants Peak Load Reduction 13 0 1 MW 125 3 18 MW 16 8 7 MW 2. Expand AutoDR beyond CPP to other DR options CPP only CPP, DBP, CBP 3. Expand the role of Technical Providers none 8 industry participants 4. Improve DR performance (Peak Reduction) Commercial Industrial Aggregate All Participants 13% -- 23% 46% 31% 12% 66% 37% 2007 Total 152 25MW 21% 52% 34% AutoDR Summary Results - 2007

13 13 Continuity / Reliability of Customer Response Average Peak Reduction for AutoDR Customers Continuing in 2007 0% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20% Average Peak Load Reduction 15 Sites 14% 13 Sites 13% 15 Sites 11% 5 Sites 10% 2003 1 2004 1 2005 2 2006 2 2007 2 1 - Customer response to test signals 2 - Customer response to CPP rate price signals. 10

14 14 Auto-DR Load Impact – 8/30 Non-Industrial PG&E AutoDR Test Day – Non-Industrial AutoDR Participants

15 15 Auto-Demand Bid Performance Max 2 Hour 2pm-6pm Avg DBP Baseline 8/30/071110,85010,67410,416 Date of DBP Event Number of Participating Sites Estimated Load Shed (kW) Actual as Percent ofDBP Baseline Actual Load Shed (kW ) 98%

16 16 AutoDR Customer CPP Performance Average CCP Peak Load Reduction 8 % w/AutoDR -1% w/o AutoDR C/I Customer on CPP With and Without AutoDR

17 17 AutoDR Customer Performance / Cost

18 18 Contact Information Demand Response Research Center - http://drrc.lbl.gov/ Roger Levy, Program Development and Outreach Phone: 916-487-0227 Email: RogerL47@aol.com Roger Levy, Program Development and Outreach Phone: 916-487-0227 Email: RogerL47@aol.com Mary Ann Piette, Director Phone: 510-486-6286 Email: mapiette@lbl.gov Mary Ann Piette, Director Phone: 510-486-6286 Email: mapiette@lbl.gov Greg Wikler Global Energy Partners, LLC Tel: 925-284-3780 Email: gwikler@gepllc.com Greg Wikler Global Energy Partners, LLC Tel: 925-284-3780 Email: gwikler@gepllc.com Sila Kiliccote, Senior Scientific Engineering Associate Phone: 510-495-2615 Email: skiliccote@lbl.gov Sila Kiliccote, Senior Scientific Engineering Associate Phone: 510-495-2615 Email: skiliccote@lbl.gov Ed Koch Chief Technology Officer, Akuacom Phone: 415-256-2582 Email: ed@akuacom.com Ed Koch Chief Technology Officer, Akuacom Phone: 415-256-2582 Email: ed@akuacom.com Open AutoDR Communication Standards - http://drrc.lbl.gov/openadr/

19 19 In facilities with multiple space-conditioning zones for comfort heating or cooling, each controlled by an individual thermostatic control, authorized personnel shall have the capability to perform Global Temperature Adjustment (GTA) of the set points of all zones simultaneously from a single location. The centrally generated GTA command shall cause the thermostatic control of each individual zone to increase cooling set points by at least 3º F and decrease heating set points by at least 3º F. EXCEPTION to Section 122 (b) 4: Systems with stand-alone thermostats that are not connected via an Energy Management and Control System (EMCS) communication network. Building Standard GLOBAL TEMPERATURE SETBACK


Download ppt "1 Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand Response Research Center Progress Report Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards A Demand."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google