Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER."— Presentation transcript:

1 Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER

2 www. Clinical trial results.org PROSPER 5,804 high-risk elderly patients  Age 70–82 years  Pre-existing vascular disease (coronary, cerebral, or peripheral)  High-risk for vascular disease (smoking, hypertension, or diabetes)  Total cholesterol 4.0–9.0 mmol/L  Triglyceride < 6.0 mmol/L 5,804 high-risk elderly patients  Age 70–82 years  Pre-existing vascular disease (coronary, cerebral, or peripheral)  High-risk for vascular disease (smoking, hypertension, or diabetes)  Total cholesterol 4.0–9.0 mmol/L  Triglyceride < 6.0 mmol/L Pravastatin 40 mg per day n = 2,891 Pravastatin 40 mg per day n = 2,891 Placebo n = 2,913 Placebo n = 2,913 Endpoints:  Primary – composite of coronary death, non- fatal myocardial infarction, and fatal or non- fatal stroke Endpoints:  Primary – composite of coronary death, non- fatal myocardial infarction, and fatal or non- fatal stroke Lancet 2002; 360: 1623–30 Average follow-up = 3.2 years

3 www. Clinical trial results.org P=0.014 PROSPER: Clinical Events* Stroke P=0.006 Pravastatin Placebo P=0.047 P=0.043 CV Death / MI / Stroke CV Death / MI * Mean follow-up = 3.2 years Lancet 2002; 360: 1623–30 CV Death Pravastatin Placebo Pravastatin Placebo Pravastatin Placebo

4 www. Clinical trial results.org P = 0.02 Any New Cancer PROSPER: Safety Events Lancet 2002; 360: 1623–30 Pravastatin Placebo The major safety concern was the increased rate of any new cancer in the pravastatin arm However, in a meta-analysis of statin randomized placebo- controlled trials, treatment with either pravastatin (hazard ratio 1.06, p=0.20) or any statin (HR 1.02, p=0.32) was not associated with an excess risk of cancer The major safety concern was the increased rate of any new cancer in the pravastatin arm However, in a meta-analysis of statin randomized placebo- controlled trials, treatment with either pravastatin (hazard ratio 1.06, p=0.20) or any statin (HR 1.02, p=0.32) was not associated with an excess risk of cancer

5 www. Clinical trial results.org PROSPER : Summary The PROSPER trial was the first major study to show a benefit with a lipid-lowering agent specifically in high-risk elderly patients –The primary endpoint of CV Death / MI / stroke was reduced significantly in the pravastatin arm –All components of the endpoint except stroke showed a benefit with pravastatin –The major safety concern was the increased rate of any cancer in the pravastatin arm, which was not confirmed in a meta-analysis The PROSPER trial was the first major study to show a benefit with a lipid-lowering agent specifically in high-risk elderly patients –The primary endpoint of CV Death / MI / stroke was reduced significantly in the pravastatin arm –All components of the endpoint except stroke showed a benefit with pravastatin –The major safety concern was the increased rate of any cancer in the pravastatin arm, which was not confirmed in a meta-analysis


Download ppt "Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google