We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAvery Duffy
Modified over 3 years ago
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 8 Determining the Reliability and Validity and Interpretation of a Measure in the Study Population
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Random and systematic errors (bias). Source: Adapted, with permission, from Atkins (2000). FIGURE 8.1 random error
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Distributions of diseased (D) and nondiseased individuals, shown as the probability density function, for a diagnostic test. If a test value of 1 is used to classify diseased from nondiseased, the sensitivity (the shaded area under the diseased distribution A ) is 72%, and specificity (the shaded area under the nondiseased distribution B ) is 84%. Source: Reproduced, with permission, from Zou et al. (2007) and Mauri et al. (2005). FIGURE 8.2
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Receiver operating curves plots sensitivity (true positive rate) versus 1-specificity (false negative rate). A perfect test (gold standard) is curve A ; the area under the curve (AUC) is 100%. Curve B is like a typical test; the AUC is 85%. C is the chance line (AUC of 50%); a test on line C is no better than chance alone. The most accurate tests approach curve A and have an AUC close to 100%. Source: Reproduced, with permission, from Zou et al. (2007). FIGURE 8.3
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Receiver operating curve comparing the accuracy of using white blood cell counts (WBC), percent lymphocytes, and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) for predicting pertussis among 141 infants tested for pertussis using a PCR test. The area under the curve for ALC was 81% (95% CI: 72%, 90%). Source: Adapted, with permission, from Guinto-Ocampo et al. (2008). FIGURE
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 6 Molecular Tools.
GerstmanChapter 41 Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
Darlene Goldstein 29 January 2003 Receiver Operating Characteristic Methodology.
1 Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests Reliability: kappa coefficient Criterion validity: –“Gold” or criterion/reference standard –Sensitivity,
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 5 A Primer of Molecular Biology.
Screening. “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...” “...sort out.
Diagnostic Metrics Week 2 Video 3. Different Methods, Different Measures Today we’ll continue our focus on classifiers Later this week we’ll discuss.
Shibing Deng Pfizer, Inc. Efficient Outlier Identification in Lung Cancer Study.
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
Performance measures Morten Nielsen, CBS, Department of Systems Biology, DTU.
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
1 Evaluating Model Performance Lantz Ch 10 Wk 5, Part 2 Right – Graphing is often used to evaluate results from different variations of an algorithm. Depending.
IB Chemistry Chapter 11, Measurement & Data Processing Mr. Pruett.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Evaluation of Screening and Diagnostic Tests.
Laboratory Medicine: Basic QC Concepts M. Desmond Burke, MD.
EXAMPLE 1 Find a normal probability SOLUTION The probability that a randomly selected x -value lies between – 2σ and is the shaded area under the normal.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Procalcitonin Use to Predict Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infants Milcent K, Faesch.
Random Thoughts 2012 (COMP 066) Jan-Michael Frahm Jared Heinly.
Chapter 68 Chapter 68 Fracture Risk Assessment: The Development and Application of FRAX ® Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, PhD, MBA Professor at MBG (Molecular Biology) Lab. of Gene Expression, Molecular Diagnosis and Modern Therapeutics,
Evaluating Results of Learning Blaž Zupan
Lecture 4: Assessing Diagnostic and Screening Tests Reading: Gordis - Chapter 4 Lilienfeld and Stolley - Chapter 6, pp
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Probability and Calculus Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc.
Determining the Size of a Sample 1 Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Using Bayesian Analysis Part of an Undergraduate Research course Chantal D. Larose.
How do we delay disease progress once it has started? Epidemiology matters: a new introduction to methodological foundations Chapter 13.
1 Chapter 10 Screening for Disease. 2 Terminology ReliabilityagreementReliability ≡ agreement of ratings/diagnoses, “reproducibility” –Inter-rater reliability.
Chapter 85 Chapter 85 Parathyroid Hormone Treatment for Osteoporosis Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing and Comparing Classification Algorithms Introduction Resampling and Cross Validation Measuring Error Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing.
TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS Tom Sensky Teaching EBM/EBMH St Hughs College Oxford September 2005.
BASIC STATISTICS: AN OXYMORON? (With a little EPI thrown in…) URVASHI VAID MD, MS AUG 2012.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 7 Omics Analyses in Molecular Epidemiologic Studies.
Performance measures Morten Nielsen, CBS, BioCentrum, DTU.
Statistical Concepts Basic Principles An Overview of Today’s Class What: Inductive inference on characterizing a population Why : How will doing this allow.
(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Random Variables and Probability Distributions.
Instructor Resource Chapter 2 Copyright © Scott B. Patten, Permission granted for classroom use with Epidemiology for Canadian Students: Principles,
Evaluating Predictive Models Niels Peek Department of Medical Informatics Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam.
1 Epidemiological Measures I Screening for Disease.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests Presenter: Akash Ranjan Moderator: Dr Chetna Maliye.
Reliability of Screening Tests RELIABILITY: The extent to which the screening test will produce the same or very similar results each time it is administered.
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
Chapter 5 Some Key Ingredients for Inferential Statistics: The Normal Curve, Probability, and Population Versus Sample.
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
Timothy Wiemken, PhD MPH Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Tests.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.