We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAvery Duffy
Modified over 4 years ago
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 8 Determining the Reliability and Validity and Interpretation of a Measure in the Study Population
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Random and systematic errors (bias). Source: Adapted, with permission, from Atkins (2000). FIGURE 8.1 random error
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Distributions of diseased (D) and nondiseased individuals, shown as the probability density function, for a diagnostic test. If a test value of 1 is used to classify diseased from nondiseased, the sensitivity (the shaded area under the diseased distribution A ) is 72%, and specificity (the shaded area under the nondiseased distribution B ) is 84%. Source: Reproduced, with permission, from Zou et al. (2007) and Mauri et al. (2005). FIGURE 8.2
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Receiver operating curves plots sensitivity (true positive rate) versus 1-specificity (false negative rate). A perfect test (gold standard) is curve A ; the area under the curve (AUC) is 100%. Curve B is like a typical test; the AUC is 85%. C is the chance line (AUC of 50%); a test on line C is no better than chance alone. The most accurate tests approach curve A and have an AUC close to 100%. Source: Reproduced, with permission, from Zou et al. (2007). FIGURE 8.3
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Receiver operating curve comparing the accuracy of using white blood cell counts (WBC), percent lymphocytes, and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) for predicting pertussis among 141 infants tested for pertussis using a PCR test. The area under the curve for ALC was 81% (95% CI: 72%, 90%). Source: Adapted, with permission, from Guinto-Ocampo et al. (2008). FIGURE 8.4 1 -
Chapter 5 Some Key Ingredients for Inferential Statistics: The Normal Curve, Probability, and Population Versus Sample.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 5 A Primer of Molecular Biology.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Molecular Tools and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Betsy Foxman Chapter 7 Omics Analyses in Molecular Epidemiologic Studies.
Chapter 68 Chapter 68 Fracture Risk Assessment: The Development and Application of FRAX ® Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Chapter 85 Chapter 85 Parathyroid Hormone Treatment for Osteoporosis Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Chapter 77 - Ischemic Renal Disease Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Clinical Effectiveness: Interpreting test results Nick Price 17 th October 2006.
TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
Review bootstrap and permutation
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
SCREENING CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor
Diagnostic Metrics Week 2 Video 3. Different Methods, Different Measures Today we’ll continue our focus on classifiers Later this week we’ll discuss.
How do we delay disease progress once it has started?
Shibing Deng Pfizer, Inc. Efficient Outlier Identification in Lung Cancer Study.
Welcome to PHYS 225a Lab Introduction, class rules, error analysis Julia Velkovska.
The Research Consumer Evaluates Measurement Reliability and Validity
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.