Presentation on theme: "HANDBOOK ON GREEN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS"— Presentation transcript:
1HANDBOOK ON GREEN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Chapter 6: Intercell Interference Coordination: Towards A Greener Cellular NetworkDuy T. Ngo, Duy H. N. Nguyen, and Tho Le-NgocMcGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
2IntroductionIntercell interference (ICI) is a critical issue in cellular communication systems.With universal frequency reuse, it is even more urgent to find effective solutions to this problem.Energy efficiency is crucial:Environmental effects of operating a huge number of cellular networks with high energy consumptionBattery-powered user terminals have relatively short operating timeTowards a greener design, effective coordination of the intercell interference is key toMinimize the carbon footprintMaximize the overall network performance
3IntroductionCell coordination offers tremendous advantages over the traditional approaches that typically treat interference on a per-cell basis.This chapter reviews the state-of-the-art techniques that manage the intercell interference in multicell networksHomogeneous networksCoordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP)Small-cell heterogeneous networks (femtocells)Energy-efficient interference coordination
4Frequency Reuse and Interference Issue in Homogeneous Cellular Systems Broadcast nature of wireless medium results in the fundamental problem of interference.Fractional frequency reuseReduced spectral efficiencyUniversal frequency reuseMore spectrally efficientOnly if intercell interference (ICI) is properly control.CDMA systemsAll users (UEs) share the same spectrum and are interfered.OFDMA systemsJoint subchannel assignment and power control is required to maximize system performance and reduce ICI.
5BS Coordination for Interference Management in Homogeneous Multicell Systems Conventionally, interference is usually controlled on a per-cell basis.The ICI is treated as background noise by each cell, and the base station (BS) of which has no intention to control the interference induced to other cells.Base station (BS) coordination is a more effective means to mitigate cochannel interference in multicell networks.Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) takes advantage of the inter-cell transmissions to enhance the overall system performance.
6Classification and Design Requirements for CoMP Depending on the extent of coordination among cells, CoMP schemes can be classified into 3 categories:Joint Signal Processing (JP): multiple BSs are transmitting/receiving data signals to/from the UEs.Interference Coordination (IC): each UE transmits/receives data signals to/from its single serving BS. ICI is jointly controlled.Interference Aware (IA): ICI is not controlled, but is utilized to adjust the transmitting/receiving strategy at each BS. This scheme is a strategic noncooperative game (SNG).Different CoMP schemes impose different requirements onData and signaling exchanges.Channel state information (CSI) knowledge needed at the coordinated BSs.
7Co-channel Deployment of Heterogeneous Small-cell Networks Key BenefitsHigher capacity via larger area spectral efficiencyBetter coverage with lower power consumptionOffload traffic for macrocellMore cost-effective compared to cell-partitioning approachSmall cells (i.e. femtocells) deployed at a home, connected to backhaul via residential wireline links (e.g. DSL).Range of less than 50m and serve a dozen active users
8Cross-tier Interference in Femtocell Deployment Scenario A:A victim cell-edge macrocell user (MUE) is strongly interfered by the downlink transmission of a nearby femtocell BS.Scenario B:An MUE located far away from its serving macrocell BS transmits at high power in the uplink to compensate the path losses.This may jam the transmission of a nearby victim femtocell user (FUE).Cross-tier interference can be severe and hard to control
9Challenges in Managing Interference for Femtocell Networks It is more challenging to mitigate inteference in femtocell than in traditional homogeneous settings.Unplanned deployment: Femtocells are deployed randomly without network planning that is normally taken place. Femtocell BSs and users can be moved or switched on/off at any time.Access priority: Prioritized MUEs, the spectrum owner, need to be protected from cross-tier interference induced by lower-tier FUEs.Limited control/signaling: Residential network infrastructure only provide limited capacity for the exchange of control and signaling information. Delay can be a major issue.
10Interference Management in Femtocell Networks: Design Requirements Femtocell deployment: A paradigm shift from the traditional centralized macrocell approaches to a more uncoordinated and autonomous solutionAvailable centralized solutions may not be applicable.Distributed interference management approaches are preferable in practical applications so thatMUEs are robustly protected with their QoS requirements always maintained; andFUEs effectively exploit residual network capacity to optimize their own performance.
11Interference Management Techniques in CDMA-based Homogeneous Cellular Networks (1) Power control is effective for CDMA-based systemsSINR/Power balancing: can be implemented distributively, but diverges with infeasible SINR targets:Game-theoretical approach: users selfishly optimize their own performance, giving Nash equilibrium (NE), but not Pareto-efficient.Game with pricing can substantially enhance the NE.
12Interference Management Techniques in CDMA-based Homogeneous Cellular Networks (2) Using pricing scheme that is linearly proportional to SINR, i.e., , NE is unique and Pareto-efficient for single-cell settings.Observe: SINRs should not be fixed but adjusted to the extent that the system capacity can still support.A high SINR is translated into better throughput and reliabilityA low SINR implies lower data rates.Jointly optimize SINR and power to achieve Pareto optimality byRe-parametrization via the left Perron-Frobenius eigenvectorsA locally computable ascent direction
13Interference Management Techniques in OFDMA-based Homogeneous Cellular Networks (1) Optimize over 2 dimensionsJoint subchannel assignment and power allocationTypical design problem:Common approach:Step 1: Given fixed power allocation P, find optimal subchannel assignment i*Step 2: Given fixed subchannel assignment i, find optimal power P*Go back to Step 1 and repeat until convergence.
14Interference Management Techniques in OFDMA-based Homogeneous Cellular Networks (2) Game theoretical approach with “virtual referee”This referee mandatorily changes the game rules whenever needed, and helps improve the outcome of the game.Transmit power of UEs with unfavorable channel conditions are reduced.UEs generating significant interference to others may be prohibited from using certain subchannels.Low-complexity and heuristic approachesAffordable computational complexityReduced feedback overheadSuitable for practical applications
15Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP) Consider a network with Q cells and K users.CoMP allows the data signals to a UE to be sent from multiple BSs.CoMP utilizes space division multiple access (SDMA)Each BS can send data signals to multiple connected UEs by means of precodingBeamformer for UE i at BS q.Assuming each UE is assigned to a known subset of BSs.
16CoMP for Power Minimization (1) Interference Aware (IA)Each UE is assigned to only one BSBS adjusts its beamformers to ensure a set of target SINR at its connected UEs.CoMP under IA scheme is a strategic noncooperative game.Players: BSsAdmissible set of strategies: Constraints on the SINR at each UE.Utility function: Transmit power at the BSsThe beam patterns are always unchanged, regardless the ICI power allocation game.Characterization of the NE: existence and uniqueness.Fully distributed implementation
17CoMP for Power Minimization (2) Joint Signal Processing (JP) and Interference Coordination (IC)Joint optimization to minimize transmit power across coordinated BSSolution is Pareto-optimal.Convex optimization, easy to find the optimal solution.Multicell problem can be reformulated as a single cell problem well-known algorithms can be adopted.Drawbacks:Centralized implementationSignaling and synchronization between BSs
18CoMP for Power Minimization (3) Consider a new gameDistributed implementation as in IA schemeOptimal solution as in IC schemeNew utility function with pricing:where : pricing factor charged on ICI caused by BS q to its unconnected UEs IA scheme with pricingUnder the right pricing scheme, the new game approaches optimal performance offered by IC scheme.
19CoMP for Power Minimization (4) CoMP is more power-efficient than frequency reuse scheme.
20CoMP for Rate Maximization (1) Interference Aware:Each UE is assigned to only one BSBS adjusts its beamformers to maximize the data rate to its connected UEs.CoMP under IA scheme is a strategic noncooperative game.Players: BSsAdmissible set of strategies: Power constraint on the beamformersUtility function: Data rate at the BSsNonconcave utility function difficult to analyzeApply zero-forcing (ZF) at each BSSimplify the game into a power iterative waterfilling gameEasier to character of the NE: existence and uniqueness
21CoMP for Rate Maximization (2) Joint Signal Processing (JS) and Interference Coordination (IC)Joint optimization to maximize the data rate to all the UEsNonconvex optimization problemDifficult to find global optimumApproximation technique to find locally optimal solutionsSolution approaches are usually centralized.IA scheme with pricing: new utility function with pricingUnder the right pricing, the network sum rate monotonically increases to a local maximum.
22CoMP for Rate Maximization (3) CoMP extracts higher sum-rate than frequency reuse scheme.
23Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for CDMA-based Femtocells (1) Joint power and admission control for distributed interference management with dynamic pricing combined with admission controlNet utility for MUE I to robustly protect the performance of all active MUEs:Update of power for MUE i:Net utility for FUE j to balance the achieved throughput and the power expenditure:
24Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for CDMA-based Femtocells (2) For non-congested network, the proposed algorithm quickly converges to an equilibrium with the target SINRs achieved for all MUEs.For congested network, admission control can remove some FUEs, resulting in a noticeable growth in SINRs of the remaining FUEs.Removal of FUEs does not significantly affect the transmit powers and SINRs of MUEs.
25Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for CDMA-based Femtocells (3) Using convex optimization, distributed joint power and SINR allocation is devised such thatAll users attain their respective SINRs that are always optimal in Pareto sense,Every MUE i is protected with .Every FUE j has its utility globally maximized.Key steps:Characterize Pareto-optimal boundary of the SINR feasible regionUse load-spillage parametrization to realize every SINR point lying on such a boundaryDetermine a unique operating SINR point, based upon the specific network utility function of FUEs and the minimum SINR requirements of MUEs,Adapt transmit power according to Foschini-Miljanic's algorithm to attain such a design target.
26Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for CDMA-based Femtocells (4) Proposed algorithm converges to global optima for different utilities.Performance of the femtocell network optimizedMinimum SINRs prescribed for MUEs always guaranteedMUE index12345678910Target SINR1.5781.5071.4401.3761.3151.2561.2001.1471.0951.047Achieved SINR
27Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for OFDMA-based Femtocells (1) Joint allocation of resource block and transmit powerUtility of each femtocell BS includes system capacity and other sources of interferences (i.e., femtocell to macrocell, macrocell to femtocell, and femtocell to femtocell).Formulated game belongs to the class of exact potential game, shown to always converge to a NE when a best response adaptive strategy is applied.Solution is an iterative process:Step 1: Optimal resource block allocation is determined given a transmit power policy.Step 2: Waterfilling allocation of power for femtocells is computed for a fixed resource block allocation.Go back to Step 1 and repeat until convergence.
28Advanced Interference Coordination Techniques for OFDMA-based Femtocells (2) Joint subchannel and transmit power allocation schemeFemto BSs are allowed to transmit on the same subchannel with MUEs as long as interference is limited to an acceptable levelMaximizing capacity of cognitive radio network (e.g., femtocell)ICI among different cognitive radio cells is controlled.Lagrangian dual method:Original design problem is decomposed into multiple subproblems in the dual domainEach problem is solved by an efficient algorithm.Duality gap approaches zero when the number of OFDMA subchannels is sufficiently large.Proposed solution outperforms the fixed subchannel allocation scheme.
29Tradeoff between Spectral and Energy Efficiency Spectral Efficiency (SE)Energy Efficiency (EE)With circuit power PcTradeoff relation:
30Energy-efficient Interference Management for Multicarrier Multicell Networks Given interference power on subchannel k, data rate of user i across all subchannels isEE of user i:Given the power allocation of all other users, P-i, each user i is required to solve the best-response problem:As is strictly quasiconcave in Pi, there exists at least one NE in this power control game.Under certain conditions, the NE is unique in frequency-selective channels
31Energy-efficient Joint Power Control and BS Assignment in CDMA-based Multicell Networks Utility of user i received at its assigned BS ai:Two-dimensional space:Transmit power PiBase station aiPower control game with a linear pricing:Original problem is reduced to:Improvement in EE with linear pricing is above 25%
32Chapter SummaryTwo conflicting goals in cellular network deployment: spectral v.s energy efficiencyWith universal frequency reuse, new communication paradigms are needed to proactively deal with intercell interference (ICI).Effective coordinating of ICI is the key to optimizing the two design goals towards a greener cellular network.For conventional homogeneous networks, CoMP schemes efficiently coordinate or even take advantage of the ICI.For heterogenous networks, advanced interference management mechanisms help mitigate cross-tier interference in mixed macrocell/femtocell deployment.Current advances in ICI coordination improve the energy efficiency of cellular networks while maintaining a good tradeoff with spectral efficiency goal.
33Some Potential Research Directions Design CoMP schemes that deal with quantization errors, fast-varying channels and CSI feedback delayTradeoff between achieving optimal performance and incurring low computational complexity in CoMPDistributed implementation of robust CoMP schemes with only local CSI requiredAddress energy-efficiency criterion in standardization of CoMP techniquesDetermine the optimal cell sizes and locations to deploy femtocell BSs, taking into account the energy expended for the backhaul and signaling overheadWith cooperative relays, power-efficient resource allocation techniques (e.g., energy-efficient modulation, selective relaying) should be devised and adapted.