Presentation on theme: "Multicultural Education: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives"— Presentation transcript:
1Multicultural Education: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives Chapter 2
2Historical Perspectives on Pluralism We have been different from the beginning.European immigrants met highly developed civilizations already here.English culture became dominant because of a slightly more tolerant attitude and their own need for religious freedom.
3Industrialization: Immigration and Religious Pluralism The first type of difference to influence schooling was economic (social class).The common school was largely a response to differences between rich and poor.As the industrial revolution grew and spread, new immigrants from Europe brought Catholicism—and thus, religious difference—into a largely Protestant country. As a result, battles were waged not around race or ethnicity, but around the issue of religion.
4The Civil War: Freedmen’s Schools and the Issue of Race Race became important to schooling after the Civil War.The Freedmen’s Bureau established schools for blacks in the South, a process that was characterized by the same kind of violence as had characterized the development of Catholic schools in the North.
5Segregation and the Law Black children remained in segregated schools that were both underfunded and often open only part of the year.In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that “separate but equal” schools for blacks and whites was constitutional.
6The Civil Rights Movement and the Schools Beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the Civil Rights Movement gained momentum during the 1960s and 1970s, resulting in antidiscrimination laws involving not only race, but also differences in language, gender, and disability.In education, the chief concerns were access to and equity in to public education.
7Historical Perspectives on Multicultural Education In the history of public schooling two approaches to difference, based on two different ideologies, have been utilized:Anglo-conformity, or the assimilationist modelMulticulturalism, or the pluralist model
8Anglo-Conformity, or the Assimilationist Model From 1860–1920, 37 million immigrants became naturalized citizens.An important task of schooling was thought to be turning these new citizens into “Americans” as quickly as possible.Assimilationists believed that one’s identification with one’s ethnic group should be short-lived and temporary.cont.
9Assimilationists believed that in order for society to advance, individuals must give up their ethnic identities, languages, and ideologies in favor of the norms and values of the larger, national society.The goal for assimilationists is to make it possible for everyone to be “melted” into a homogeneous whole.
10The “Model” of American Culture “Real” Americans are:Mostly white, mostly middle class (or trying to be)Mostly Protestant but sometimes CatholicHeterosexualWork hard, eat well, stand on their own two feet, expect their children to behave themselvesWash themselves a good deal and generally try to smell “good”Patriotic, charitable (as long as those receiving the charity try to “shape up”)Believe in “good, old fashioned, common sense” not what is written in books by educated people
11The Importance of Schooling in Producing “Real” Americans Those who do not “fit” the dominant model of “American” must be encouraged, or forced, to reflect these characteristics, because such differences make them dangerous to the maintenance of America as it is “supposed” to be.cont.
12The schools are the chosen institution to take on the task of making children who are culturally different into “American” children, that is to teach them the proper way to behave, think, and value so they will fit harmoniously into the monoculturalist’s culture.Large urban school districts formed separate classes or repositories for “unrulies” and for “backward” or “dull” students because they did not “fit.” Special education emerged as a separate system within the public schools.
13Multiculturalism, or the Pluralist Ideology In contrast to the assimilationist ideology, a small group of philosophers and writers came forward with the notions of cultural pluralism and cultural democracy.Pluralists assert that immigrant groups (and, by extension, all identity groups) are entitled to maintain their distinctions within the larger American society.
14Pluralist Assumptions One’s social groups are essential to one’s sense of belonging and psychological support.It is through one’s primary groups that one learns language, as well as attitudes and values.These groups are so important that their interests should be promoted and recognized.The schools are the chosen institution to take on this task.Pluralists believe that the more congruent the school experience is with the experiences of the child, the better the child’s chance of success.
15Legislative and Judicial Landmarks A number of legislative and judicial landmarks have addressed issues of access and equity in terms of:Issues of raceIssues of religionIssues of languageIssues of genderIssues of disabilityIssues of social class
16Issues of RacePlessy v. Ferguson (1896)–“separate but equal schooling” is constitutionalBrown v. Board of Education (1954)– “separate schooling is inherently unequal, and therefore, unconstitutional”Brown v. Board of Education II (1955)– schools must desegregate with “all deliberate speed”
17Implementing Brown v. Board Green v. School Board of New Kent County (1968)—“freedom of choice” plans could not be used to avoid desegregationSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)—authorized mandatory busingMilliken v. Bradley I and II (1973, 1977)—Detroit schools not allowed to mandate cross-district busing (usually thought to be the beginning of the end of busing as a strategy for desegregation)
18Issues of ReligionPierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)— legitimized parochial and other private schoolsEngle v. Vitale (1962)—mandatory prayer violates separation of church and stateAbington School District v. Schempp (1963)—public schools cannot begin the day with required prayer or Bible readingcont.
19Epperson v. State of Arkansas (1968)— schools cannot ban the teaching of evolution Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)—no state can require that the Biblical version of creation be taughtBoard of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990)—students may organize and participate in Christian clubs that meet before or after school hours
20Issues of LanguageBilingual Education Act (1968)—provided funding for bilingual education programsDiana v. State Board of Education (1968)— tests for eligibility for special education services must be given in the dominant language of the studentLau v. Nichols (1974)—affirmative steps must be taken by a school district to rectify language deficienciescont.
21Keyes v. School District No Keyes v. School District No. 1 (1977)—bilingual education is compatible with desegregationMartin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School Children v. Ann Arbor School District Board of Education (1979)—legitimated Black English as a dialectProposition 227 (1998, California)—required schools to teach Limited English Proficient (LEP) students in special classes, mostly in English, for not more than one year
22Issues of GenderTitle IX, Education Amendments (1972)—prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in schools receiving federal aidFranklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (1992)— schools receiving federal funds can be sued for sex discrimination and harassmentAlida Star Gebser and Alida Jean Mccullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District (1998)— made it difficult to recover damages from a school district for sexual harassment
23Issues of DisabilityEducation of All Handicapped Children Act (1976)— made schools responsible for education “in the least restrictive environment”Honig v. Doe (1988)—special education students who are disruptive may not be suspended or expelled without due processIndividuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 1990)—extended services to age 21Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, 1992)— extended rights of people with disabilities to the private sector
24Issues of Social Class and School Funding Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965)—provides funding for Title I and for Head StartElementary and Secondary Education Act (1981)Rose v. Council for a Better Education (1989)—Kentucky Supreme Court declares property tax basis for school funding unconstitutionalcont.
25Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1991) Elementary and Secondary Education Act (2001)—No Child Left Behind Act vastly increases federal role in public education
26Public Responses to Multicultural and Bilingual Education Reforms One group consists of those who advocate programs such as multicultural and bilingual education.Another group consists of those who oppose any special programs, either because:they believe “traditional” schooling provides sufficient upward mobility, orthey believe pluralistic approaches will destroy the country.cont.
27A third group asserts that pluralism in education should not be viewed as either a remedial form of education or an effort at reparation, but rather as the long-overdue affirmation of a social reality.
28Theoretical Perspectives on Multicultural Education Sleeter and Grant propose five types of multicultural education:Teaching the culturally differentHuman relations approachSingle-group studiesInclusive multicultural educationEducation that is multicultural and social reconstructionist
29Teaching the Culturally Different These approaches attempt to counter a perceived cultural deficiencyDevelop competence in the dominant cultureMaintain self-identity and retain own cultural identityMay mask an assimilationist ideology
30Human Relations Approach Assumes multicultural education is a means by which students of different backgrounds learn to communicate more effectively with one another while learning to feel good about themselvesThis is a fairly limited approach, and does not include attention to curriculum expansion and empowerment.
31Single-group StudiesInstruction that focuses on the experiences and cultures of one specific groupAfrican-American History, Chicano Literature, and Native American Culture are some examples.While important, such efforts may tend to reinforce a single perspective, while paying less attention to multiple perspectives.
32Inclusive Multicultural Education Places multicultural education in the larger context of overall curriculum and school reformFocuses on the strength and value of diversity in a pluralistic nationExpanded attention to the differences in gender, religion, geographical region, and disability
33Education That Is Multicultural and Social Reconstructionist This approach goes beyond multicultural education by helping students critically analyze the larger social forces involved in discrimination and oppression.Believes that the entire education program should be designed to address the needs of diverse groups regardless of race, ethnicity, culture, religion, exceptionality, or genderSeeks to prepare students not only to think in multiple ways, but to be willing and able to help bring about social justice in the society
34Something to Think About The history of multicultural education has its roots in a debate between those who think that American schooling should provide a common education to all children based on the history and culture of European Americans and Western civilization; and those who think that American schooling must recognize and affirm the rich historical and cultural backgrounds and perspectives of a population that has always been diverse and is becoming ever more so. The debate continues.