We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTrinity Lockhart
Modified over 2 years ago
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 16 Juvenile Corrections: End of an Era? 1
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill A Brief History The English and American juvenile justice systems use the doctrine of parens patriae. Latin term that refers to the state as guardian of minors and incompetent people Historically, juvenile offenders in England were confined with adults. In 1704, John Howard introduced a Roman institutional model for juvenile offenders. American colonists brought his ideas to the new world. Reformers tailored Howards ideas to create houses of refuge, reform schools, and industrial schools for juveniles. 2
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill A Brief History – Continued In 1825, the first legally chartered American custodial institution for juvenile offenders, the New York House of Refuge, was established by penal reformer Thomas Eddy, education reformer John Griscom, and the Society for the Prevention of Pauperism. The Lyman School, the first state-sponsored reform school, opened in Massachusetts in Reform School – a penal institution to which especially young or first-time offenders are committed for training and reformation 3
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill The Juvenile Court People ex rel. OConnell v. Turner (1870)– the Illinois Supreme Court began the movement toward creating a separate juvenile court That movement came to fruition in 1899, when the Illinois legislature established the nations first juvenile court in Cook County (Chicago) 4
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Juvenile Euphemisms Delinquents Taken into custody Petition is filed Held on petition Adjudicatory hearing Finding Disposition Adjudicated Training school Aftercare Criminals Arrested Charge filed Indicted Trial Verdict Sentence Convicted Prison Parole 5
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Landmark Cases Kent v. United States (1966) – in cases involving transfer of jurisdiction, juveniles are entitled to certain essential due process rights, such as a hearing, an attorney, access to records, a written statement of reasons for the transfer In re Gault (1967) – juvenile offenders have the right to reasonable notice of charges, appointed counsel, question witnesses, and protection against self-incrimination 6
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Landmark Cases – Continued In re Winship (1970) – the guilty beyond a reasonable doubt standard should be required in all delinquency adjudications McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (1971) – the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require jury trials in juvenile court Breed v. Jones (1975) – the double jeopardy protection applies to juvenile adjudication proceedings Shall v. Martin (1984) – preventive detention may be used for juveniles 7
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Juvenile Crime Delinquent offenses - acts committed by juveniles that, if committed by adults, could result in criminal prosecution Status offenses - acts that are law violations only for juveniles such as running away, truancy, or ungovernability Sometimes referred to as incorrigibility or being beyond parental control 8
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill The Juvenile Justice Process The three phases of the juvenile justice process are: Intake Adjudication Disposition 9
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Intake The first stage of the juvenile justice process. A court-appointed officer reviews the case and recommends a course of action dismissal, informal disposition, formal disposition, or transfer to adult criminal court 10
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Detention Detention Hearing – a judicial review of the intake officers detention decision Juvenile detention facility – a facility for keeping juvenile offenders in secure custody, as necessary, through various stages of the juvenile justice process Guardian Ad Litem – a person appointed by the juvenile court, often defense counsel, to serve as a special guardian for the youth being processed through the juvenile justice system 11
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Adjudication The process by which a court arrives at a final disposition in a case; also the second stage in the juvenile justice process The court decides whether the offender is formally responsible for (guilty of) the alleged offense Equivalent to the trial in adult criminal cases 12
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Disposition The third stage of the juvenile justice process in which the court decides the disposition (sentence) for a juvenile case Equivalent to the sentencing of an adult offender Predisposition report – a report that documents (1) the juveniles background; (2) educational history; (3) information gathered from interviews with the juvenile, family members, and others; (4) available placement options; and (5) recommended dispositions 13
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Types of Dispositions Probation Commitment to group homes A non-secure residential facility for juveniles Residential treatment A residential facility that provides intensive treatment services to juveniles Boot camp Juvenile correctional institutions Blended sentencing A two-part (juvenile and adult) sentence in which the adult sentence may be waved if the offender complies with all provisions of the juvenile sentence 14
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Evidence-Based Practice and Juvenile Corrections Few studies have focused on reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders Most effective strategy for treating and rehabilitating juvenile offenders Prevention programming Continuum of pre-trial and sentencing placement options Services and sanctions Aftercare programs An example is the approach used by the California Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) 15
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Transfer Juveniles may be transferred to adult court under one of three provisions: Waiver Provisions – the juvenile court orders transfer of the case to adult criminal court Direct File Provisions – the prosecutor determines whether to initiate a case against a juvenile in juvenile court or in adult criminal court Statutory Exclusion Provisions – the adult criminal court jurisdiction for certain juvenile cases is established by state law 16
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Juvenile Correctional Facilities Juvenile corrections functions are placed in various state agencies by the different states. Operating budgets for the agencies ranged from $642 million (Florida) to about $10 million (North Dakota). Nationwide, the number of delinquency cases involving detention increased 42 percent between 1985 and 2002, from 231,400 to 329,
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Teen Courts Courts in which youths adjudicate and impose disposition for a juvenile offense Also called peer and youth courts Have become a popular alternative to the traditional juvenile court for young or first-time offenders 18
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Four Models of Teen Courts The Adult Judge model – an adult serves as judge and youth serve as attorneys and court staff The Youth Judge model – parallels the Adult Judge model, with the exception that a youth serves as judge The Tribunal model – youth attorneys present the case to a panel of three youth judges The Peer Jury model – uses no attorneys; the case is presented to the jury by a youth or adult and the jury questions the defendant 19
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Youth Gangs Gang: a criminal enterprise having an organizational structure, acting as a continuing criminal conspiracy, that employs violence and any other criminal activity to sustain itself Youth gang: a gang whose membership is generally comprised of people between the ages of 12 and 24 Street gang: an organized group of people on the street often engaged in significant illegitimate or criminal activity 20
© Prentice Hall 2008 Pearson Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, NJ Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger 1 Probation, Parole,
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY GUIDELINES Building on the Past to Design Future Courts of Excellence.
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Administrative Office Division of Probation Services Juvenile Drug Courts in West Virginia Michael B. Lacy, Director,
Criminal Justice : Process and Perspectives Chapter 16.
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry 1.
Pennsylvania Criminal Justice System Bucks County Technical High School Emergency Services Technology.
Criminal Justice The Courts: Structure and Participants Chapter 9.
THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR IN JUVENILE JUSTICE THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR IN JUVENILE JUSTICE Prepared by James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney,
Criminal Justice Today Chapter 12 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections Criminal Justice.
Chapter Twenty- Three: The Texas Judiciary, Law, and Due Process 1.
1 Marchman Act The Florida Substance Abuse Impairment Act.
YCJA Youth Sentencing December S.38(1) Purpose of Sentencing S. 38(1) The purpose of youth sentences is to hold a young person accountable for an.
Using Special Education Law In Family Court Cases Criminal Defense Institute June 2011 Joe Tulman Professor of Law
Civics: Government and Economics in Action 1 Chapter 20: Criminal and Juvenile Justice.
Criminal Justice Today Chapter 11 Sentencing Criminal Justice.
Welcome to Presentation Plus! Presentation Plus! Civics Today Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Developed by FSCreations, Inc., Cincinnati,
Criminal Justice Today Criminal Law Chapter 4 Criminal Justice.
The International Instruments Relevant to Juvenile Justice Administration.
D O M I C E A Transnational Project Funded by the European Union eveloping ffender anagement n orrections in urope This file introduces you to 1.
Chapter 22 Federal and State Government. Standards SS8CG2 – Analyze role of legislative branch SS8CG3 – Analyze role of executive branch SS8CG4 – Analyze.
WHAT IS CIVICS / GOVERNMENT?. SS8CG1 The student will describe the role of citizens under Georgias constitution. a. Explain the basic structure of the.
Unit 8 : Government Standards and Elements: SS8H12 (a. and c.) SS8CG1 SS8CG2 SS8CG3 SS8CG4 SS8CG5 SS8CG6.
Georgia State Government. WARM-UP 1.How many Constitutions has Georgia had? - When was the first state Constitution approved? - When was the first state.
1. This tutorial is designed to help parents, students, school staff and school administrators understand the relationship between the ABR and the LAD.
Chapter 1 Delinquency and the Juvenile Justice System.
Partners In Justice A Guide to the Criminal Justice System A Guide to the Criminal Justice System This project is supported by The Arc of North Carolina.
Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children.
The National People's Congress (NPC) The National People's Congress is the highest organ of State power in the People's Republic of China. Its main functions.
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia SS8CG6 the student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders.
Immigration Issues Impacting Child Welfare and Child Trafficking Howard Davidson, J.D. Director, ABA Center on Children and the Law American Bar Association.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.