Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Early treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer based on CA125 level alone

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Early treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer based on CA125 level alone"— Presentation transcript:

1 Early treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer based on CA125 level alone
versus delayed treatment based on conventional clinical indicators Results of the randomized MRC OV05 and EORTC trials Gordon Rustin (Mount Vernon Cancer Centre) and Maria van der Burg On behalf of all OV05 and Collaborators 31st May 2009

2 Ovarian Cancer 80% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse after first line chemotherapy Most of these patients will benefit from further therapy Serial measurement of circulating tumour markers have the potential for earlier detection of relapse It is unclear whether patients benefit from earlier treatment of relapse

3 Objective of Trial To investigate the benefit of early chemotherapy for relapsed ovarian cancer, based on a raised CA125 level alone, versus delayed chemotherapy based on conventional clinical indicators

4 Trial Design Ovarian cancer in complete remission
after first-line platinum based chemotherapy and a normal CA125 REGISTER Blinded CA125 measured every 3 months CA125>2 x upper limit of normal RANDOMISED Early treatment Clinician and patient informed Delayed treatment Clinician not informed, treatment delayed until clinically indicated

5 Inclusion criteria Histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary serous peritoneal carcinoma In complete remission with a normal CA125 following first-line platinum based chemotherapy Able to attend regular follow-up visits and have regular blood tests Local laboratory able to blind CA125 results and willing to participate in an approved quality assurance scheme Written informed consent

6 Outcome measures and sample size
Primary outcome measure Overall Survival Secondary outcome measures Time to second-line treatment Time to third-line treatment or death Quality of life Sample size To detect a 10% improvement in 2-year overall survival with early treatment (5% significance level and 85% power) We required 345 events (deaths from all causes) 1400 registered patients

7 Monthly registrations
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 May-96 Aug-96 Nov-96 Feb-97 May-97 Aug-97 Nov-97 Feb-98 May-98 Aug-98 Nov-98 Feb-99 May-99 Aug-99 Nov-99 Feb-00 May-00 Aug-00 Nov-00 Feb-01 May-01 Aug-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Aug-02 Nov-02 Feb-03 May-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Feb-04 May-04 Aug-04 Nov-04 Feb-05 May-05 Aug-05 EORTC MRC Total registered=1442 Number of registrations OV05 (55955) opened for recruitment May 1996 (May 1999) OV05/55955 closed to registrations 31st August 2005

8 Cumulative randomisations
100 200 300 400 500 600 Feb-97 Aug-97 Feb-98 Aug-98 Feb-99 Aug-99 Feb-00 Aug-00 Feb-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Aug-02 Feb-03 Aug-03 Feb-04 Aug-04 Feb-05 Aug-05 Feb-06 Aug-06 Feb-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Number of randomisations EORTC MRC Registrations closed OV05/55955 closed to randomisations 31st March 2008 CA125 unblinded for all patients after 1st October 2008

9 Trial Profile Registered patients N=1442 Non randomised patients
421 (29) CA125<2ULN and no relapse at trial closure 61 (4) Relapsed at same time as CA125>2ULN 213 (15) Relapsed without CA125>2ULN 56 (4) Died 133 (9) Patient withdrawal 29 (2) Other/unknown reasons Randomised N=529 (37%) Early treatment N=265 N=254 (96%) started second-line chemotherapy Delayed treatment N=264 N=233 (88%) started second-line chemotherapy

10 Baseline characteristics: All registered patients (N=1442)
Age Median (range) 60 (23-93) FIGO stage I II III IV 18% 15% 58% 9% WHO Performance Status 1 2 & 3 72% 27% 1% Histology Serous Endometroid Mucinous Clear cell Undifferentiated Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified Other 53% 17% 7% 6% 10%

11 Overall survival – all registered patients
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Proportion surviving 1442 1343 1162 963 749 533 357 Number at risk 12 24 36 48 60 72 Months since first line chemotherapy completed Median survival 70.8 months (95%CI = )

12 Randomised patients only

13 Baseline characteristics: All randomised patients (N=529)
Early Delayed Age Median (range) 60 (35-86) 61 (37-93) FIGO stage I II III IV 9% 11% 68% 12% 8% 10% 69% 13% WHO PS 1 2 & 3 29% 2% 75% 25% <1% Histology Serous Endometroid Mucinous Clear cell Undifferentiated Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified Other 66% 3% 4% 6% 1% 59% 15%

14 Second-line chemotherapy
Regimen administered Early N (%) Delayed Single agent platinum Combination platinum (no taxane) Platinum + taxane based Taxane without platinum Other Unknown treatment No treatment given Not yet given (no clinical relapse) 78 (29) 40 (15) 91 (34) 15 (6) 28 (11) 2 (1) 11 (4) 67 (25) 33 (13) 101 (38) 9 (3) 8 (3) 24 (9) 7 (3) Total 265 264

15 Time from randomisation to second-line chemotherapy
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Proportion alive not started second-line chemotherapy 264 177 116 91 69 56 49 42 33 Delayed 265 23 16 14 11 10 9 Early Number at risk 3 6 12 15 18 21 24 Months since randomisation Median (months) Early Delayed HR=0.29 (95% CI 0.24, 0.35) p<

16 Outcomes (data frozen 16th February 2009)
Alive Dead Cause of death: Disease related Chemotherapy related Disease & Chemotherapy related Other Missing 150 (28%) 379 (72%) 364 1 2 11 Median follow-up (months) 56.9

17 Months since randomisation
Overall Survival HR=1.00 (95%CI ) p=0.98 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Proportion surviving 264 236 203 167 129 103 69 53 38 31 19 Delayed 265 247 211 165 131 94 72 51 22 Early Number at risk 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 Months since randomisation Abs diff at 2 years= 0.1% (95% CI diff= -6.8, 6.3%) Early Delayed

18 Third-line treatment or death
Early N=265 Delayed N=264 Alive, no third-line treatment Alive, after third-line treatment Died, after third-line treatment Died, no third-line treatment 9% 16% 52% 23% 12% 14% 41% 33% 68% on early arm and 56% on delayed arm received third-line treatment p =

19 Time from randomisation to third-line treatment or death
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Proportion alive not receiving third-line chemotherapy 264 232 173 117 76 48 35 Delayed 265 224 138 70 38 22 17 Early Number at risk 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months since randomisation Median (months) Early Delayed 17.1 HR=0.69 (95% CI 0.58, 0.83) p=0.0001

20 Quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire collected every 3 months from registration and prior to each cycle of chemotherapy until the end of third-line treatment Primary outcome measures: Time until first Global Health related deterioration or death Overall time with ‘good’ Global Health Score (GHS) during first two years after randomisation ‘Good’ GHS score: improved or <10% decrease from pre-randomisation score Global Health deterioration: >10% decrease from pre-randomisation score

21 Proportion alive without Months since randomisation
Time from randomisation to first deterioration in Global Health Score (or death) 1.00 Median (months) Early 3.1 Delayed 5.8 HR=0.71 (95% CI 0.57, 0.87) p=0.001 0.75 Proportion alive without deterioration in GHS 0.50 0.25 0.00 6 12 18 24 Months since randomisation Number at risk Early 190 68 44 23 12 Delayed 194 93 55 38 25

22 Overall time spent with ‘good’ GHS
5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of patients 3 6 9 12 18 21 24 Number of months spent with good GHS score 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of patients 3 6 9 12 18 21 24 Number of months spent with good GHS score Median (months) Early 7.1 Delayed 9.2 p=0.15 (Mann-Whitney test)

23 Conclusions In early treatment arm based on rise in CA125
Second-line chemotherapy started a median of 4.8 months earlier Third-line chemotherapy started a median of 4.6 months earlier This early treatment did not improve overall survival HR=1.00, 95% CI , p=0.98 Absolute difference at 2 years 0.1% (95%CI -6.8, 6.3%) Early chemotherapy does not improve Qol

24 How should this trial influence practice?
Women can be reassured that There is no benefit from early detection of relapse by routine CA125 measurements Even if CA125 rises, chemotherapy can be delayed until signs or symptoms of tumor recurrence Women can be offered choices in follow-up No routine CA125 measurements but rapid access to CA125 testing if symptoms or signs of relapse Regular CA125 measurements

25 Acknowledgements A huge thank you to all women and all OV05 and collaborators who participated in these trials for over a decade OV05 was funded by the MRC 55955 was funded by the EORTC

26 OV05 and 55955 trial teams OV05/55955 Trial Management Group
Gordon Rustin (OV05 Chief Investigator) Maria E.L. van der Burg ( Study Co-ordinator) David Guthrie Alan Lamont Gordon Jayson Max Parmar Ann Marie Swart Corneel Coens MRC CTU Trial Team Wendi Qian Clare Murray Katharine Goodall Emma Hainsworth Andrea Cradduck Ken Law Claire Amos Nick Chadwick Matt Sydes Sarah Kirk Sue Collins Julia Bland EORTC Headquarters Team Maarten De Rouck Livia Giurgea


Download ppt "Early treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer based on CA125 level alone"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google