Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Houston Marine Insurance Seminar 2002

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Houston Marine Insurance Seminar 2002"— Presentation transcript:

1 Houston Marine Insurance Seminar 2002
Bedrock of MEL is OIL POLLUTION Act of 1990. Before going to latest developmetns review bedrock statute.OPA 90

2 Pollution Basics Exposures OPA 90 CERCLA State law
Cargo owner’s contingent exposures Criminal and civil penalties US Pollutiion Law developed over period of time. Prior to OPA 90 Laundry list of statutes

3 OPA 90 Definitions Act of god Gross ton- ITC verses GRT
Owner and operator Means owner and operator Demise charterer Shipyards and boat dealers Tank vessel

4 OPA 90 Amendments Exclusions from definition of tank vessel
Edible oils financial responsibility Offshore facility financial responsibility Interim payments Response vessel financial responsibility Clarification of liability in response

5 Additional OPA 90 Issues Act of war /terrorism
Mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU) Carrying oil from an offshore facility Failure to cooperate

6 Liability limits often greater than federal limits
State Regulation Liability limits often greater than federal limits Financial responsibility requirements Response/contingency planning

7 State Regulation…continued
Alaska California State law broader in scope

8 State Regulation…continued
OPA 90 does not preempt state law in many areas of regulation U.S. v. Locke (INTERTANKO) Supreme Court Decision Federal law controls equipment and operating standards State standards OK for liability and financial responsibility Bottom Line : States continue to pass new requirements for financial responsibility,ballast water, and in other environmental areas. With the ten year old opa in the background, this brings us to the current events

9 Criminal Liability Background
Greater potential that environmental violations will be treated criminally Statutory Basis for Liability OPA 90 Migratory Bird Treaty Act Refuse Act Unseaworthyness

10 Ballast Water…continued
Issue – non-indigenous aquatic species Federal act ineffective States have enacted mandatory ballast water management programs Problematic statutory solutions Greywater regulations in Alaska Moving into another area, ballast wate reguation. Confused atmoshere for vessel owners and operators

11 Incident Response Coverage conflicts among pollution, hull and P & I and underwriters Salvage/wreck removal Firefighting Pollution

12 Ballast Water Should invasive species events be considered “pollution?” Will industry react? Moving into another area, ballast wate reguation. Confused atmoshere for vessel owners and operators

13 Criminal Liability One Example: Eklof Towing (1998) $9.5 million fine
Fine and Probation for company president and tug captain Collateral Consequences Lose Gov’t Contracts Onerous terms of Probation

14 Criminal Liability Other Examples
Canadian Prosecution for Migratory Bird Convention Act (2001) Other U.S. Prosecutions for Deliberate Discharges or falsification of Log Books

15 Criminal Liability Miscellaneous issues No more insurance for fines? Financial guarantee system Effect of criminal investigation on spill response efforts

16 Criminal Liability Solutions Legislative Educate Employees
Identify Criminal Defense Counsel EPA / DOJ want compliance programs Choose Location of a Violation Carefully

17 Defense Fines and Penalties Endorsement
Covers Certain fines under FWPCA, Refuse act and MBTA. Legal Defense Public policy

18 Foreign Asset Control Act
The Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 15 CFR Part 515 issued by the U.S.Government on 8 July 1963 under the Trading With the Enemy Act in response to certain hostile actions by the Cuban government. Administered by the U.S.Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control. Goal of the sanctions is to isolate the Cuban government economically and deprive it of U.S. dollars.

19 Foreign Asset Control Act …Continued
Criminal penalties for violating the sanctions range up to 10 years in prison,$1,000,000 in corporate fines,and $250,000 in individual fines.Civil penalties up to $55,000 per violation may also be imposed. ...No products,technology,or services may be exported from the united states to Cuba, either directly or through third countries,such as Canada or Mexico.…Provision of consulting services is also prohibited.

20 Cargo Owners Alaska California Florida(contingent) Maryland
New Jersey (contingent) North Carolina Oregon Washington

21 Additional Endorsements
Offloading Public vessels Derelict substance Marina coverage Storage ashore

22 Further Information


Download ppt "Houston Marine Insurance Seminar 2002"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google