Download presentation
Published byRobyn Hubbard Modified over 9 years ago
1
Use Irinotecan or a Taxane for 2nd Line GE Cancer Therapy: Don’t Use What Dr. Fuchs Tells You to Use
Jordan D. Berlin, M.D. Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Co-director, GI Oncology Director, Phase I Research Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
2
Disclosures Current Research Support
Advisory Boards here and there in last year Genentech/Roche Karyopharm Amgen Astra Zeneca BMS Lilly/Imclone Symphogen Celgene Vertex Ipsen Current Research Support Amgen, Lilly/Imclone, Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Immunomedics, Otsuka, Merrimack, Oncomed, Genentech/Roche, Taiho
3
So what is the data for second-line chemotherapy?
4
AIO: Small trial of irinotecan vs BSC
Fig. 2 Overall survival (intention to treat population) Median survival Irinotecan: 4.0 months, BSC: 2.4 months; one sided logrank test: p = 0.012; HR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25–0.92). Peter C. Thuss-Patience , Albrecht Kretzschmar , Dmitry Bichev , Tillman Deist , Axel Hinke , Kirstin Breithaupt ,... European Journal of Cancer, Volume 47, Issue 15, 2011,
5
Salvage Chemotherapy for Pretreated Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy Plus Best Supportive Care With Best Supportive Care Alone Jung Hun Kang, Soon Il Lee, Do Hyoung Lim, Keon-Woo Park, Sung Yong Oh, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, In Gyu Hwang, Sang-Cheol Lee, Eunmi Nam, Dong Bok Shin, Jeeyun Lee, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang and Se Hoon Park⇑ JCO Aug 20, 2012:3035
6
Next 2nd line Chemotherapy (SLC) RCT
Screening & consent for RCT Refused RCT, but prefer SLC Willing to participate RCT Refused RCT, but prefer BSC 2:1 randomization SLC SLC BSC BSC Docetaxel or irinotecan RCT N = 202 RCT + PPT RCT: randomized controlled trial PPT: patient-preference trial ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT From Park ASCO 2011
7
Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in randomly assigned patients.
OS 5.3 vs 3.8 months, HR 0.66, p = 0.007 Kang J H et al. JCO 2012;30: ©2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
8
Trial funded by Cancer Research UK grant CRUK/07/013
COUGAR-02: Randomised phase III study of docetaxel versus active symptom control in patients with relapsed esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma N Cook, A Marshall, JM Blazeby, JA Bridgewater, J Wadsley, FY Coxon, W Mansoor, S Madhusudan, S Falk, GW Middleton, D Swinson, I Chau, J Thompson, D Cunningham, P Kareclas, JA Dunn, HER Ford On behalf of COUGAR 02 investigators and NCRI Upper GI Clinical Studies Group Trial funded by Cancer Research UK grant CRUK/07/013 EudraCT Number: ISRCTN
9
Trial Design Stratified by:
Arm A (n=84): Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles + ASC Assess every 3 weeks for 18 weeks, then every 6 weeks Adenocarcinoma of esophagus, esophagus-gastric junction or stomach refractory to platinum and fluoropyrimide RANDOMISE 1:1 n=168 Arm B (n=84): Active symptom control May include: Radiotherapy, analgesia, anti-emetics, steroids Stratified by: 1.Disease status (Locally advanced vs metastatic); 2. Site of disease (Esophagus vs GEJ vs Stomach); 3. Time to progression after previous chemotherapy ( 0 vs 0-3 vs 3-6 months); 4. ECOG PS ( 0/1 vs 2)
10
Overall survival Median survival: 5.2 months (95% CI ) for Docetaxel 3.6 months (95% CI ) for ASC Hazard ratio 0.67 (95% CI ), p=0.01
11
This is a difficult population to treat
Docetaxel BSC Completed 18 weeks 23% 36% Reason off Death 15% 38% PD 40% 2% Tox 31% N/A Treatment 14% These patients are sick Most do not complete treatment plan We still need to learn how best to select patients who will benefit
12
Randomized phase III study of irinotecan (IRI) versus weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to combination chemotherapy (CT) of fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP): WJOG4007 trial Ueda S, Hironaka S, Yasui H, Nishina T, Tsuda M, Tsumura T, Sugimoto N, Shimodaira H, Tokunaga S, Moriwaki T, Esaki T, Nagase M, Fujitani K, Yamaguchi K, Ura T, Hamamoto Y, Morita S, Okamoto I, Boku N, Hyodo I, Gastrointestinal Group of West Japan Oncology Group
13
Institution, PS 0-1/2, target lesion -/+
WJOG4007 Trial – Second line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer AGC refractory to prior FP confirmed by imaging Age 20-75, PS 0-2, No history of CPT-11 or Taxane RANDOMIZATION Stratified by Institution, PS 0-1/2, target lesion -/+ weekly Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 q4w IRI 150 mg/m2 d1, 15 q4w Ueda ASCO 2012
14
Progression Free Survival
IRI wPTX n 111 108 Median 2.3M 3.6M P 0.33 HR (95% CI) 1.14 ( ) 3.6 Probability (%) 2.3 Log-rank test (Months) Number at risk wPTX IRI 108 111 66 46 16 18 9 8 3 6 2 2 1 FAS
15
Overall Survival (Months) IRI wPTX n 111 108 Median 8.4M 9.5M P 0.38
HR (95% CI) 1.13 ( ) Log-rank test Probability (%) (Months) Number at risk wPTX IRI 108 111 80 75 36 29 10 2 3 1 1 Udea ASCO 2012
16
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
wPTX (n=106) IRI (n=110) Total (n=216) Disease Progression 93 ( 88%) 96 ( 87%) 189 Adverse Event 6 ( 6%) 10 ( 9%) 16 Withdraw 5 ( 5%) 2 ( 2%) 7 Death 1 ( 1%) Other PPS
17
Post-Study Chemotherapy (3rd line)
wPTX (n=108) IRI (n=111) P Received 3rd line CT 97 (90%) 80 (72%) 0.001 CPT-11 containing 81 (75%) 5 ( 5%) Taxane containing 8 ( 7%) 67 (60%) Others Fisher’s exact test FAS
18
FROM KANG STUDY SHOWN EARLIER
Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in patients treated with best supportive care (BSC), docetaxel, or irinotecan. Kang J H et al. JCO 2012;30: ©2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
19
Chemotherapy Conclusions
Basically, it works It is not super, but HR of or better fairly consistently Either irinotecan or taxane—both are reasonable Don’t give both at the same time. That’s just mean Probably works best in highly selected patients as in the WJOG study PS 0-1 Doubtful it benefits PS = 2 But it would be nice to have more selection factors
20
Phase 3 Trial of Everolimus in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: GRANITE-1
Eric Van Cutsem*, K. H. Yeh, Y. J. Bang, L. Shen, J. A. Ajani, Y. X. Bai, H. C. Chung, H. M. Pan, K. Chin, K. Muro, Y. H. Kim, H. Smith, C. Constantini, S. Rizvi, T. Sahmoud, A. Ohtsu On behalf of the GRANITE-1 Investigators * University Hospital Leuven/Belgium Presented at the 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.
21
Overall Survival (FAS)
Probability of overall survival (%) 100 80 60 40 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (months) 14 Censoring Times Everolimus + BSC (n/N = 352/439) Placebo + BSC (n/N = 180/217) Everolimus + BSC: 5.39 months Placebo + BSC: 4.34 months Hazard ratio: 0.90 (95% CI, ) Log-rank P value = No. of patients still at risk Everolimus Placebo 16 18 22 24 217 172 1 17 82 35 28 439 355 253 195 139 87 52 30 13 3
22
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (A) and progression-free survival (B)
REGARD TRIAL OS HR = 0.776 The Lancet, Volume 383, Issue 9911, 2014, Charles S Fuchs , Jiri Tomasek , Cho Jae Yong , Filip Dumitru , Rodolfo Passalacqua , Chanchal Goswami , Howard S... Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
23
Let’s Compare: Trials vs BSC
Chemotherapy Targeted Therapy AIO (irinotecan) HR 0.48 Granite-1 (everolimus) HR 0.90 Kang (irinotecan or docetaxel) HR 0.66 REGARD (ramucirumab) HR 0.776 Cougar-02 (docetaxel) HR 0.67 It all comes down to hazard ratio: For chemotherapy, it is very consistent, but for targeted agents, it is consistently not as good
24
So, if I were Dr. Fuchs, I would concede defeat and
“If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”
25
RAINBOW: A Global, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel (PTX) Versus Placebo and PTX in the Treatment of Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma Following Disease Progression on First-Line Platinum- and Fluoropyrimidine-Containing Combination Therapy H. Wilke* Eric Van Cutsem, Sang Cheul Oh, György Bodoky, Yasuhiro Shimada, Shuichi Hironaka, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Oleg Lipatov, Tae You Kim, David Cunningham, Atsushi Ohtsu, Philippe Rougier, Michael Emig, Roberto Carlesi, Kumari Chandrawansa, Kei Muro *On behalf of the RAINBOW Investigators
26
Second line metastatic gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma
26 RAINBOW: Randomized Phase III Trial 2nd Line Paclitaxel +/- Ramucirumab Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 + Ramucirumab IV q 2 weeks Second line metastatic gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma R 1:1 Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 + Placebo q 2 weeks Primary EP: OS N = 665 26
27
RAINBOW: Overall Survival
HR (95% CI) = (0.678, 0.962) Stratified log rank p-value = RAM + PTX PBO + PTX Patients / Events 330 / 256 335 / 260 Median(mos) (95% CI) 9.63 (8.48, 10.81) 7.36 (6.31, 8.38) 6-month OS 72% 57% 12-month OS 40% 30% Δ mOS = 2.3 months Censored No. at risk RAM + PTX 330 308 267 228 185 148 116 78 60 41 24 13 6 1 PBO + PTX 335 294 241 180 143 109 81 64 47 30 22 5 2
28
Overall conclusion Thanks to the organizers for giving me the obviously better choice I can stick with hazard ratio and not even point out the price differentials And also, thank the organizers for not giving Dr. Fuchs the option of combining targeted and chemo And also, thank Drs. Van Cutsem, Bendell, Kang, and Cook for the slides of theirs I used.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.