Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 “New Federal Initiatives on Enforcement” Michael Brustein Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 NACTEI.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 “New Federal Initiatives on Enforcement” Michael Brustein Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 NACTEI."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 “New Federal Initiatives on Enforcement” Michael Brustein Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 Mbrustein@bruman.com NACTEI Pre-Conference May 16, 2006 Palm Springs, CA

2 2 SEAs must use a risk-based plan to assess and monitor all LEAs to ensure that they have systems in place to properly account for, and adequately document and support, claims submitted for reimbursement. -OIG

3 3 SEAs must ensure that monitoring teams include financial personnel to look at financial issues and check for compliance with financial requirements. -OIG

4 4 Significant Cultural Shift at ED to “Internal Controls”

5 5 Definition of “internal Controls” An integral component of organization’s management that provides reasonable assurance of: 1. Effectiveness & Efficiency of operations 2. Reliability of reporting 3. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations -GAO

6 6 States and locals scheduled for monitoring from now on can expect much closer examinations of financial records

7 7 Such financial records must detail: 1. Flow of funds to locals 2. Audit findings and corrective action plans 3. Procurement, distribution, equipment -James Evans OCFO

8 8 OCFO Subject to: 1. Improper Payments Information Act 2. Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act Holds ED managers legally accountably for internal controls of federal programs

9 9 OCFO now assesses the risk that federal funds are being spent erroneously. OCFO ensures effective internal controls are in place and adhered to at the state and local level

10 10 Issues How long did the transfer take from state to local? How does the state document the obligations over the 27 months? Are carryover provisions implemented correctly?

11 11 How well does the state monitor corrective action plans developed in response to audits?

12 12 Equipment 16 of 17 states and districts visited did not maintain accurate equipment inventory

13 13 Equipment OCFO will select a piece of equipment from inventory list and then see if they can find it.

14 14 Procurement 11 of 17 states visited lacked adequate controls over the processing and payment of vendor invoices

15 15 2006 OIG Workplan 1) SEA monitoring of LEAs

16 16 Audits Corrective action plans to address audit findings in the A-133 single audit reports were either unavailable for review, improperly prepared, or prepared in an untimely manner (8) Management and internal control letters addressing A-133 and financial statement audit reports were unavailable for review (2) No documentation provided to indicate that A- 133 audits had been conducted or copies were not available for review (2)

17 17 Procurement & Disbursement Controls Inadequate controls over purchase orders (13) Inadequate controls over processing and payment of vendor invoices (11) Lack of adequate controls over the distribution of Title I finds by SEA and/or LEA (10) Inadequate controls over funds distribution documents (FDDs) and P638 draw down forms (4) Inadequate controls over SEA/LEA contracts issued to vendors (3) Inadequate controls over travel advances and travel payment vouchers (3)

18 18 Inadequate documentation to demonstrate proper application of indirect cost principles (2) Lack of documentation for the approval function in an automated procurement system (2) Lack of supporting documentation for journal entries (2) Lack of documented competitive bidding process (1) Lack of documentation to support use of Title I funds for payroll (1) Inadequate controls over the purchase card process (1) Student lunch applications used for eligibility not complete (1) Procurement & Disbursement Controls cont…

19 19 Equipment Title I equipment inventory not available (16) Lack of adequate controls to account for location and custody of Title I equipment (7) No property tags on equipment (3) The capitalization threshold for Title I equipment exceeds $5,000 (2) Inadequate procedures for recording the transfer of Title I equipment (2) Inadequate controls to ensure that Title I funds are not used to purchase equipment for the exclusive use of other programs (1)

20 20 A-133 Common Audit Findings 1.Cash Management Minimize time elapsing between drawing down federal cash and disbursing it.

21 21 2. Property records 80.32(d)(1) Make sure all required data elements are maintained 1. Description of the property 2. Identification number 3. Source of property 4. Who holds the title 5. Acquisition date 6. Cost 7. Percent of federal participation 8. Location of the property 9. Use & condition of the property 10. Ultimate disposition- Date of disposal Sale price

22 22 3. Equipment Inventory Inventory all equipment purchased with federal funds at least once every two years Control system to safeguard against loss or damage

23 23 4. Noncompetitive Procurement If contracts awarded on a sole source basis, prepare a written justification, e.g. emergency no responses to solicitation

24 24 5. Obtain Prior Written Approval If grant agreement states that an administrative act requires prior approval, make sure you get it in writing from the grantor agency.

25 25 6. Timely Accurate Financial & Performance Reports Late or inaccurate reports are a “red flag” of weakness in the system – often invites greater scrutiny.

26 26 7. Cost Transfers Shifts of costs between programs invites audit scrutiny. -Supplanting -Allocability

27 27 8. Time & Effort Reports This is the most frequently cited violation.

28 28 THE KEY: Aligning Effort and Funding

29 29 Audit inquiries may commence with focus on funding side (federal grants received) or effort side (payroll distribution records or P.D.’s)

30 30 Attendance Records are NOT the Equivalent of Effort Records

31 31 A-87 / A-21 Distribution of salaries must be based on payrolls documented in accord with the generally accepted practices of the agency.

32 32 There is no single best method for documenting the distribution of effort.

33 33 But the method must recognize the principle of “after-the-fact” confirmation, so that charges to a grant reflect actual charges. Budgets do not reflect actual charges.

34 34 Confirmation must be done by employee under A-87 or “responsible person with suitable means of verification” under A-21

35 35 While charges may be made initially on the basis of estimates before the services are performed, changes in the work activity must be entered into the payroll distribution system.

36 36 Where employees are expected to work solely on a single cost objective, salaries must be supported by semi- annual certification signed by employee or supervisor.

37 37 Where employees work on more than one cost objective, use either PARS or substitute systems

38 38 Elements of PARS 1. After the fact distribution of actual activity of each employee 2. Account for total activity for which employee is compensated 3. Prepared at least monthly 4. Signed by the employee

39 39 Questions on Time and Effort Is the distinction between single or multiple cost objectives based on how employees are paid? NO!

40 40 Questions on Time and Effort cont… If employee is paid with nonfederal funds, but effort is counted toward a match, are T/E records required? YES!

41 41 Questions on Time and Effort cont… What if the employee works only a brief time on an activity unrelated to the federal cost objectives?

42 42 If deviations between budget estimates and actual costs are less than 10% are adjustments required?

43 43 Questions on Time and Effort cont… If the employee works on an activity that is allowable under more than one program, must the time be allocated? NO!

44 44 Substitute Systems 1. Lamar Alexander Guidance 1992 2. The Florida, North Carolina, Michigan Models

45 45 Substitute Systems 1. Account for actual effort weekly for three representative months; 2. Actual effort is within 10% of projected effort; 3. Regardless of deviation, adjustments required; 4. Then account for effort weekly for two representative months; 5. Adjustments required.

46 46 Substitute Systems 1. ED approves SEA process 2. SEA approves LEA process 3. LEA may use substitute system even if SEA does not

47 47 Consequences for Legally Deficient System

48 48 Reconstruction of Documents Not a substitute for contemporaneous records But often accepted by OALJ on appeal

49 49 Reconstruction Affidavits of employees with first hand knowledge Work product Calendars Schedules

50 50 Where to Find Federal Education Grants Management Requirements Program Rules: www.ed.govwww.ed.gov Statutes Regulations Guidance General Education Provisions Act (GEPA): http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode2 0/usc_sup_01_20_10_31.html http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode2 0/usc_sup_01_20_10_31.html Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR): http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.h tml http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.h tml

51 51 Where to Find Federal Education Grants Management Requirements Office of Management & Budget Circulars http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/ OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-122 Cost Principles OMB Circular A-133 Single Audit OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement Note – for audits performed after June 30, 2004, must look at 2004 AND 2005 Supplements

52 52 Federal Cost Principles

53 53 Federal Cost Principles A-21 Educational Institutions A-87 State, Local & Indian Tribal Governments A-122 Non-Profit Organizations 48 CFR pt. 31 For-Profit Organizations

54 54 Cost Principles: Basic Guidelines All Costs Must Be: Necessary Reasonable Allocable Legal under state and local law

55 55 Cost Principles: Basic Guidelines In addition, all costs must: Conform with federal law & grant terms Consistently treated In accordance with GAAP Not included as match Net of applicable credits Adequately documented

56 56 Basic Guidelines (cont.) Adequately documented Amount of funds under grant How the funds are used Total cost of the project Share of costs provided by other sources Records that show compliance Records that show performance Other records to facilitate an effective audit

57 57 A-87, Attachment B– Selected Items of Costs 43 specific costs detailed Listed in alphabetical order

58 58 EDGAR Overview Education Department General Administrative Regulations: 34 CFR pts. 74-99 Part 74: Admin. of Grants to Institutions of Higher Ed, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations Part 75: Direct Grant Programs Part 76: State-Administered Programs Part 77: Definitions Part 80: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments

59 59 Financial Management 34 CFR 80.20 & 34 CFR 74.21 Fiscal control and accounting procedures must be sufficient to: Prepare reports Trace funds to a level of expenditure adequate to show funds spent properly

60 60 Matching/Cost Sharing 34 CFR 80.24 & 34 CFR 74.23 Costs must be allowable under the grant Includes: Grantee expenditures (cash contribution) Donations (in-kind contribution) Must be verifiable from records

61 61 Program Income 34 CFR 80.25 & 34 CFR 74.24 Income directly generated by a grant supported activity or earned only as a result of the grant agreement, includes income from: Fees for services performed Use of property acquired under grant Sale of commodities or items fabricated under a grant agreement Payments of principal and interest on loans made with grant funds

62 62 Program Income – cont. Royalties Generally, revenue from: Royalties License fees Patents Is not considered program income unless specifically identified in the grant agreement

63 63 Use of Program Income Deducted from total allowable costs and used for allowable expenses Added to the total grant award and used for allowable expenses Used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements

64 64 Changes to Approved Budget 34 CFR 80.30 & 34 CFR 74.25 Must report deviations from budget and program plans Must request prior approval: Change in scope or objective Change in key personnel Authority to bring in 3 rd party contractor Certain budget transfers

65 65 EDGAR Part 80.36 Procurement Competition 80.36(c). All procurement transactions must be conducted with full and open competition.

66 66 Equipment 34 CFR 80.32 & 34 CFR 74.34 Title vests in the grantee May use for other projects as long as no interference Must ensure adequate maintenance

67 67 Equipment (cont.) Property acquired under the grant must be recorded in an inventory management system Property records (description, serial number or other ID, title info, acquisition date, cost, percent of Federal participation, location, use and condition, and ultimate disposition) Physical inventory (at least every two years) Control system to prevent loss, damage, theft (all must be investigated)

68 68 Disposition When no longer needed: Property may be used for other activities currently or previously supported with federal funds Otherwise, must dispose according to regulations 34 CFR 80.32(e)

69 69 Copyrights 34 CFR 80.34 & 34 CFR 74.36 Grantee may copyright work that was developed for or purchased under federal grant Federal government may reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the copyright in any work developed under the grant Federal government does not need to pay royalties

70 70 Record Retention 34 CFR 80.42 & 34 CFR 74.53 Must retain records that show: Amount of funds under by grant or subgrant How the state or subgrantee uses funds Total cost Share of costs provided from other sources Compliance with program requirements Other records to facilitate and audit Federal: 3 years Statute of limitations: 5 years

71 71 Cash Management Requirements

72 72 Period of Availability 34 CFR 80.23 & 34 CFR 74.28 Tydings Amendment Does not apply to all grants Funds are available to state for 27 months: 15 months under the grant award (July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2006) Plus 12 months (October 1, 2006 – September 30, 2007) State may limit period of availability! Check award notice

73 73 Definition of Obligation Under Federal Law Acquisition of PropertyDate of binding written commitment Personal Services by Employee When services are performed Personal Services by Contractor Date of binding written commitment TravelWhen travel is taken

74 74 Liquidations Federal regulations: Must liquidate all obligations within 90 days after the end of the period of availability Example: Period of availability: July 1 – September 30 Liquidation period ends: December 30 ED may extend this deadline State may limit the period! Check award notice

75 75 “Lapsing” of Perkins Funds Sclafani September 2, 2005 memo

76 76 Supplement, Not Supplant

77 77 Supplement Not Supplant Cannot use federal funds to pay for services, staff, programs, or materials that would otherwise be paid with state or local funds Always ask: “What would have happened in the absence of federal funds?”

78 78 Supplement Not Supplant (cont.) A-133 Compliance Supplement presumes supplanting in 3 situations: 1. Used federal funds to provide services the SEA or LEA is required to make available under other federal, state or local laws 2. Used federal funds to provide services the SEA or LEA provided with state or local funds in the prior year

79 79 Supplement Not Supplant (cont.) Presumption may be rebutted: If SEA or LEA demonstrates it would not have provided the services with state or local funds if the federal funds were not available

80 80 Questions???

81 81 This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.


Download ppt "1 “New Federal Initiatives on Enforcement” Michael Brustein Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 NACTEI."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google