1. Meeting of the National Technology Platform of the Italian Food Industry Rome, July 5 th 2006

2. European Technology Platform Concept Each ETP is a transparent industry-led public-private partnership to strengthen the European-wide innovation process by uniting stakeholders around a common programme of activities. Each ETP will possess a common VISION a defined STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA an IMPLEMENTATION PLAN describing how the programme of activities will be managed and funded.

3. Other relevant ETPs Knowledge-based Bio-economies Plants for the Future Animal Breeding Global Animal Health Sustainable Chemistry [Industrial Biotechnology] Forest-based Sector NanoMedicine-Nanotechnologies for Medical Applications Water Supply and Sanitation http://cordis.europa.eu.int/technology-platforms European Action Plan on Diet, Physical Activity and Health

4. ETP Food for Life Vision An effective integration of strategically-focussed, trans-national, concerted research in the nutritional-, food- and consumer sciences and food chain management will deliver innovative, novel and improved food products for, and to, national, regional and global markets in line with consumer needs and expectations. These products, together with recommended changes in dietary regimes and lifestyles, will have a positive impact on public health and overall quality of life (‘adding life to years’). Such targeted activities will support a successful and competitive pan- European agro-food industry having global business leadership securely based on economic growth, technology transfer, sustainable food production and consumer confidence. http://etp.ciaa.be

5. European Agro-Food Industry Largest manufacturing sector in EU (13.6 % in EU15), Turnover EU25 was € 840 billion in 2005, Total exports € 45 billion in 2005 with a positive trade balance of € 5.8 billion, Major employer - 4.1 million workers over 60% in the SME sector [rising to over 90% within food and drink sector], X Limited growth of 1.9%, X Global competitors increasing in number and investing more than Europe.

6. European Agro-Food Industry  Food and drink investment in 2003 was 0.32%, lagging behind Japan, US and Australia, and below the European manufacturing average.  European growth in production value over the last decade was similar to that of US, but lower than many competitors, especially Brazil.  Europe performs slightly better in value-addition that US but worse than Australia, Canada and Brazil.  Since 2002, Europe’s labour productivity has decreased relative to the US and between 2000-2004 increased by 16% whereas the figure for Brazil was 27%. Benchmarking Report on Food and Drink Industry Competitiveness, CIAA, 2006

7. Be healthy for longer

8. Give children a good start

9. Food you can trust

10. Sustainable production

11. European Technology Platform Food for Life - Food Quality and Manu- facturing Food and Health Food Safety Sustainable Food Production Food and Consumer Communication, Training, Technology Transfer Food Chain Management

12. ETP Food for Life Organisation Food and Health Platform Secretariat Horizontal Activities Group Member States’ Mirror Group Operational Committee Board Food Quality and Manu- facture Food Chain Manage ment Sust’ble Food Prodn Food Safety Food and Consumer Communication, Training & Technology Transfer

13. Key challenges of the SSRA  Ensuring that the healthy choice is the easy choice for consumers,  Delivering a healthy diet,  Developing value-added food products with superior quality, convenience, availability and affordability,  Assuring safe foods that consumers can trust,  Achieving sustainable food production,  Managing the food chain,  Communication, training and technology transfer. Full details of priorities, deliverables and milestones will be found at http://etp.ciaa.behttp://etp.ciaa.be

14. Communication, Training and Technology Transfer

15. SSRA: towards ETP implementation  Increasing the financial resources committed to innovation in the European food industry – national and regional funding, industry support, structural funds, EIB, banks and venture capital  Improving education, skills and facilities in Europe – targeted and life long learning  Optimising stakeholder understanding and commitment – industry, SMEs, research [natural sciences, technologies, humanities] consumers, regulators, policy makers, NGOs, science writers, trade journalists etc.  Initiating scenario studies  Effective cooperation with all relevant national and regional activities, networks and projects.

16. Recent activities and forward planning Recent activities:  ETP Food for Life launched July 2005; Vision document published  Board, Operational Committee and Working Groups established  Two step-Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) process defined and agreed  SSRA submitted to European Commission April 2006 so as to provide one of the expert inputs into FP7 Forward planning:  Web-, regional- and national stakeholder consultations, April- December 2006  Formation of Mirror Group June-October 2006  SRA to be published March 2007  Implementation Plan to be published March 2007  Discussion on public-private funding to December 2007

17. Yes! the ETP Food for Life will  drive European competitiveness based on the size and national importance of the F&D sector and the transition foreseen to high value-added product portfolio having a major impact on well-being and welfare  impact positively on Community policies (research integration, increased R&D expenditure, greater involvement of SMEs)  boost research performance to effect the transition to high value-added products  sustain career development in food R&D in Europe and promote entrepreneurial activity  prevent fragmentation by creating a shared Common Vision and managing an effective Implementation Plan for the SRA. An effective public-private partnership will be essential to fulfil the Vision

18. ETP Food for Life http://etp.ciaa.be http://etp.ciaa.be This is a European Technology Platform which must be flexible enough to address the needs and opportunities of all regions of Europe. To maximise its impact it needs the support and commitment of all stakeholders in all regions of Europe. The ETP needs the expert input of stakeholders in Italy so that its regions, its industries, its researchers and its citizens can gain the maximum benefit from its activities.

19. ETP Food for Life http://etp.ciaa.be http://etp.ciaa.be The ETP needs the expert input of stakeholders in Italy so that your regions, your industries, your researchers and your citizens can gain the maximum benefit from its activities Thank you for your attention. ETP necessita dell’esperto contributo delle parti interessate in Italia cosi che le vostre regioni, i vostri ricercatori, le vostre industrie ed i vostri cittadini possano trarre il massimo beneficio dalla sua attivita’ Grazie per la vostra attenzione.