Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN"— Presentation transcript:

1 SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN
-A CASE STUDY IN HITACHI GROUP- SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES DEVELOPMENT PLAN AUDIT SOFTWARE INSPECTION DOCUMENT INSPECTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE TESTING STAGE TESTING STRATEGIES QUALITY TARGET MANAGEMENT QUALITY PROBE (QP) PRODUCT INSPECTION DISTRIBUTION OF SOFTWARE FAULTS SYSTEM TEST SYSTEM SIMULATION TEST Hitachi Systems & Services,Ltd. Quality Assurance Department Takamasa Nara

2 SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
POINTS TO CONSIDER AGGREGATE OF ALL LOGIC DIFFICULTY IN ACCURATE      DESIGN OF LOGIC DIFFICULTY IN RELIABLE        TESTING OF LOGIC INVISIBILITY INVISIBILITY OF SOFTWARE INVISIBILITY OF THE           DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STRUCTURED DESIGN METHOD   AND DESIGN REVIEW SYSTEMATIC TESTING METHOD DESIGN AND NOTATION         METHODS VISUALIZATION OF QUALITY     AND PROGRESS STATUS

3 SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTICS POINTS TO CONSIDER
MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE USER  ●DIFFICULTY IN       UNDERSTANDING THE    NEEDS OF THE USER  ●DIFFICULTY IN UNDERSTNDING THE CONDITIONS FOR USE GREAT DEPENDENCE ON INDIVIDUALS  ●REDUCTION IN DEPENDENCE    ON INDIVIDUALS  ●EDUCATING INDIVIDUALS  ●REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS,    DEFINITION TECHNIQUE  ●TESTING UNDER USER CONDITIONS  ●STANDARDIZATION AND AUTOMATION OF DEVELOPMENT METHODS  ●RE-USE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER  ●EDUCATION, TRAINING

4 SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AUDIT
●PROJECT PLAN ―INSUFFICIENT STAFF AND ORGANIZATION ―UNDERESTIMATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT TIME AND MANPOWER ●QUALITY PLAN ―DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND QUALITY TARGET VALUES ―METHODS AND PROCEDURES TO REALIZE QUALITY TARGET VALUES AT EACH PHASE

6 SOFTWARE INSPECTION ITEM EXPLANATION INSPECTION ORGANIZATION SCOPE
THE INSPECTION ORGANIZATION MUST BE INDEPENDENT OF THE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING DEPARTMENTS IN ORDER TO MAKE FAIR JUDGEMENTS ●INSPECTION MUST BE FROM THE CUSTOMER’S    VIEWPOINT: ―PRODUCTS WHOSE QUALITY DOES NOT MEET     THE PREDETERMINED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA    ARE REJECTED ●INSPECTION INVOLVES ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE   QUALITY FOR THE CUSTOMER AFTER DELIVERY SCOPE ●IN HOUSE  -INSPECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PROCESSES  -QUALITY CONTROL FOR ALL PROCESSES FROM    BASIC DESIGN TO FINAL INSPECTION ●OUTSIDE  -QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITES  -LIAISON FOR CUSTOMER NEEDS AND           COMPLAINTS

7 DOCUMENT INSPECTION 1.INTERNAL DOCUMENT INSPECTION 1.1 DOCUMENT
  ●FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS    ●DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ETC. 1.2 AIMS ●ANTICIPATIVE QUALITY CONTROL OF PROGRAMS ●QUALITY CONTROL AT DESIGN PROCESSES (EVALUATION OF DOCUMENTS) ●PROGRESS CONTROL AT DESIGN PROCESSES 2. EXTERNAL DOCUMENT INSPECTION 2.1 DOCUMENT ●MANUALS ETC. 2.2 AIMS ●ASSURING SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY   ●CONSISTENCY WITH THE INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION ●EVALUATING UNDERSTANDABILITY AND USABILITY

8 QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE TESTING STAGE
●TESTING STRATEGIES ●FORECASTING DEFECTS AND MANAGEMENT OF TARGET VALUES

9 TESTING STRATEGIES 1.SETTING TARGET NUMBER OF ERRORS FOR EACH TEST PROCESS 2.IMPORTANCE OF CODE REVIEW 3.SYSTEMATIC TESTS ●USE EXTERNAL SPECIFICATION AND INTERNAL           SPECIFICATION TESTS ●TECHNIQUE FOR SETTING TEST ITEMS MUST BE BASED ON   CLEAR AND APPROPRIATE TEST CRITERIA ●USE TEST COVERAGE MEASURES AND TECHNIQUES 4.REUSING TESTING TECHNIQUES AND REDUCING TEST LABOR REQUIREMENTS 5.SYSTEM TESTING

10 QUALITY TARGET MANAGEMENT
2.DRAWING MANAGEMENT CURVE 1.SET QUALITY TARGET 6.TARGET REVIEW 3. MONITOR 5. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 4. QUALITY ESTIMATION ●FORECASTING ERRORS BY GROWTH CURVE (FRCST) ●QUALITY PROBE〔QP〕

11 QUALITY PROBE〔QP〕 PURPOSE:
MEASURE AND ESTIMATE SOFTWARE QUALITY DURING TEST STAGE BY QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT METHOD: ●SAMPLING TEST 〔10%~20% OF TEST ITEMS〕 ●OPERATIONAL USE BY INSPECTORS ●ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATION OF THE RESULT -HIDDEN BUGS ESTIMATE 〔QUANTITATIVE〕    -IDENTIFYING WEAK POINTS OF DESIGN 〔QUALITATIVE〕

12 PRODUCT INSPECTION PURPOSE: JUDGING WHETHER THE SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ARE
ACCEPTABLE METHOD: ●JUDGEMENT IS MADE FROM THE CUSTOMER’S POINT OF   VIEW ●PRODUCT INSPECTION USES A COMPUTER TO RUN THE    SOFTWARE PRODUCTS ●IF IT FAILS, THE DESIGN DEPARTMENT IMPROVES        QUALITY AGAIN, AND INSPECTION IS REPEATED

13 Distribution of Software Faults
21.9 53.8 (QA Dpt.)

14 SYSTEM TEST AIMS: ●TEST AS A TOTAL SYSTEM
-RUN TEST IN ACTUAL OR SIMULATED USER ENVIRONMENTS -ABNORMAL TEST WITH ERRORS, ABNORMAL OPERATIONS AND OVERLOAD DATA EXPECTED TO OCCUR IN THE ACTUAL ENVIRONMENT -PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TEST FACILITIES OF HITACHI’S SYSTEM TEST CENTER:(REFERED TO AS SST) ●HARDWARE EQUIPMENT INCLUDING 17 LARGE SCALE COMPUTERS ●NETWORK EQUIPMENT ●SIMULATORS(INCLUDING MULTIPLE TERMINAL SIMULATORS, AND HARDWARE ERROR SIMULATORS ●SUPPORT TOOLS

15 SYSTEM SIMULATION TEST


Download ppt "SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICE IN JAPAN"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google