Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Investigation of detectors for border traffic counts 5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Transportation Conference Project sponsor—Center for International.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Investigation of detectors for border traffic counts 5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Transportation Conference Project sponsor—Center for International."— Presentation transcript:

1 Investigation of detectors for border traffic counts 5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Transportation Conference Project sponsor—Center for International Intelligent Transportation Research Dan Middleton, Ph.D., P.E.

2 Outline Justification Background Study Methodology Detector selection Results Conclusions

3 Justification Existing Sources of Vehicle Count Data – CBP – TxDOT – Ports of Entry Why these sources are not sufficient – Permission not always granted – Granularity not sufficient – No control over quality of data

4 Background Tests conducted earlier – TAMU Riverside campus – Local streets in College Station – Bridge of the Americas – Ysleta/Zaragoza

5 Study Methodology Task 1. Investigate latest detectors Task 2. Conduct initial field tests Task 3. Conduct final field tests Task 4. Produce deliverables

6 Detector Selection Other technologies that were unsuitable – Laser scanners – Sidefire microwave detectors – Tracking video detectors – Wireless magnetometers Detectors selected – LED scanner – Wireless magnetometers – Wireless micro-radar

7 LED Scanner Easy to integrate 16 independent segments (zones) 45-degree beam 0 to 50 meter range Rapid data acquisition rate (50 Hz) Weather resistant enclosure

8 Wireless Magnetometers Range up to 6 ft Moderate to high speed Drill 4-inch diameter hole Communicates with roadside Designed for larger vehicles Battery life about 10 years Omni-directional

9 Wireless Micro-Radar Range up to 6 ft Slow speed only (<40 mph) Drill 4-inch diameter hole Communicates with roadside Designed for bicycles/pedestrians Battery life about 8 years Differentiates between bicycles and cars

10 Leddar IS16 Sensor Lanes 5 and 6 SN Micro-Radar Lanes 2 and 3 SN Micro-Radar Lane 2 Leddar IS16 Sensor YSLETA Car Entrance

11 Ysleta TRUCK SITE Leddar IS16 Sensor SN Micro-Radar

12 Leddar Results—Stop/Go, Riverside Vehicle TypePU1PU2/TrlrSedanPU3MC SUMS3978394035 Correct39 % Correct Detections100.0%0.0%100.0%97.4%89.7% Overall % Correct Detections77.4%

13 SN Magnetometer Results – Constant Speed, Riverside Interval Start Ground Truth Magnetometers NB1S2NBS1NB1S3 13:2261081 13:234988 13:24712 13:259151316 13:2671514 13:2781413 13:288131415 13:2981213 13:30914 13:317131517 13:328121314 13:338141516 13:346887 13:35815 13:368121315 13:378161517 SUMS119204203207 % Error41.7%41.2%43.1%

14 SN Magnetometer Results – Stop/Go, Riverside Interval Start Ground Truth Magnetometers NB1S2NBS1NB1S3 13:423221 13:4347910 13:445887 13:454787 13:4658109 13:475810 13:4859109 13:494788 13:5058108 13:51510911 13:525998 13:535910 13:544777 13:5559109 13:564557 13:5758910 SUMS73121134131 % Error65.8%83.6%79.5%

15 SN Micro-Radar at Constant Speed, Ysleta Truck Site Time PeriodGT VideoSN #1% Diff.SN #2% Diff. 14:30–14:452726−3.7%26−3.7% 14:45–15:00195−73.7%5 15:00–15:153837−2.6%37−2.6% 15:15–15:303231−3.1%320.0% 15:30–15:4535362.9%362.9% 15:45–16:003330−9.1%30−9.1% 16:00–16:15192110.5%2110.5% 16:15–16:302221−4.5%220.0% 16:30–16:452322−4.3%244.3% 16:45–17:002421−12.5%23−4.2% 17:00–17:15770.0%7 SUMS322297307 % Error:−7.8% Error−4.7%

16 SN Micro-Radar Stop/Go, Ysleta Car Entrance Time PeriodGT VideoLane 2% Diff.GT VideoLane 3% Diff. 14:45–15:00 27 0.0% 15:00–15:15 19205.3% 15:15–15:30 1514–6.7% 15:30–15:45 3735–5.4% 15:45–16:00 25264.0% 16:00–16:15 3837–2.6% 16:15–16:303631−13.9%4341−4.7% 16:30–16:453429−14.7%4341−4.7% 16:45–17:002925−13.8%37 0.0% 17:00–17:153934−12.8%5144−13.7% 17:15–17:303934−12.8%5752−8.8% SUMS177153231215 % Error−13.6% Error−4.6%

17 Summary of Recent Ysleta Tests Date/LocationDetectorVehicle TypePrimary Motion% Error June 16 Pole Mast Arm Leddar Non-TrucksConstant Speed Faulty Video Micro-RadarNot Tested June 17 Car Tollbooth Leddar Non-TrucksStop-and-Go 0.0% Micro-RadarNot Tested June 18 DPS Truck Site Leddar TrucksConstant Speed 0.0% Micro-Radar−3.6% and −0.3% a June 19 Car Tollbooth Leddar Non-TrucksStop-and-Go Not Tested Micro-Radar−13.6% and −4.6%

18 RECOMMENDATIONS Leddar IS16 exhibited best performance Minor software enhancements needed Micro-radar appropriate where overhead mounts not practical Longer term tests – Test both detectors 3-4 mo – Select variety of environments—both trucks and non-trucks

19 Dan Middleton, Ph.D., P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2929 Research Parkway College Station, TX 77843-3135 Phone: (979) 845-7196 Fax: (979) 845-9873 Email: d-middleton@tamu.edu

20


Download ppt "Investigation of detectors for border traffic counts 5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Transportation Conference Project sponsor—Center for International."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google