1. Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport Burlingame, CA San Francisco, CA October 18-21, 2005 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations John Allspaw, Flickr Plumbr Flickr (Yahoo) jallspaw@yahoo.com October 18, 2005

2. Oct. 18, 2005# 2 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Hardware requirements for LAMP installs have to do with: o A decent amount about the actual hardware (“in-box” stuff) o A bit more about the hardware architecture o Which should complement the application architecture

3. Oct. 18, 2005# 3 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations What we’ll talk about here: o Database (MySQL) layouts and considerations o Some miscellaneous/esoteric stuff (lessons learned) o Caching content and considerations

4. Oct. 18, 2005# 4 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Growing Up, “One Box” solution  Basic web application (discussion board, etc.)  Low traffic  Apache/PHP/MySQL on one machine  Bottlenecks will start showing up: Most likely database before apache/php Disk I/O (Innodb) or locking wait states (MyISAM) Context switching between memory work (apache) and CPU work (MySQL)

5. Oct. 18, 2005# 5 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations ONE BOX

6. Oct. 18, 2005# 6 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Growing Up, “Two Box” solution  Higher traffic application (more demand)  Apache/PHP on box A, MySQL on box B  Same network = bad (*or is it ?), separate network = good  Bottlenecks with start to be: Disk I/O on MySQL machine (Innodb) Locking on MyISAM tables Network I/O

7. Oct. 18, 2005# 7 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations TWO BOX

8. Oct. 18, 2005# 8 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Growing Up, “Many Boxes with Replication” solution Yet even higher traffic Writes are separated from reads (master gets IN/UP/DEL, slaves get SELECTs) Diminishes network bottlenecks, disk I/O, and other “in-box” issues SELECTs, IN/UP/DEL can be specified within the application, OR…. Load-balancing can be used

9. Oct. 18, 2005# 9 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations MANY BOX

10. Oct. 18, 2005# 10 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Slave Lag When slaves can’t keep up with replication They’re too busy: Reading (production traffic) Writing (replication) Manifests as: Comments/photos/any user-entered data doesn’t show up on the site right away So users will repeat the action, thinking that it didn’t “take” the first time, makes situation worse

11. Oct. 18, 2005# 11 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Insert funny photo here about slave lag* *slave lag isn ’ t funny

12. Oct. 18, 2005# 12 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Hardware Load Balancing MySQL

13. Oct. 18, 2005# 13 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations How It’s Usually Done Standard MySQL master/slave replication All writes (inserts/updates/deletes) from application go to Master All reads (selects) from application go to a load- balanced VIP (virtual IP) spreading out load across all slaves

14. Oct. 18, 2005# 14 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations

15. Oct. 18, 2005# 15 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations What Is Good About Load Balancing you can add/remove slaves without affecting application, since queries are atomic (sorta/kinda) additional monitoring point and some automatic failure handling you can treat all of your slave pool as one resource, and makes capacity planning a lot easier if you know the ceiling of each slave

16. Oct. 18, 2005# 16 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations How do you know the ceiling (maximum QPS capacity) of each slave ? First make a guess based on benchmarking (or look up some bench results from Tom’s Hardware or anandtech.com, etc. Then get more machines than that :) Scary: in production during a lull in traffic, remove machines from the pool until you detect lag The QPS you saw right before slave lag set in: THAT is your ceiling

17. Oct. 18, 2005# 17 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations

18. Oct. 18, 2005# 18 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations What Can Be Bad/Tough About Load Balancing: not all load-balancers are created equal, not all load- balancing companies expect this product use, so support may still be thin not that many people are doing it in high-volume situations yet, so support from community isn’t large either Gotchas: port exhaustion, health checks, and balance algorithms

19. Oct. 18, 2005# 19 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Port Exhaustion PROBLEM: LB is basically a traffic cop, nothing more Side effect of having a lot of connections: only ~64,511 ports per each IP (VIP) to use 64,511 ports/120 sec per port…. ~535 max concurrent connections per IP* * Not really, but close to it: tcp_tw_recycle and tcp_tw_reuse

20. Oct. 18, 2005# 20 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations

21. Oct. 18, 2005# 21 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Port Exhaustion (cont’d) SOLUTION: Use a pool of IPs on the database slave/farm side (Netscaler calls these “subnet IPs”, Alteon calls them “PiPs”) Monitor port/connection usage, know when it’s time to add more

22. Oct. 18, 2005# 22 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Health checks LB won’t know anything about how well each MySQL slave is doing, and will pass traffic as long as port 3306 is answering Load balancers don’t talk SQL, only things like plain old TCP, HTTP/S, maybe FTP

23. Oct. 18, 2005# 23 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Health checks (cont’d) Two options: 1.Dirty, but workable:  Have each server monitor itself, and shut off/firewall its own port 3306, even if MySQL is still running

24. Oct. 18, 2005# 24 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Health checks (cont’d) 2. Cleaner, but a bit more work: Have each server monitor itself, and run a check via xinetd (for example, a nagios monitor)  So the LB can tickle that port, and expect back an “OK” string. If not, it’ll automatically take that server out of the pool  Good for detecting and counteracting isolated incidents of ‘slave lag’ and automatically handling it

25. Oct. 18, 2005# 25 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Health Checks

26. Oct. 18, 2005# 26 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Balancing Algorithms Load balancers know HTTP, FTP, basic TCP, but not SQL Two things to care about: Should the server still be in the pool ? (health checks) How should load get balanced ?  “least connections” or “least bandwidth” or “least anything” = BAD  Because not all SQL queries are created equal  Use “round-robin” or “random”  What happens if you don’t: Evil Favoritism™

27. Oct. 18, 2005# 27 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Evil Favoritism

28. Oct. 18, 2005# 28 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations

29. Oct. 18, 2005# 29 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Meanwhile….for “in-the-box considerations”  Interleaving memory *does* make a difference  Always RAID10 (or RAID0 if you’re crazy*) but NEVER RAID5 (for Innodb, anyway)  RAID10 has much more read capacity, and a write penalty, but not as much as RAID5  Always have battery backup for HW RAID write caching  Or, don’t use write caching at all

30. Oct. 18, 2005# 30 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations “IN-THE-BOX” considerations (cont’d)  Always have proper monitoring (nagios, etc.) for failed/rebuilding drives  SATA or SCSI ? SCSI ! It’s worth it!  10k or 15k RPM SCSI ? 15k! It’s worth it! (~20% performance increase when you’re disk bound)  For 64bit Linux (AMD64 or EM64T): Crank up the RAM for Innodb’s buffer pool Swapping = very very bad either: Turn it off (slightly scary) Leave it on and set /proc/sys/vm/swapiness = 0

31. Oct. 18, 2005# 31 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations 10k versus 15k drives ? Does it really matter that much ? Some in-the-wild proof….

32. Oct. 18, 2005# 32 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations 10K drives 15K drives Slave Lag in production

33. Oct. 18, 2005# 33 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Using MySQL with a SAN (Storage Area Network) Do layout storage same as if they would be local Do make sure that the HBA (fiber card) driver is well supported by Linux Don’t share volumes across databases Don’t forget to correctly tune Queue Depth Size, which should be increasing, from server HBA -> switch -> storage

34. Oct. 18, 2005# 34 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Caching your static content

35. Oct. 18, 2005# 35 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Caching Static Content  SQUID = good  Relieve your front-end PHP machines from looking up data that will never (or rarely) change  Generate static pages, and cache them in squid, along with your images

36. Oct. 18, 2005# 36 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Caching Static Content (cont’d)  Use SQUID to accelerate plain-old origin webservers, also known as “reverse-proxy” HTTP acceleration  Described here and elsewhere:  http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-20.html

37. Oct. 18, 2005# 37 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Basic SQUID layout squid accepts requests on 80 passes on cache misses to apache on 81 apache uses as its docroot an NFS mounted dir should be on local subnet, or dedicated net

38. Oct. 18, 2005# 38 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Good HW layout for high-volume SQUIDing  Do use SCSI, and many spindles for disk cache dirs  Don’t use RAID  Do use network attached storage, or place the origin servers on separate machines  Do use ext3 with noatime for disk cache dirs  Do monitor squid stats

39. Oct. 18, 2005# 39 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Flickr: How We Roll

40. Oct. 18, 2005# 40 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations Yummy SQUID stats: >2800 images/sec, ~75-80% are cache hits ~10 million photos cached at any time 1.5 million cached in memory

41. Oct. 18, 2005# 41 Hardware Layouts for LAMP Installations The End