1. FP6-511513 OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems www.ontogrid.net WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions Review Meeting Deft, 11-13 April 2005 Manuel Sánchez Gestido (DEIMOS)

2. 2Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

3. 3Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  General Objectives  Satellite Mission quality analysis of data (QUARC)  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

4. 4Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Introduction  General objectives:  Main objective is to use the development of a semantic Grid-based application with distributed access to heterogeneous resources in real system (Satellite Mission environment).  Utilization of processes that behave as agents allows to automate most of the tasks involved in the management of the information that is saved in and retrieved from a database.

5. 5Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Introduction  Satellite Mission quality analysis of data (QUARC):

6. 6Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Phase goals  Phase achievements  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

7. 7Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Current Status  Phase Goals:  Follow-up of the definition of the general architecture to be considered (T8.1 ” Software study of the deliverables provided in WP1-WP7”).  Enumeration of the particular needs for a Satellite Mission use case (T8.2 ” Business case and user requirements analysis for resource distributed access”).

8. 8Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Current Status  Phase achievements:  Analysis and Test set Definition Deliverable D8.1: “OntoGrid Business Case and User Requirements for Quality Analysis Plattform” (Report)  Precise definition of the use cases in the Data product handling of a Satellite mission (I and II).  Definition of the general design.  Initial version of the application architecture.

9. 9Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

10. 10Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Cross Work Package Relationship Cross Work Package relationship with WP8 WP8 (Satellite Missions use case) WP3 WP4 MultiAgent systems for automation of processes Application in a particular environment WP1 WP5 Example of a real world case (for conceptualization) WP2 WP6WP7 Semantic Grid structure Ontologies in a Grid environment Annotation services Intelligent debugging tools Methodology

11. 11Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Cross Work Package Relationship Software study of the deliverables produced in WP1-WP7 (with updates if any) Business case and user requirements analysis 061218 2430 Tasks and deliverables Develop domain ontologies and formalize knowledge Develop Application architecture Integration Documentation Software development (SW life-cycle)

12. 12Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

13. 13Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects  Ontogrid Functionality applied to Satellite Mission case:  Adapted to a subset of QUARC (Quality analysis of data)  Focuses in: Input in Data Model (events, processes, annotations) Output through:  Objects (Timelines, filters)  Sentences: management timelines and filters Presentation:  Gantt, Plot XY or tables

14. 14Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects  Design Drivers:  Application is conceived to provide a prototype which is able to be adapted to the evolving needs of the Quality Analysis and Calibration activities without system-reengineering.  Allows ingestion and reporting plug-ins at the corresponding interfaces for monitoring new gauges.  Core system, that is mission independent, can be re-used for different Earth Observation Missions (very similar needs and requirements).  Ontogrid will be developed using standards tools for development and implementation

15. 15Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects  Business Processes: All business processes are in charge of monitor and control of a satellite or a set of satellites for getting valuable data (products) from the instruments. These data justifies the mission of the satellite.  Conceptual definitions: Satellite is a hardware and software equipment with a concrete mission. Instrument is a hardware and software component, which allows making measures of specific type. Mission is the objective of any element, in this case of the satellite (i.e. Envisat data supports earth science research and allows monitoring of the evolution of environmental and climatic changes. Products or product files are files generated by an instrument directly (level 0) or processed (level 1b/level2) after being generated by an instrument.

16. 16Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects

17. 17Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects PDS Architectural elements Payload data handling stations for off-line users

18. 18Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Data downlink General navigation process: Verify and control the navigation of the satellite. Inputs: Configuration data Outputs: Products files and auxiliary files Actors: ·  MCS  PDS·  Satellite

19. 19Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Data downlink General navigation process:

20. 20Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Quality process: Monitorization and control of the instruments included in the satellite and all the parameters involved in the data acquisition. Inputs: Products files and auxiliary files Outputs: Reports for “Research and developers”. Actors:  PDS  Research and Development  DEIMOS  ESA Maintenance

21. 21Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Quality process:

22. 22Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Development process: Creation of a customized solution for providing new specific reports from the data extracted from the satellites.  Inputs: Description of the report content  Outputs: DIM, DPM and new configuration  Actors:  DEIMOS  ESA Development  ESA Maintenance  Research and Development

23. 23Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Technical aspects Quality Platform:  QUARC in grid  Use Cases  Generate and distribute report (DPM/DIM)  Add subscription to a report  Monitor System  Configure Use Case  Control System  Actors:  PDS  ESA Maintenance Administrator Configurer  Research and Development Monitor system Configure Use Case Administrator Control system Configurer Client Report could be one of these two actors: ESA Maintenance could be one of these two actors: Researcher and Developer Add subscription to a report PDS Generate and Distribute reports

24. 24Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

25. 25Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Dissemination  Contact with potential users: The person responsible for the QUARC project (Quality Analysis application for Satellite data) in the European Space Agency (ESA-ESRIN) has been informed about the development of the use case for Satellite Missions. Other ESA groups could be interested in the project.  Dissemination of the project: OntoGrid information is present at the Deimos company website (http://www.deimos-space.com/Eng/ref_gss.html) with an additional link to the OntoGrid portal for further details.http://www.deimos-space.com/Eng/ref_gss.html

26. 26Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

27. 27Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable

28. 28Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Table of Contents  Introduction  Current Status  Cross Work Package Relationship  Technical aspects  Dissemination  Spent Effort per Task and Deliverable  Conclusions

29. 29Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Conclusions  Contact with potential users has shown that:  General acceptance for use of new Information Technologies in a bussines environment should come from actual and inmediate benefits (i.e. time/money saving).  Hard-to-understand technology concepts should be kept away from the user. Difficult concepts better to stay within the system.  Potential users feel reluctant to new terminology, specially when they have some equivalence with their particular (technical) vocabulary. Use of this vocabulary, finding connections with new OntoGrid concepts, enhances enormously their interest.  Very difficult to change working habits in a specific professional community (interfaces, etc.). Those parts probably not to be changed drastically.

30. 30Review Meeting - Delft, 11-13 April 2005 Conclusions  Open points:  In order to progress in the development of the application to the Satellite Mission use case it is necessary to define clearly the scope of those specific activities required to be implemented in this particular frame, alongside with the activities covered in the general scheme.  Detailed architecture applicable to the use cases should be frozen at least 4 months before software delivery.