Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mr. Patrick Chong Consultant Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mr. Patrick Chong Consultant Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon"— Presentation transcript:

1 STROKE AND TIA - OPTIMAL SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID DISEASE
Mr. Patrick Chong Consultant Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon Surrey Heart, Stroke and Vascular Centre Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Guildford November 2014

2 Stroke – the figures 3rd leading cause of death and
new strokes annually new strokes annually 3 times as many women die from stroke as from breast cancer.

3 Stroke – the costs $51 billion - Stroke related treatment costs and disability payments in 2003 £7 billion – Stroke related treatment costs and disability payments in 2005 Treatment and research under funded in the UK? £2 million per annum in the UK c.f. Cancer £120 million and Heart Disease £43 million Rothwell 2001 Lancet

4 The dangers of stroke 1 in 4 men before 85 years old
1 in 5 women before 85 years old 30% of stroke patients die within 30 days Up to 32% will have a recurrent stroke within 30 days 1 in 4 stroke patients have a recurrent stroke

5 Brain Attack! Vladimir C. Hachinski MD Canadian Neurologist
r-TPA currently the only FDA approved treatment for acute stroke to be given within 4.5 HOURS of the start of symptoms. The majority of patients don't report to the emergency room until more than 24 hours after the onset of stroke symptoms 52 % of acute stroke patients unaware they were experiencing a stroke.

6 Current organisation of care in UK
National Sentinel Audit Stroke units % % 83% Thrombolysis offered % % Neurovascular clinics % % 98% Rapid transfer protocols % % 22% High risk patients seen < 7 days % % TIA clinic median waiting (days) 1 FPH

7 Current emergency care in UK
National Sentinel Audit vs vs. 2014 Access to brain imaging < 12 hours 48% vs % Access to brain imaging < 24 hours 95% vs % Thrombolysis offered to eligible pts 18% vs. 50% vs % WHAT HAS CHANGED? Stroke Telemedicine Ambulance Services Pre-alerts 24 imaging and reporting for CT / CT in ED ED led thrombolysis

8 “There is more to stroke prevention than CEA” – AR Naylor 2007

9 Risk factors for stroke
Modifiable Hypertension Smoking Hyperlipidaemia High grade carotid stenosis Atrial Fibrillation Diabetes Controversial e.g. OCP, Obesity, Alcohol Non-modifiable Age Male sex Ethnicity

10

11 Fate of symptomatic carotid disease
Stroke incidence 1 Year 5 years Previous Symptoms TIA % 30-35% Stroke % % Norris JW et al. Stroke 1991

12 Fate of asymptomatic carotid disease
1 Year < 75% ICA stenosis 1.5% Stroke > 75% ICA stenosis 3.3% Stroke 7.5% TIA Norris JW et al. Stroke 1991

13 Does plaque morphology matter?
Risk of stroke in symptomatic patients 95% stenosis % Non-ulcerated plaque 95% stenosis % Ulcerated plaque NASCET study 1991

14 Does symptomatic carotid stenosis matter?

15 Which patients should be treated first?
4799 patients tested using ABCD (2) score 2-day risk of stroke Score of 0 – 3 (1012 patients) 1% Score of 4 – 5 (2169 patients) 4.1% Score of 6 – 7 (1628 patients) 8.1% Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007

16 Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA)

17 The earliest report Loucks et al. 1936
Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Young male with recurrent TIAs Right hemiplegia and aphasia Excision of ICA occlusion Patient recovered Archives of Surgery 1938

18 Speed is of the essence! Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in
a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia Eastcott, Pickering and Rob Lancet 1954 First carotid endarterectomy 1953 De Bakey JAMA 1975

19 The evolution of carotid surgery
Reported 1955 Reported 1954 Reported 1975

20 Pre-CEA imaging – current UK
Duplex only % Duplex and MRA 13% Duplex and arch angiogram 9% Duplex and CTA % MRA only 2% CTA only % Arch angiogram only % GALA trial preliminary data Gough et al. 2007 Leeds

21 Mofidi et al. 2006

22 To patch or not to patch? GALA Trial (current UK practice) Always 75%
Selective 20% Never % “Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for CEA” Bond et al. 2003 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Outcome no different for different patch types Significant reductions Stroke Death Early Thrombosis Late Restenosis

23 Intra-operative cerebral perfusion
Never shunt 5% Speed Shunt all patients 70% Mainly GA patients Selectively shunt 25% Stump pressures 25% EEG 5% TCD 35% Awake patient – regional cervical block “Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for CEA” Bond et al. 2001 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews No evidence to support a policy of routine, selective or no shunting

24 How does surgery compare with best medical therapy in symptomatic carotid disease?
Primary Endpoint Trial N Stenosis (%) Medical Surgical P value ARR NNT NASCET 1991 659 >70 32.3 15.8 <0.001 11.3 9 ECST 3008 21.9 12.3 1.5 68 VASST 189 >50 19.4 7.7 0.01 17.2 6

25 Surgery versus Stenting outcomes
CAVATAS 2001 LEXINGTON 1 SAPPHIRE 2004 EVA-3S 2006 SPACE ICSS 2010 CREST CEA / CAS 71% No Symptoms Number randomised 253 / 251 53 / 51 151 / 156 262 / 265 595 / 605 855 / 858 1251 / 1271 Cranial nerve 8.7% / 0% 8.0 % / NS 5.3% / 0% 7.7% / 1.1% NS / NS 5.3% / 0.1% 4.7% / 0.3% Wound 6.7%/ 1.2 % 8.0% / 0 % 10.6% / 8.3% 1.2% / 3.1% 5.8% / 3.6% 0.2% / 1.6% Stroke 9.9% / 10% 0% / 0% 20 % / 12% / 9.6% 7.4 % / 6.8% 4.1% / 7.5% 2.3 %/ 4.1% Death 2 % / 3 % 1.9% / 0 % Combined 6% 1.2% / 0.8% 0.9% / 0.7% 0.8% / 2.2% 0.3% / 0.7% Combined Any Stroke 5.9% / 6.4% 1.9% / 0% 6.1 % / 5.8% For AS patients 3.9% / 9.6% 6.5% / 7.7% 5.2% / 8.5% 3.2% / 6.0%

26 What would you rather choose?

27 Are you sure you still want a stent?

28 Carotid endarterectomy outcomes
*N=2236 2007 J Vas Surg *N=5513 2008 30-day Stroke / TIA (%) 3.1% (n=5) 1.4% 1.8% 30-day MI (%) 2.5% (n=4) 0.5% 0.8% 30-day Death (%) 0.6% Cranial Nerve Injuries (%) 2.1% (n=2) 0.4% 4.5% Return to theatres 0.6% (n=1) NS 2.1% Median length of stay (days) 3 4.3 Asymptomatic patients 8.8% FPH 64% MGH 16% NVD

29 Vascular Services Quality Improvement Programme (VSQIP)
November 2014 Surgeon outcomes for carotid endarterectomy Dates 1st October 2010 to 30th September 2013 Institution No. of Procedures Patients Discharged Without stroke / death in 30 days Adjusted rate of stroke / death % Days from symptom to surgery Median (IQR) Length of stay (days) Median (IQR) FPH 211 207 2.0 8 (5,12) 2 (1,5) National 2.5 12

30 Rationale for delaying CEA
Risks of haemorrhagic transformation infarct with early surgery in acute stroke Delay of 4-6 weeks recommended Wylie (1964) Thompson (1970) DeWeese (1971) Torgovnick (2007)

31 When should surgery be offered
When should surgery be offered? Risk of stroke and timing of carotid endarterectomy

32 DOES TIMING OF SURGERY MATTER
DOES TIMING OF SURGERY MATTER? Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration (CETC) Number of ipsilateral strokes prevented at five years by performing 1000 CEAs in symptomatic patients with 50-99% stenoses relative to days from last symptom to surgery (based on reanalysis of CETC data) Rothwell Lancet 2004

33 Faster surgery for females
“Benefit from CEA in women was apparent in those randomized within 2 weeks of their last symptomatic ischemic event” “Current guidelines in Europe and the USA which state only that CEA should be performed within 6 months of last symptoms should be amended in the light of these results.” Rothwell PM et al. Stroke 2004; 35:

34 Median time to surgery Days
Delays! Delays! Delays! Median time to surgery Days UK national carotid audit Newcastle audit Oxford audit GALA trial Frimley Park Hospital Frimley Park Hospital

35 12% admitted patients required surgery
University of Calgary experience Stroke 2006 12% admitted patients required surgery 72% operated within 2 weeks in 2002 92% operated within 2 weeks in 2004 37% operated within 2 weeks on NVD 14% operated within 2 weeks at Frimley in 2010 100% operated within 2 weeks at Frimley in 2014

36 All TIA or non-disabling stroke
43 consecutive patients 12 months prior to NICE stroke guidelines (July 2008) All TIA or non-disabling stroke 94% patients scored ABCD2 > 4 (high risk) Mean time to consultant vascular opinion 28 days 81% patients had carotid duplex within 7 days 32% of high risk patients had CT scan within 24 hours 14% of patients had surgery within 2 weeks ASIT Conference Nottingham March 2009

37 Conclusions (in 2008) WE WERE NOT FAST ENOUGH!
Significant delays existed in our local urgent carotid surgery pathway prior to the NICE guidelines (July 2008).

38 7 days 48hrs from diagnosis According to NICE How quickly do we
need to investigate & Treat symptomatic Carotid Stenosis? 7 days South East Coast Stroke Clinical Reference Group target for CEA 48hrs from diagnosis

39 Stroke and TIA Surgical Helpline – allow direct consultant to consultant referrals from HASU and acute stroke unites from RSCH, BNHH and HWPH SEND IMAGES VIA IEP and FAX PATIENT DETAILS GPs to refer to their nearest HASU or Acute Stroke units or Rapid Access TIA clinic - MDT

40 Limitations of CEA Severe OA / ankylosis cervical spine
Long length lesions High bifurcations (above C2) Previous cervical surgery Previous cervical irradiation Concomitant intra-cranial lesion Concomitant thoracic lesion Medically “high risk” patient

41 The first report of endoluminal carotid intervention
“Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation endarterectomy.” Kerber CW et al. 1980 Am J Neuroradiol

42 Carotid artery stenting (CAS)

43 Overview of CAS Patient preparation Femoral access
Aortic arch angiogram Selective arch vessel cannulation Intracranial and extracranial cannulation Common carotid sheath access EPD placement Predilatation, stenting and postdilatation Completion angiogram EPD removal Access site management Postprocedural care and followup Overview of CAS

44 Catch of the day!

45 Risk of micro-emboli: CAS vs. CEA
Diffusion-weighted MRI Events in the 48 hours following CEA and CAS. 19 / 27 (70%) CAS vs. 0 / 19 (0%) CEA 9 ipsilateral / 7 bilateral / 3 contralateral 3 CAS patients had post-operative neurology but all resolved within 36 hours. The only factor associated with the development of microemboli was the use of a diagnostic arch angiogram. Preoperative MRI/A or CT-A recommended as alternative instead

46 NICE guidance for CAS Safe and efficacious in the short term
Unsure about benefits in asymptomatic Clear written information with consent Audit and review all cases Submit cases to registries and studies Last updated September 2006

47 Asymptomatic carotid disease - what was known before ACST
ACAS (USA) 1995 If a patient had a CEA before developing symptoms, they might be less likely to have a stroke, providing the operation had a very low morbidity and mortality Benefits confined to men under 65 years No difference in outcome for stenosis 60-99% Benefits were not greater for those with tighter stenosis as seen in the symptomatic trials MAJORITY OF PATIENTS IN USA & EUROPEAN SERIES ARE ASYMPTOMATIC! ACST (UK) 2003 1560 allocated immediate CEA 1560 allocated follow-up with deferred CEA 3.4 years mean follow-up

48 Asymptomatic Carotid Studies Total 5 year Stroke related mortality

49 What we know post ACST Benefits significant for men as well as for women up to the age of 75 years. Benefits seen in patients with a stenosis > 70% on ultrasound. 5 year net risk of all strokes in ACST. 6% with immediate CEA 12% with deferred CEA Fatal and disabling stroke, not just stroke overall was prevented by surgery.

50 ACST Caveats Best medical therapy (BMT) not optimised.
Higher event rates compared with medical trials. Surgeons with event rates > 3%? CAPRIE (n= 19185) 2 yr Stroke, MI, Vascular Death 5.8% ASA vs. 5.3% Plavix 4S study (n=4444) Simvastatin 2.7% vs. Placebo 4.3% No plaque morphology characterisation.

51 RCTs of CEA for asymptomatic disease
Primary Endpoint Trial N Stenosis (%) Medical Surgical P value ARR NNT VA 1993 444 >50 20.6 8 <0.001 3 32 ACAS 1995 1662 >60 11 5.1 0.004 1.2 85 CASANOVA 2001 410 50-90 NS ACST 2004 3120 11.8 6.4 1.1 93

52 Future asymptomatic data
ECST-2 Role of BMT + Surgery vs. BMT FPH will be recruiting Dr. Giosue Gulli PI ACST -2 Role of CEA vs. CAS. Funding approved. Now recruiting. TACIT Role of BMT vs. BMT + CEA vs. BMT + CAS

53 Timing of surgery and efficacy
Risks of further stroke are the highest in the first 2 weeks following TIA/Minor stroke Early carotid surgery is safe in ASA I / II patients following stable, non-disabling stroke Safer to delay ASA III / IV patients Patients with large areas of brain injury on CT or MRI Patients with unstable symptoms are at higher risk of peri-operative stroke

54 Future role for Best medical therapy?
Antiplatelets NOACs Statins Antihypertensives

55 Can we go faster? RACE (Rapid Access Carotid Endarterectomy)
Follow the local Stroke/TIA pathways Refer to TIA clinic or ED Stroke units to admit high risk ABCD2 > 4 patients Fast track investigations for TIA/Stroke Surgical referral to vascular surgeon – USE HOTLINE Inform colleagues in primary and secondary care

56 Summary The use of a stroke/TIA pathway to expedite access to assessment Imaging and treatment is mandatory. Carotid endarterectomy remains the “gold standard” in intervention for symptomatic carotid disease. The ideal patient group for CAS remains to be defined and long term results from ICSS and CREST are awaited. The traditional indications for CAS still hold. CAS patients should be entered into registries. There is no place for the routine screening of patients for asymptomatic carotid disease.


Download ppt "Mr. Patrick Chong Consultant Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google