1. Methods and Tehniques in Surface Science Prof. Dumitru LUCA “Alexandru Ion Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania

2. Hamamatsu, November 2007 1887 – Discovery of the photoelectric effect (PE): Heinrich Hertz Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn, (1886 – 1978) Univ. of Upsala, Sweden. Nobel prize in 1924 for his results in X-ray spectroscopy. Kai M. Siegbahn (SON!) (1918 - ). Nobel prize in 1981 for his discoveries in high-resolution electron spectroscopy. Historic 1950’s – huge progress in instrumentation: - increasing the resolution of the photoelectron energy analysers, - design of X-ray sources. - application for surface analysis (named ESCA) by K. Siegbahn and co-workers - also now - the discovery of the PE in gases (Turner and co- workers) and the development of the UPS (Spicer and co-workers) 1895 – Discovery of X-rays: Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen 1901 – Awarded (the FIRST) Nobel prize. 1905 – Explanation of the PE by Albert Einstein. 1921 – Awarded Nobel prize. H. Hertz W.C. Roentgen A. Einstein K.M.G. Siegbahn Kai M. Siegbahn 1960: occurrence of commercial XPS instruments.

3. Hamamatsu, November 2007 What information can be derived from the XPS spectra? The most frequently used experimental technique in Surface Science to extract information on: The relative chemical composition in the surface region, The chemical status of elements, The dispersion of some phases within other phases, The depth profile of chemical composition, Valence band level structure. The “universal” curve: the dependence of the inelastic mean free path inel of photoelectrons, on their energy.

4. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Electron spectroscopies Vac V E L2,3 E L1 E K Vac 3s 2p 6 2s 2 1s 2 Ultraviolet Electron Spectroscopy UPS UV photons KE = h -E V -   X-rays KE = h -E L1 -  X-ray Electron Spectroscopy XPS X-rays or electrons KE = E K -E L1 -E L23 -  Auger Electron Spectroscopy AES

5. Hamamatsu, November 2007 XPS vs. UPS 1. In XPS, holes are excited by X rays within the core level of the atom to derive the binding energy of the electrons in the lower lewels. After a core-level electron absorbs (integrally!) the energy of the X-ray photon, it leaves the atom, thus becoming a photo-electron: KE = h – E b – E r -  - δE ≈ h – E b – , 2. In UPS, similar phenomena occur, except for UV potons are used here. The photo-electrons originate now in the valence band of the element(s). Mg K α - 1253,6 eV Fwhm= 0.75 eV Al Ka = 1486.6 eVFwhm= 0.95 eV Cu Ka = 8047 eV Fwhm= 2.6 eV

6. Hamamatsu, November 2007 KE→ BE Mg K  330 eV 690 eV 720 eV 910 eV 920 eV Transformarea (KE) in E B (BE = h  KE) 343 eV 333 eV 534 eV 561 eV 581 eV 673 eV 920 eV 0-8 (4-12) eV (4d, 5s) 54, 88 eV (4s, 4p)

7. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Intensity N(E) E cin = hν - E B Energie de legatura, E B (eV) Nivele adanci 0 eV EFEF Banda de valenta Banda de conductie http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~ppzpjm/sect6_1. htm

8. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Spin-orbital splitting

9. Hamamatsu, November 2007 BE-Z

10. The charge transfer between neighboring atoms results in the alterations of the binding energies of the atom. A core level electron “feels” the nucleus more strongly than a valence electron (due to the differences in dimensions of the two types of orbitals). Thus, the electrostatic potential created by valence electrons as experienced by a core level electron is q/r v. By losing a valence electron, the BE of the electron in a core-level of the atom becomes larger. 1s 2 Li 2 O 2s density Li O 2s 2 2p 6 2s Li-metal 1s 2 Li: 1s 2 2s 1 O: 1s 2 2s 2 2p 4 EFEF Binding Energy 0 Li-metal Li 2 O Chemical shift: wat is it and why does it occur?

11. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Chemical shift The BE values are affected not only by the energy levels, specific for any element. The BE values depend (to a lesser extent) on the chemical state of that element, since the core-level electrons are affected by the chemical state of the atom. Usually, chemical shift values are ranging between 1 and 5 eV. 4.3 eV 2.1 eV

12. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Instrumentation

13. The PHI VersaProbe 5000 XPS machine View of the XPS machine in our lab with the following options: (a)XPS with chemical imaging; (b)AES; (c)Depth profiling; (d) UPS (future development)

14. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Quantitative analysis using XPS: Relative elemental composition where I i – intensity of the p - peak, corresponding to the element i,  I – ionisation cross-section (Scofield factor) of the element i (values calculated and tabulated for all the elements,including Al K  and Mg K  ) n i – average concentration of the element i in the surface region, I – mean free path for the inelastic collision of a photoelectron of the element I, K – all the remaining factors involved in the detection of the photoelectrons, θ – take-off angle of photoelectrons. Typical accuracy:  10% I i =F x  i (E K ) n i i (E k ) K cos θ

15. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Background subtraction Shirley background [D.A. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B5, 4709, 1972] linear background step background

16. Hamamatsu, November 2007 An example: the atomic percentage in a catalyst calculated from peak areas ElementPeak area (arb. units) ASFPercentage (%) Carbon18530.31922.1 Oxygen142400.7562.0 Vanadium38402.06.3 Phosphor14940.649.6 Atomic Percent = VPO Catalyst

17. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Conclusion The main features of the XPS:  Chemical identification: all the elements except for H and He,  Probing depth: 1 – 6 nm,  Detection limit: 0.1%,  Determine the atomic environment and the oxidation state,  Determine the depth-profile of the elemental concentration,  Information about surface electrical properties from surface electrical charging, Lateral resolution: tens of micrometers; Energy resolution in BE: 10 meV.

18. Hamamatsu, November 2007 Further references 1. D. Briggs, M. P. Seah, Practical surface analysis, vol. I, Willey and Sons, 1990. 2. J. M. Walls, R. Smith, Surface Science Techniques, Pergamon, 1994. 3. H. Lüth, Surfaces and interfaces of solid materials, Springer, 1993. 4. J. W. Niemantsverdriet, Spectroscopy in Catalysis – An Introduction, Wiley-VCH, 1995. 5. http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/surfaces/scc/scat5_3.htmhttp://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/surfaces/scc/scat5_3.htm 6. C.D. Wagner, W.M. Riggs, L.E. Davis, J.F. Moulter, G.E. Muilenberg, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corp. (1978). 7. C.D. Wagner, Practical Surface Analysis, Vol. 1, 2ª, J. Wiley and Sons, 1990. 8. W.N. Delgass, G.L. Haller, R. Kellerman, J.H. Lunsford, Spectroscopy in heterogeneous catalysis, Cap. 8: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Academic Press (1979). 9. H.D. Hagstrum, J.E. Rowe, J.C. Tracy, Electron spectroscopy of solid surfaces, in Experimental methods in catalytic research, Vol. 3, R.B Anderson y P.T. Dawson (Ed.), Academic Press (1976). 10. C.D. Wagner, L.E. Davis, M.V. Zeller, J.A. Taylor, R.M. Raymond, L.H. Gale, Surf. Interf. Anal. 3 (1981) 21. (for atomic sensitivity factors). 11. Moulder, John F., William F. Stickle, Peter E. Sobol, and Kenneth D. Bomben, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, ed. Jill Chastain and Roger C. King Jr. 1995: Physical Electronics, Inc., USA. 11 12. http://seallabs.com/howes1.html 13. http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/elm_in_comp_res.asp?elm1=C