1. Cystatin C– and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Vascular Disease, and Mortality in Persons With Diabetes in the U.S. Featured Article: Ching-Wei Tsai, Morgan E. Grams, Lesley A. Inker, Josef Coresh, and Elizabeth Selvin Diabetes Care Volume 37: 1002-1008 April, 2014

2. STUDY OBJECTIVE Serum cystatin C is an alternative to serum creatinine for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) Performance of GFR estimated using cystatin C (eGFRcys) was compared with that using creatinine (eGFRcr) for the identification of reduced kidney function and its association with diabetes complications Tsai et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1002-1008

3. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Data were analyzed from adult participants from the 1999– 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with available cystatin C Kidney function was dichotomized as preserved or reduced using the 2012 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) cystatin C and the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equations Tsai et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1002-1008

4. RESULTS Among 778 diabetes patients, the prevalence of reduced kidney function was 16.5% using eGFRcr and 22.0% using eGFRcys More people with diabetes were reclassified from preserved kidney function by eGFRcr to reduced kidney function by eGFRcys than people without diabetes Tsai et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1002-1008

5. RESULTS Associations between lower eGFR and higher prevalence of albuminuria, retinopathy, peripheral arterial disease, and coronary artery disease were robust regardless of filtration marker Risk of all-cause mortality increased with lower eGFRcr and eGFRcys Only lower eGFRcys was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality Tsai et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1002-1008

7. CONCLUSIONS More people with diabetes had reduced kidney function by eGFRcys than by eGFRcr Lower eGFRcys was strongly associated with diabetes complications Whether eGFRcys is superior to eGFRcr in approximating true kidney function in a diabetic population requires additional study Tsai et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1002-1008