Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CTF Analysis and Terminal Loss

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CTF Analysis and Terminal Loss"— Presentation transcript:

1 CTF Analysis and Terminal Loss
P UCC Time P After-tax PW = P (CTF)

2 How does this modify the present worth?
Now suppose we sell the item after N years for a terminal loss.. UCC Terminal Loss Salvage N How does this modify the present worth?

3 We gain the salvage payment, but lose its future tax shield
UCC Salvage In Year N, this is worth S (CSF)

4 We get immediate tax relief for the terminal loss, but lose
its future tax shield… UCC Terminal loss = T Tax saving = Tt Lost shield = T(1-CSF) This assumes that the company is profitable despite the terminal loss In Year N, this is worth Tt - T(1-CSF)

5 So the net present worth of these cashflows is: PW = P(CTF)
UCC Terminal Loss Salvage N So the net present worth of these cashflows is: PW = P(CTF) + (S(CSF) + Tt - T(1-CSF))(P/F,i,N)

6 Present Value of a Bank Loan
I borrow P from a bank at interest rate i. My MARR is j A = P(A/P,i,N) PW = P – A(P/A,j,N) If i > j, is PW positive or negative?

7 Uncertainty Analysis November 10, 2014

8 Making Confident Decisions in an Uncertain World
If we have probability estimates for different futures, we can undertake risk analysis Lacking probability estimates, we can try: break-even analysis sensitivity analysis scenario analysis

9 Break-Even Analysis The purpose of break-even analysis is to focus our uncertainty: Rather than ask, ``What is the value of x?’’ we ask ``Is x greater than a threshold x0?’’ That is to say, we set an aspiration level for x

10 Background to break-even analysis: Profit
Variable Costs Royalties, spoilage, packaging, maintenance, direct labour, raw material, direct supplies, direct supervision, sales commissions Fixed Costs Rent, Interest, Research, Insurance, Depreciation, Property Taxes, Advertising Budget, Technical Services, Executive Salaries Selling price of 1 unit

11 Profit Variable Costs Fixed Costs Total Revenue Total Costs BEP
Units sold

12 Contribution = Selling Price – Variable Cost/Unit
So BEP = Fixed Costs/Contribution

13 Profit Margin The profit margin is an indicator of the health of an organization. Margin = Gross Annual Profit/Fixed Annual Costs or Actual Sales – Break-Even Sales Margin = Break-Even Sales

14 A pie company has two employees who each earn $30,000 a year, and pays $10,000 rent every year. The ingredients for a pie, including the gas to cook it, cost $10 per pie. If pies are sold at $20 each, the break-even point for the company (calculated pre-tax) is: 3,500 pies 4,000 pies 6,000 pies 7,000 pies

15 If the company in the previous question pays taxes at 50%, the (after-tax) breakeven point is:
7,000 pies 8,000 pies 12,000 pies 14,000 pies

16 How can this company increase profits?
Total Cost Profit Selling Price Volume of Sales

17 New Selling Price Total Cost Profit Profit Total Cost a) Increase price

18 Total Cost Profit Profit Profit Total Cost Total Cost b) Increase sales

19 Total Cost Profit Profit Profit Profit Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost c) Decrease costs and price

20 Example: A firm makes units that sell for $35,000 each.
Variable costs are $20,000/unit and fixed costs are $600,000. The plant can produce 80 units a year, but is currently only working at 60% capacity. The firm is considering reducing selling price by $2,000/unit, adding a feature to each unit that increases variable costs by $1,000, and spending $120,000 on ads to increase sales. If these measures increase sales to 72 units per year, what happens to the BEP and the profit margin? Suppose instead the firm went to 200% capacity and sold the extra units at $25K each, how would this affect gross profits?

21 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
The cost of making one more unit is usually not a fixed amount. It typically shows a minimum as production goes from under-utilised to over-utilised. Marginal cost Unit costs No. Produced

22 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
As a result, the average variable cost also increases… Marginal cost Unit costs Average variable cost No. Produced

23 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
However, the average fixed cost always goes down… Marginal cost Unit costs Average variable cost Average fixed cost No. Produced

24 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
So the average total cost of production displays a minimum… Marginal cost Average total cost Unit costs Average variable cost Average fixed cost No. Produced

25 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
Similarly, in order to increase sales beyond a certain level, it may be necessary to drop the selling price Revenue and costs Total Revenue = 21000n0.5 n, No. Produced

26 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
The fixed costs must be met. Revenue and costs Fixed Costs No. Produced

27 Non-Linear Break-Even Analysis
Including the variable costs, we see there are two break even points Variable costs Revenue and costs BEP BEP No. Produced

28 Sensitivity Analysis Having solved a problem, we determine the sensitivity of the solution to changes in the problem parameters. Hence we can decide whether and when to do further research. Example: a project has an initial cost of $170,000 and is expected to yield annual receipts of $35,000. There will be a salvage value of $20,000 after ten years, and the annual operating cost will be $3,000. If the MARR is 13%, should the investment be made?

29 30,000 20,000 10,000 -30% -20% -10% +10% +20% +30% -10,000 Salvage costs have little effect -20,000 -30,000

30 30,000 20,000 10,000 -30% -20% -10% +10% +20% +30% -10,000 Nor do the running costs… -20,000 -30,000

31 30,000 20,000 10,000 -30% -20% -10% +10% +20% +30% -10,000 But the solution is sensitive to the worth of the annual receipts… -20,000 -30,000

32 30,000 20,000 10,000 -30% -20% -10% +10% +20% +30% -10,000 And to the assumed life of the equipment…. -20,000 -30,000

33 30,000 20,000 10,000 -30% -20% -10% +10% +20% +30% -10,000 -20,000 Lastly, the MARR has an effect on the present value. -30,000

34 Another way of presenting these results is
by plotting acceptance-rejection zones. Consider the same proposal, and compare the effect of annual receipts, x, and costs, y, on the EAW: EAW = -130,000(A/P,13,10)+35,000(1+x) -3,000(1+y)+20,000(A/F,13,10) = ,000x – 3,000y

35 Rejection Zone (EAW < 0) y-axis: Disbursements +30% +20% +10% -30%
-20% -10% +10% +20% +30% x-axis: Receipts -10% -20% -30%

36 An isoquant is a curve showing what combinations
Isoquants An isoquant is a curve showing what combinations of two parameters would yield the same present worth 15 Accept 10 Life of Asset Reject 5 30,000 35,000 40,000 Annual Receipts

37 Comparison of Alternatives
Factor Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Annual Receipts $35,000 First Cost $170,000 $116,400 Salvage Value $20,000 Annual Costs $3,000 $3,000 increasing annually by $2,500 Based on a ten-year study period, both alternatives look about the same. How sensitive is this conclusion to the length of the study period?

38 10,000 20,000 30,000 -10,000 -20,000 -30,000 Alt. 1 Present Worth Alt. 2 5 10 15 20 Study Period

39 Scenario Analysis …also sometimes known as the `Goldilocks’ method…

40 Scenario Analysis We compare the base case with plausible `best case’ and `worst case’ scenarios: Item Worst Base Best Additional units 60,000 75,000 100,000 Price/unit $2 $3 $3.50 Annual income $120,000 $225,000 $350,000 Duration of income 5 years 6 years 7 years Training cost/year $45,000 $35,000 $30,000 Intensive training 2 years 1 year Operating costs $90,000 $160,000 $275,000 Consumables PW

41 Scenario Analysis We compare the base case with plausible `best case’ and `worst case’ scenarios: Item Worst Base Best Additional units 60,000 75,000 100,000 Price/unit $2 $3 $3.50 Annual income $120,000 $225,000 $350,000 Duration of income 5 years 6 years 7 years Training cost/year $45,000 $35,000 $30,000 Intensive training 2 years 1 year Operating costs $90,000 $160,000 $275,000 Consumables PW -$2,594 $156,086 $255,493


Download ppt "CTF Analysis and Terminal Loss"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google