Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Longwood University Professional Education Unit 2009-2010 Annual Report.

Published byTyler Griffin Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Longwood University Professional Education Unit 2009-2010 Annual Report."— Presentation transcript:

1 Longwood University Professional Education Unit 2009-2010 Annual Report

2 2009-2010 Teacher Prep Entry ProgramNumberGPA&Test Score Art63.20 Bio22.70 Elem933.12 Elem-Mid152.98 English93.30 History123.18 Math33.50 Middle93.13 Music43.25 PHETE62.78 SPED333.17 Theatre32.87 Unit1983.13

3 2009 Disposition Assessments - Overall CF9 A CF9 B CF9 C CF9 D CF 9E CF 9F CF9 G CF9 H CF 9I CF 9J CF9 K CF 9L Art5.0 Biology4.02.52.03.54.0 3.04.02.03.52.0 Elementary4.8 4.74.8 4.74.84.74.8 Elementary-Middle5.0 English5.0 History4.74.34.24.64.7 4.44.74.24.64.2 Middle5.0 Music5.0 Physical Educ3.63.93.43.94.44.14.63.94.63.74.0 Special Educ5.0 Dispositions indicate some variance by program area. Please note your individual program areas for response.

4 Unit Disposition Data for Student Teaching CF9ACF9BCF9CCF9DCF9ECF9FCF9GCF9HCF9ICF9JCF9KCF9L Overall Averages4.784.684.584.734.804.734.834.654.754.554.58 While this data indicates a disposition rating of 4.55-4.78 out of a possible 5. Programs responded to individual student data on an as needed basis.

5 Unit Dispositions for Early Clinical CF9ACF9BCF9CCF9DCF9ECF9FCF9GCF9HCF9ICF9JCF9KCF9L Overall Averages3.933.573.433.294.294.364.073.574.293.573.71 You will note in comparison of this with the preceding slide that the Unit appears to show growth in dispositions as the candidates mature during the ITP process. Please review your program folders for individual student data.

6 Diversity Data regarding Candidate exposure in Clinical Placement Working with Student With Special Needs % of Candidates working with Students With Physical Impairments a 504 Plan 34% % of Candidates working with an IEP76% % of Candidates working with ESL29% % of Candidates working with Gifted38% Working with Diverse Students % of Candidates working with African American Students 92% % of Candidates working with Native American/Alaska Native Students 5% % of Candidates working with Hispanic Students 53% % of Candidates working with Asian Students31% % of Candidates working with Diverse Students (Aggregate) 92% Please note the overall diversity of our partnership sites (available in Can Teach in the OPS folder. Percentages of Field Experiences by Category Types

7 Unit Demographic Data – Spring 2010 CANDIDATE ETHNICTY n%Average GPA American Indian or Alaska Native 5 1% 2.77 Asian 61% 2.93 Black or African American 384% 2.68 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0% - Hispanic or Latino 192% 2.90 White 83289% 3.01 Two or more races 323% - Race/ethnicity unknown 00% - Total932100% Female 80186% 3.02 Male 13114% 2.82 Total932 Overall GPA2.99 DIVERSITY Percentage11% Please note the next slide and your program folders for demographic data for individual programs

8 Diversity Percentage of the Unit and By Program 2010 DIVERSITY PERCENTAGE COMPARISONS BY PROGRAM Overall Diversity 11% Art 16% CSDS 15% Elementary 8% Elem-Middle 14% English 7% History/SSE 10% Math 16% Middle 3% Modern Language 9% Music 14% PHETE 16% Science 13% Special Ed 6% Theatre 29% Please review your program folders in Can Teach for individual program data.

9 Teacher Work Sample Data 2009-10 The data indicate that 89% of the candidates scores 3’s or 4’s, Please consider your individual candidates and programs when reviewing this information

10 LU TWS CF Standard 2 - Planning The unit effectively had 100% of the candidates scoring 3’s on the planning standard.

11 TWS CF Standard 4 89+% candidates scored a 3 on standard 4

12 TWS CF Standard 5 Evaluation and Assessment 100% or the unit candidates scored 3’s on this assessment of the teacher work sample

13 TWS Data 2010 The Unit candidates scored 100% 3’ with the diversity assessment.

14 TWS – CF9 Dispositions The teacher work sample ratings for dispositions reflect the findings of our other data regarding candidates with in the unit. 99% of the candidates passed each TWS component.

15 Praxis and other Scores by program area ProgramName of Licensure# of test Takers%Passing Elementary EducationVRA118100 Elementary EducationElementary120100 Literacy and CultureVRA20100 English 9100 Middle School 1384 Social Studies 1191 Music 3100 Art 6100 Foreign Language 0NA ScienceBiology2100 PHETEHealth and PE5100 UNITVCLA174100 Pass Rates on Content Licensure test for Initial Teacher Preparation 2009-10

16 GPA Comparison: Program & Unit data NOTE: THIS DATA DOES NOT FOLLOW A PARTICULAR STUDENT GROUP THESE NUMBERS ARE SOLEY BASED ON THE TERM PRESENTED TERM 07-08 ProgramsEnrollmentEntry into Teacher PrepCompletion Unit2.953.083.33 Art2.953.232.50 Biology/Science2.842.952.94 Business3.09 CSDS3.063.30 Elementary3.003.023.30 Elem-Middle3.063.123.32 English2.843.433.38 History/SSE2.933.173.60 Math3.063.32 Middle3.053.113.38 Modern Language2.993.033.32 Music2.802.603.60 Physical Ed2.843.053.29 Special Ed.3.003.033.32 Theatre3.442.513.86

17 2009-10 TERM ProgramsEnrollmentEntry into Teacher PrepCompletion Unit3.043.133.34 Art3.043.203.36 Science (Biol/Chem)2.902.702.97 Elementary3.12 3.36 Elem-Middle3.222.983.28 English3.243.303.65 History/SSE2.753.183.28 Math2.893.503.47 Middle2.963.133.43 Modern Language2.95 Music3.153.253.46 Physical Ed2.322.782.99 Special Ed.3.043.173.30 Theatre3.412.873.21

18 Final Clinical Evaluation The Graph CF1 Program Comparisons across programs areas of Content Knowledge is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding content knowledge. The unit average was 82%.

19 Graph CF4 – Implementation/Management 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual The Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of establishing classroom management.

20 Final Clinical Evaluations Program comparisons The Graph CF2 Planning: Program Comparisons across programs areas is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of planning. The unit average was 79%.

21 Conceptual Framework Standard 4 – Implementation/Management The Graph CF3 Learning Climate – Program Comparison 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of establishing a positive learning climate. The unit average was 82%.

22 The Graph CF5 – Evaluation/Assessment 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of evaluation and assessment. The unit average was 75%.

23 Please review your folders in Can Teach for Program data The Graph CF6 – Evaluation/Assessment Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of communication. The unit average was 84%.

24 The Graph CF7 – Technology Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the use of technology in instruction. The unit average was 77%.

25 The Graph CF8 – Diversity Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of working with diverse students. The unit average was 81%.

26 Final Clinical Evaluation 2009-10 % Candidates Meeting or Exceeding Expectations on Performances Progra m Area N Conten t Knowle dge Plannin g Learnin g Climate Implem en- tation /Manag ement Evaluati on/Ass essmen t Commu ni- cation Techno -logy Diver- sity Unit21099% NCI694% Art6100% Elem9999% Biology2100% 94%100%94%100%94% El/M6100% Eng11100% History13100% Library2100% Math2100% Middle19100% Music498%100% PHETE6100% SP ED33100%99%98% 97%100% 98% Theatre1100%

27 CANDIDATE ETHNICTYn%Average GPA American Indian or Alaska Native 00% Asian 10%3.65 Black or African American 186%3.76 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 00% Hispanic or Latino 62%3.70 White 27892%3.87 Two or more races 00% Race/ethnicity unknown 00% Total303 Female28193%3.86 Male227%3.83 DIVERSITY Percentage8% Graduate Education Program Diversity Unit

28 Diversity Percentage Overall8% CSDS7% C & I K-8 Math0% C& I Modern Language/0% C & I Music 100 % C&I Sped General Curr K-1233% Ed Leadership13% Elem PK-6 Initial Licensure0% English33% Guidance & Counseling29% Literacy & Culture8% Modern Language Initial Licensure0% School Library Media4% Special Education5% Graduate Education Comparisons Note C&I Music has 1 candidate

29 Full time vs. Part time GPA ComparisonsMaleFemale Full Time3.843.933.89 Part Time3.86 Diversity percentageMaleFemale Full Time6%8%92% Part Time9%7%93%

30 The dispositions Average for the Unit was 4.72 and for NCI it was 4.9 Unit Data GPA ComparisonUnit Praxis Comparisons Percentage Passing Year Progra ms # Li c Enrollm ent Entry into Teacher Prep Completio n Praxis I VCL APraxisIIVRA 2007- 08Unit 1941942.953.083.33100% 96%99% 2008- 09Unit 2072072.983.093.35100% 99%98% 2009- 2010Unit 2102103.043.133.34100% Averag eUnit2.993.103.34 Averag eNCI 14143.523.73100%

31 Please review your folders in Can Teach for individual program responses

Download ppt "Longwood University Professional Education Unit 2009-2010 Annual Report."

Similar presentations

Longwood University Professional Education Unit Annual Report 2011.

Longwood University Professional Education Unit Annual Report 2011.
Faculty Demographics 2007-2010. Faculty Demographics 2009-2010 Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*

Faculty Demographics Faculty Demographics Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.

How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.

How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general.

How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.

How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do Maryland’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Maryland’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Wisconsin’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Wisconsin’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.

How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.

How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general.

How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general.
How Closely Do Indiana’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Indiana’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Wisconsin’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Wisconsin’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general.

How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general.
How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?

How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.

How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google