1. Advancing e-learning in African Higher Education: Deliberating a research agenda

2. Approach to creating a research agenda Bottom-up – not top-down pre-prepared research questions, specific methodology and pre-determined interview schedules, questionnaire items or checklists Model a genuine partnership – not use as an opportunity to conduct research on, but conduct research with colleagues in other African universities Deliberate and create a research agenda for each institution that reflects the authentic needs of the institution and relates to educational technology intervention projects Support the research process from within each institution, rather than conducting research on behalf of the institution Support inter-university research partnerships (with other PHEA ETI institutions in the first instance) wherever possible and suitable Surface common research interests across all institutions

3. Consequences of this deliberative approach The “road less travelled ” … – uncertain – unpredictable – possibly time consuming Hopefully more … – authentic – meaningful – useful – developmental More challenging to … – develop overarching frameworks – identify all the stakeholders and data that might be useful at the commencement of the projects

4. Not a complete blank slate … Drew on preparatory work undertaken by a “think-tank” prior to the commencement of the PHEA ETI (Czerniewicz and Jaffer 2007) that identified key: – Factors – Levels – Issues and debates – Interventions – Investigations Conceptualisation of most likely types of research and timing of research studies

5. Adapted from Conole & Oliver 2007:13 Organisational Technological Political Economic Social Pedagogical & Epistemological Key factors

6. Course Key levels National Regional Global Disciplinary Institutional Course

7. LevelsKey factors Social, political and economic OrganisationalPedagogical & epistemological Technical Global National Institutional Disciplinary Course

8. LevelsKey factors Social, political and economic OrganisationalPedagogical & epistemological Technical Global Issues and debates Interventions Investigations National Institutional Disciplinary Course

9. LevelsKey factors Social, political and economic OrganisationalPedagogical & epistemological Technical Global National InstitutionalProbable key focus area for PHEA ETI Disciplinary Course

10. Type 1Type 2Type 3 BEFORE Preliminary investigation Implementation project plan Action research Implementation project DURING informsimplementevaluate AFTER Implementation project evaluate Post - implementation project

11. In the process of surfacing the framework Key framing question seems to be: How and why do African universities shape, enable or constrain the uptake and implementation of educational technologies in response to their teaching and learning challenges? Key subsidiary questions seem to include: – What are the key teaching and learning challenges faced by African universities? – What access to and use of educational technologies do students and staff in African universities have? – Why and how do African universities adopt specific educational technologies to address their particular teaching and learning challenges? – What are the key enablements of successful adoption of educational technologies and how are they best leveraged? – What are the key constraints of adopting educational technologies and how can they be addressed?

12. Purpose of a research framework To provide a shared language to underpin the PHEA E-learning proposals, initiatives and projects To locate current issues and debates in context To identify the key areas and elements of learning activities, practices and research sites in Africa, and to map key relationships between those elements To identify points of leverage for change using educational technology to address educational challenges To map the challenges against potential interventions and investigations

13. Challenges, intervention and investigation projects Challenges to be surmounted Potential intervention projects (Implementation) Potential investigation projects (Research)

14. Institutional: Social, political & economic Institutional issues and debates – Changing student needs and social divides (rural/urban, gender, class, disability) – Enabling policy environment – Economic constraints and sustainability Institutional interventions – Strategy for the inclusion of under-represented groups – Development of institutional e-learning policies – Inclusion of e-learning policies in relevant university policies – Development of a long-term sustainability plan – Linkages between institutional policies, regulations and quality assurance mechanisms

15. Institutional: Social, political & economic (cont.) Institutional investigations – How do the needs of the “information society” translate into graduate competencies and institutional direction? – What does such concepts as “any time any where” and “just in time learning” mean for university activities? – How does/can e-learning encourage access of under- represented groups to the University? – How well does the e-learning policy direct and support activities of university management, academics and students? – In what ways does e-learning support the increase of the number of students enrolling at the University? – How effective are monitoring mechanisms regarding e- learning policy and practice? – How does the institutional environment constrain and enable the take up of ICTs for teaching and learning?

16. Institutional: Organisational Institutional issues and debates – Institutional structures to support student needs – Institutional structures to enhance contribution of staff – Integration of ICTs in higher education institutions – Recognition for e-learning developments – Incentives for e-learning activities and innovation – Intellectual Property Rights and alternative licensing Institutional interventions – The development of institutional policies to enable staff in the use of ICTs for teaching – The development of institutional structures to enable staff in the use of ICTs for teaching – The development of institutional policies to support students in the use of ICTs for learning (eg computer literacy, information literacy, graduate competencies) – The development of institutional structures to support students in the use of ICTs for learning

17. Institutional: Organisational (cont.) Institutional investigations – How well does the University support staff to develop and students to use (and contribute to) e-learning materials? – What recognition systems are in place to acknowledge the development of e-learning materials? Are they adequate? Which interests do the serve and what are the implications of this? – What is the role of IPR policy in the production and dissemination of institutional resources? What are the implications of current and potential policies? – How well does the University support staff in obtaining appropriate copyright for e-learning materials? – How effective are dissemination mechanisms for the dissemination of institutional resources?

18. Institutional: Pedagogical Institutional issues and debates – Relationship between e-learning policy and curriculum development – Quality assurance mechanisms – Use of e-learning for assessment and evaluation – Linkages between infrastructure and strategy Institutional interventions – Ensure synergy between e-learning policy & curriculum development – Create quality assurance strategy – Appropriate infrastructure to support strategy decisions for teaching and learning (classroom facilities, data projectors, wireless access etc) – Rewards for good teaching with technology

19. Institutional: Pedagogical (cont.) Institutional investigations – How well do e-learning policies relate to and support curriculum development? – How exactly is quality of e-learning courses ensured? – How exactly do staff and students use e-learning to support their teaching and learning activities? – What pedagogical value do existing ICT-mediated practices bring into the current classroom activities? – What existing ICT-mediated social practices do students bring to the classroom context, which can be leveraged for teaching and learning? – Which ICT tools add value to pedagogical activities – What are the global trends of ICT-mediated pedagogical practices? How can these inform and influence local situations?

20. Institutional: Technical Institutional issues and debates – Institutional ICT infrastructure & support – Institution-wide learning management system – Other software for teaching and learning – On-campus/off campus accessibility Institutional interventions – Improvement of ICT support for students and staff – Creation of institution-wide learning management systems – Creation of institutional repository for sharing teaching and learning resources beyond university – Wireless access

21. Institutional: Technical (cont.) Institutional investigations – How well do existing structures support the use of e- learning? – What is the role of the LMS in terms of the different disciplinary communities within the university? – What long term scenarios need to be planned for? – How effective is the fit between the infrastructure and the strategic direction of the institution? – What are the enabling and constraining technological and practical factors for e-learning use?

22. Outputs of research 1. The overall research report for the entire project – suitable for inter-institutional reporting. 2. At least one research paper from each institution. Hopefully contained in a hardcopy document with an introduction and conclusion. Hopefully presented at a conference such as eLearning by someone from each institution – developed individual 3. Research paper on access and use of Educational Technology in all universities – developed collaboratively.

23. Creative Commons Licensing to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work You are free: Attribution. You must give the original author credit. to make derivative works Under the following conditions: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights. Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a licence identical to this one.