1. HRTF Update to BoT 4/27/14 1

2. Workshop Goals Demonstrate alignment with Recovery Action Plan Background and Status update on HRTF activities and findings Describe key policy issues or actions requiring BoT decisions Facilitate open discussion 2

3. The Bottom Line Key near-term policy issues or actions – Review, and reaffirm or modify past BoT decisions – If replacement housing is desired, choose a parcel(s) to pursue funding and continue process – Ensure adequate management resources are available to ToL 3

4. Alignment with Recovery Action Plan 4

5. HOU 1.3.1. (assigned to HRTF) Encourage the development/construction of housing that is affordable by: a) virtue of the lot size, regulatory incentives, construction methodology and material usage, density; b) the use of financial subsidies and volunteer organizations key partners: Planning and Community Development Commission (PCDC) and Lyons Volunteers 5

6. Analysis of HOU 1.3.1. p1 “Encourage the development/construction of housing that is affordable…” –Consistent with: Comprehensive Plan BoT stated position post-flood (but used term “replacement” rather than “affordable”) HTRF Actions to date 6

7. Analysis of HOU 1.3.1. p2 “Encourage the development/construction of housing that is affordable…” –HRTF is focusing on replacement housing that is affordable to residents that lost their homes during the flood… BoT may want to clarify the usage of affordability in this context... –The HRTF is collecting and analyzing information to support BoT or ToL decisions – it does not advocate for or encourage any particular solution to replacement housing issues (that is a BoT or ToL function) 7

8. Analysis of HOU 1.3.1. p3 HOU 1.3.1 says: “…by virtue of the lot size, regulatory incentives, construction methodology and material usage, density, and the use of financial subsidies and volunteer organizations” At this time, the HRTF is focused on supporting decisions involving: –parcel selection –granting / funding opportunities –management structure issues Other issues resolved after parcel selection 8

9. HOU 1.3.2. (assigned to HRTF) Encourage the development/construction of manufactured housing (including prefabricated, modular, and mobile homes) Key partners: none listed HRTF has formed a MFH subcommittee, and this has been a “standing agenda item” 9

10. Replacement Housing: HRTF Activities, Analysis, and Suggested BoT Decisions 10

11. HTRF Activities to Date p1 Background and Operating Assumptions Housing Needs Assessment Public Engagement Parcel Analysis 11

12. HTRF Activities to Date p2 Background and Operating Assumptions – Focus on Replacement Housing but develop Options for scenarios ranging from “No Action” to “Replacement housing + additional affordable housing”. – Replacement Housing ≠ Affordable Housing. Replacement Housing is based on unit type and value of what was lost in flood. “Affordable housing” is a subset of replacement housing 12

13. HTRF Activities to Date p3 Background and Operating Assumptions – Emphasize open and transparent processes and meetings, and public engagement – Provide input to ToL - to ensure Lyons’ application for grants (e.g. CDBG-DR) is competitive – Work with Housing Authority, DOLA, and FEMA 13

14. HTRF Activities to Date p4 Background and Operating Assumptions – Engage with NGOs and private sector – Evaluate every possible parcel, housing type, and deal structure – No net loss of park land (refer to consultation map) – Be aware of HMGP (“404” buyout) and repair support but those are ToL functions, not HRTF 14

15. HTRF Activities to Date p5 Housing Needs Assessment – Snapshot of needs based on Jan 14 data – Recommended 130 homes built to meet replacement housing needs plus latent affordable housing needs – Should be considered along with data collected by ToL during resident consultations 15

16. HTRF Activities to Date p6 Public Engagement – All meetings open / public questions allowed – Press releases and weekly newspaper updates – Open House to present initial parcel analysis and options for number of houses required to meet replacement housing needs 16

17. HTRF Activities to Date p7 Public Engagement – Website with all minutes, reference materials, HRTF output – Congruence with Recovery Working Group (Action Plan) – “Guest Speakers” OEM Habitat for Humanity Private Sector developer panels (both market and affordable housing developers) 17

18. HTRF Activities to Date p8 Panel Discussion Details (separate handout) Private sector developer panel: – High density – Mix of large/small homes (to balance loss from affordable) – Affordable homes = $250K-$300K+ – Bohn Park or Bohn Park area Affordable sector developer panel: – Need to reduce or eliminate land costs to make work – Would partner with Housing Authority – Variety of creative solutions 18

19. HTRF Activities to Date p9 Parcel Analysis Status – Revisit backup slides from previous BoT briefing (17 Mar 14 “post-Open House” workshop) – Revisit Options 2,3, and 4 (separate handout) – Add consideration of 10 Ac south of MS/HS parking lot – Add Housing Authority unit cost estimates 19

20. Key Policy Issues / Actions 20

21. Review of BoT Direction to HRTF – All displaced residents be given a chance to come back to Lyons to a home similar to what was lost – Focus on Replacement Housing first – Option 2 to Option 3 is the target number of homes – Option 4 is a worthwhile goal but better left for the future 21

22. (potential) BoT Decision Point Support, modify, or rescind previous BoT direction? Remain silent (equals assent)? 22

23. Choosing a Parcel p1 If BoT chooses to put a parcel “under control”: – Much more competitive for CDBG-DR and other funding sources (this FY focused on flood damage recovery) – HA and private sector developers can begin assembling solutions for BoT to choose from – Area Development Planning can be initiated – DOLA support (financial analysis, legal, planning) will become available 23

24. Choosing a Parcel p2 If BoT chooses to not put a parcel “under control”: – Process stops except for ADUs, etc. (equivalent of choosing “Option 1”) If Bot chooses to delay parcel choice beyond current FY funding cycle: – Comparable financial assistance unlikely to be available – Process will likely stop except for ADUs, etc. (equivalent of choosing “Option 1”) 24

25. Choosing a Parcel p3 Timing Considerations CDBG-DR: need parcel decision prior to 1 Jun to be fully competitive for – CDBG-DR phase 1 (application for part of $63M is occurring NOW) – CDBG-DR phase 2 (input into action plan is occurring NOW, much more $$ than phase 1, need parcel to ask for significant funding) Commitment to displaced residents? 25

26. Choosing a Parcel p4 What is BoT committing to by putting a parcel “under control”? – Zoning / land use designation change – Inertia towards actual development, but not full commitment Land ownership / tax structure TBD – part of deal option choices – Development configuration TBD – part of deal option choices… annexation or land swap (MS/HS?) could happen after main parcel chosen 26

27. BoT Decision Point Review main slides from previous BoT briefing (17 Mar 14 “post-Open House” workshop ) Stop Replacement Housing Activities, OR Choose a parcel(s) to initiate planning. Another workshop in narrowly focused on parcel analysis to support a final decision (this would have to be very soon – time is running out to remain competitive for CDBG-DR funding) 27

28. Management Resources Redevelopment requires a variety of specialty professional services – Financial – Planning – Legal DOLA offers some assistance for free after parcel selection CDBG-DR monies earmarked for these services 28

29. Management Resources What is the Role of the Housing Authority? – They can and should “quarterback” the development – They are ToL’s Housing Authority, and most work will be executed by private sector or the NGOs (HfH) the BoT has exhibited interest in – They are capable of helping with ALL issues (MFH, NGO or volunteer help, policy issues)… not at all limited to just programmed affordable housing 29

30. BoT Decision Point Accept DOLA assistance? Accept HA Assistance? 30