Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative."— Presentation transcript:

1 Institutional Effectiveness & Assessment @ B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative Support Services Academic and Student Support Services

2 Building Capacity Capacity: Our ability to seek solutions to our challenges so that we can achieve our goals and objectives. Capacity building: Should provide faculty and staff the skills and tools needed (state proper outcomes, identify assessments – direct and indirect, collection of data, analysis of data, use of data to drive improvement) and strengthen our ability to work together.. Creating the common vision through multiple perspectives that matches Dr. Jackson’s vision

3 Framework for Institutional Effectiveness Purpose Goals Components of IE Accountability

4 Institutional Effectiveness Purpose: To systematically engage in a process designed to monitor and document the degree to which the institution is progressing together towards accomplishing its Mission.

5 IE Goals 1.Inform the strategic planning process 2.Promote effective allocation of resources (human & fiscal) 3.Engage faculty and staff in the continuous improvement of the institution’s programs and services 4.Provide accountability to stakeholders

6 Components of IE How is the IE process supported? (leadership support, IT, faculty and staff development, policies and procedures manual, reporting templates) How is the IE process organized and coordinated? (Institutional Research, Fiscal, Assessment, IE) Planning (Mission-driven – plan and review mission simultaneously, integrated into the annual planning and budgeting cycle) Budgeting (driven by Mission and Division plans) Feedback Mechanism / Accountability Annual Reports (University, Division, Unit) 1.Annual IE report 2.Annual assessment report 3.Accreditation reports Assessment Academic Program Assessment Administrative & Educational Support Services Assessment General Education Assessment University Assessment

7 Accountability 1.Who is the audience? 2.What are the products? (IE report, Assessment report, Accreditation reports) 3.How do we most effectively communicate (convey information) to stakeholders? 4.What is the process for getting a good product?

8 The Art of Explanation “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it’s taken place.” G. Bernard Shaw Source: Keynote Speech AIR Forum Orlando, May 2014, Lee LeFever, Common Craft

9 A Culture of Evidence “Accrediting agencies – both at the institutional level and the programmatic level – are now operating in a ‘culture of evidence’ that requires institutions to qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate that they are meeting student learning goals and effectively marshalling human and fiscal resources toward that end.” Michael Middaugh Author of Planning and Assessment in Higher Education

10 Assessment Transparency Outcome Statements Specific Assessment Plans Descriptive Defines Measures Easy to download Use of Results Targeted to audience Provides examples Describes improvement Defines next steps COMMON TO ALL Clearly worded Prominently posted Updated regularly Receptive to feedback Assessment Resources Easy to download Evidence of Efficiency & Quality Interpreted results Contextualized to B-CU Presented graphically Disseminated Current Assessment Activities Defines activities Source: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA)

11 Assessment @ B-CU Assessment is an integral part of the annual planning activities at B-CU, as it determines whether or not the objectives of education are being met. The main goals in the assessment of Administrative Support Services and Academic & Student Support Services are to: 1.document what support of learning is taking place and, 2.use the results of assessment activities to improve the student learning environment.

12 Annual Planning & Assessment Report GuideTemplate

13 Staff analyzes data and makes recommendations for unit improvement. Staff reviews and revises Annual Plans. Vice-Presidents, Deans, Department Chairs and Directors submit Annual Plans for the upcoming academic year. Collect, aggregate, disaggregate data for Academic Year. Share data with Staff in Pre-Planning for Academic Year. Annual Planning and Budgeting Cycle B-CU collects assessment data to enhance outcomes in an ongoing, staff-driven continuous improvement cycle by adhering to an assessment plan which, in turn, drives the strategic plan.

14 Elements of the Report 1.Description of the Support Services in the Unit 2.Mission Statement 3.Resources Used 4.Support Specifics 5.Outcomes 6.Annual Planning and Assessment Grid 7.Assessment Plan Methods and Procedures 8.Analysis and Evaluation 9.Action Plan 10.Rubric for Assessing the Annual Assessment Report

15 Description of the Administrative / Academic and Student Support Services In this section, provide a brief overview of your unit. Be sure to describe the functions, structure, and purpose of your support services.

16 Mission Remember that the mission of the unit must be aligned with the Mission of the University and demonstrate that it supports the Mission of the University. The Mission of Bethune-Cookman University is to develop global leaders committed to service, life-long learning and diversity by providing a faith-based environment of academic excellence and transformative experiences.

17 Mission

18 Outcomes List the expected outcomes for your area (administrative or academic and student support services) as related to Division Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Bethune-Cookman University’s Strategic Goals. The professional staff in each unit are to work together to establish a limited number of overarching outcomes for the unit as a whole.

19 Outcomes Administrative / Academic & Student Support areas typically have outcomes that focus on the critical functions, services, and processes that impact the student learning environment with an emphasis on satisfaction, efficiency and quality.

20 S.M.A.R.T. Outcomes

21 Types of Assessments Satisfaction General (institutional) Specific (satisfaction with particular area) Direct Measures Volume of Activity (# of persons served) Level of Efficiency (average response time) Quality average (# of errors) External Validation Audits (financial, IT) Public Health Inspector Fire Marshall

22 Outcome Examples Outcome 1: The Office of the registrar will process transcripts in a timely manner. ELOA: 90% of transcript requests will be processed within 2 business days. Measure/Tool: Log of transcript requests (monthly) Outcome 2: The Office of the registrar will be in compliance with FERPA regulations. ELOA: 100% of employees will answer 90% of the questions correctly. Measure/Tool: Survey

23 Resources Used Briefly describe resources, including personnel, used to accomplish the outcomes. It may be beneficial to review expenditures during the fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) to categorize where resources were allocated within your unit. Areas to address in your brief description: Number of personnel utilized to accomplish each outcome Categories of expenditures that consumed a substantial portion of your budget (with computations and details when available) Physical space/facilities utilized

24 Support Specifics Teaching - Teaching - Briefly describe how your unit supports the teaching and learning enterprise. Research - Research - Briefly explain how your unit engages in activities related to research and how your unit supports research at the University. Community and Public Service - Community and Public Service - Briefly state any unit goals related to community and public service and how your unit supports service at the University.

25 Annual Planning & Assessment Grid Purposes: Show the summation and results of data analysis Tie the assessment plan to any identified, targeted strategic goals Reveal the area’s expected levels of achievement Report if the targeted level of achievement was met Explain how your area plans on using the results in terms of actions

26 Annual Planning & Assessment Grid Annual Planning and Assessment (Previous Academic Year) Mission Statement: Targeted Strategic Goal(s): T argeted Division Key Performance Indicators: Targeted Institutional Student Learning Outcome(s): Outcomes Expected Level of Achievement Measure/ToolResults Use of Results (to include analysis and Action Plan) Met Not Met

27 Annual Planning & Assessment Grid Annual Planning and Assessment (Current Academic Year) Mission Statement: Targeted Strategic Goal(s): Targeted Division Key Performance Indicators: Institutional Student Learning Outcome(s) addressed: OutcomesExpected Level of AchievementMeasure/Tool

28 Assessment Plan Methods & Procedures Describe the methods and procedures used to assess the area. Be sure to use the questions below to thoroughly cover methods and procedures involved in your assessment plan. 1.Who was/will be involved in the process of reviewing and revising the assessments? 2.What is the difference between the previous program assessments and the revised assessments? 3.How will the assessments be collected? 4.Who will collect the assessments? 5.When will the assessments be collected? 6.Who will aggregate and disaggregate the data? 7.Who will analyze the data? 8.How are / will data (be) used to drive improvement? 9.How do you want to share the information with stakeholders?

29 Analysis and Evaluation Write out a well-reasoned description of your conclusions based on the data by explaining the significance and impact of the results.

30 Action Plan Briefly summarize the actions for improvement. Describe what decisions need to be made, next steps that will be taken during the following academic year, and explain how the results are being used to inform unit changes.

31


Download ppt "Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google