Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Capital Raising: Public vs Private Issues Advanced Corporate Finance Semester 1 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Capital Raising: Public vs Private Issues Advanced Corporate Finance Semester 1 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Capital Raising: Public vs Private Issues Advanced Corporate Finance Semester 1 2009

2 2 Why Go Public? Remember majority of firm (by number not size) are private and most firms (albiet small) choose to issue private Then why list Funding demand Growth potential Distinct life cycle stages Favourable market conditions Realization of return (venture capitalist) More dispersed ownership

3 3 Who Do We Issue Securities To? Existing security holders - family or rights issue For equity renounceable rights issues (can sell your entitlement to the new shares to a third party) account for 68% of all issues Market or public issue For equity most common when firms initially listed Private placements/financial intermediaries.

4 4 Underwriting Equity Issues Underwritten firm commitment contract underwriter purchases issue and on sells it standby contract underwriter takes up unsubscribed portion of issue best effort contract Non-underwritten

5 5 Why Do Firms Underwrite Security Issues? What is the evidence The underwriter certifies firm quality The choice of underwriting firm is relevant Process expertise Firms choose most cost effective method for their shareholders Those US firms choosing standby rights have higher ownership concentration. Trade-off between fee and issue price discount Underwriting fee is a function of risk

6 6 Anomalies in IPO’s Abnormally high listing day returns Non stationary “hot markets” go to the market when prices “high” first day returns lowest in periods of high volume go public near peak of industry specific fads Back door listings In the long run IPO’s appear overpriced Average performance

7 7 First Day Returns on IPO’s

8 8 Explanations for Underpricing Asymmetry between Firm and Investors as to Firm’s Value Lemons problem Underpricing as a signal of quality Leave investor’s with a “good taste” In the game for the long run Underprice to create “goodwill” and make subsequent issues easier

9 9 Empirical Support Low balling questionable No evidence of a propensity to return to the market to raise additional funds - seasoned offering or higher dividend payout But less underpricing the higher the fractional ownership retained (but could be a governance issue)

10 10 Explanations for Underpricing Asymmetry between Investors as to Firm’s Value Underpricing being the compensation for this uncertainty The more fully informed investors are regarding the firm’s value, the lower will be the underpricing. winner’s curse information acquisition by issuer information cascade

11 11 Winner’s Curse If you are an uniformerd investor and ask for allocation, you will likely be stuck disproportionately with the hard-to-sell offerings. Assume Large informed and many small uninformed investors Capital rationing Large investors get preferential treatment Bid only for successful offerings Small investors full allocation of overpriced IPOs (100%) but only partial allocation of underpriced offerings (50%)

12 12 The Firm $25 0.5 $10

13 13 The Outcome Expected value = 0.5*$25 + 0.5*$10 = $17.50 However if the IPO price is set at $17.50 Small Investor 0.5*0.5*($25-$17.5) +0.5*1.0*($10-$17.5) = -$1.88 IPO set at $15 Small Investor 0.5*0.5*($25-$15) +0.5*1.0*($10-$15) = $0

14 14 Information Acquisition Information acquisition by issuer Book building If bidding (disclosure of demand) will result in higher offer price then issuing firm must offer investor something in return. Empirical support Informed investors receive higher allocation When offer price exceeds the original price range (higher demand let to upward offer price revision), the underpricing is still significantly above average The compensation necessary to induce investors to reveal high demand

15 Role of Underwriter When underwriter is informed Costly to monitor underwriter Underpricing acts to incentive underwriter But – underpricing is same for underwriter IPOs Underpricing substitutes for marketing expenditure But underpricing extreme during internet bubble – when marketing costs low 15

16 16 Cascading Demand Learn a lot from how “excited” other investors are about the IPO Investors follow one another IPO success depends on whether the investor herd is stampeding Ensure success by creating “enthusiasm”

17 Share Allocation Future wealth Underpricing allowed because information gained about increase in post issue value Ownership structure Institutional investors are more informed and preferred – receive preferential allocation – monitoring role Seek blockholders for defensive and monitoring reasons Disperse shareholding entrenches mangement 17

18 18 Empirical Support Information asymmetry Underpricing is lower for IPOs: Where the firm provides more publicly available information With high reputation underwriters Winner’s curse Informed investors preferentially received higher allocation Receive higher allocation of hot issues Information acquisition When offer price exceeds the original price range the underpricing is still significantly above average Information cascades IPOs either undersubscribed or hugely oversubscribe no in-between


Download ppt "1 Capital Raising: Public vs Private Issues Advanced Corporate Finance Semester 1 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google