1. How to Critically Review an Article
April 2012
Singh M
SETPRAS

2. Learning Objectives Understand what a critical review is
Understand the different types of articles
Be able to perform a critical review of a published article

3. Introduction
A critical review involves understanding, evaluating and then analysing all aspects of an article
The structure of an article is broadly similar, although it is worth considering the different types of articles commonly published

4. Introduction Article types: Original research article Review article
This category includes studies and are what most people think of when they talk about a scientific article
Usually up to 3000 words in length
Typically, anywhere from 5-50 references, depending on subject
Review article
This is a comprehensive review on a particular subject. It summarises available evidence and presents information in a balanced way
Usually up to 5000 words in length
Typically, anywhere from reference, depending on subject
Case report
These are short articles that demonstrate an interesting aspect of a case, illustrated by an example
Usually up to 1500 words
Typically, anywhere from 3-10 references

5. Introduction Scientific articles: Most follow same basic pattern:
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(Figures and Tables, if relevant)

6. Critical Appraisal Stages of critical appraisal:
1) Read and re-read the article
2) Understand what was done and why
3) Analyse the results and discussion
4) Ask questions about the information presented

7. Critical Appraisal
Questions to be asking yourself about the article are best structured in the same way as the article
Initially it is best to ask some general questions
Then look at more detail into what they did and how and why

8. Critical Appraisal The Journal 1) What journal was it published in?
2) Why this journal? Is it appropriate for the subject of the article?
3) Is the journal peer-reviewed?
4) What is the journal impact factor?

9. Critical Appraisal The Authors 1) How many authors are there?
2) Are they known for work in this field?
3) Which institution do they work in?
4) What is that institution known for?
5) Does it produce a lot of research publications?

10. Critical Appraisal The Article 1) What kind of article is it?
2) Was the article interesting?
3) Did the article provide new, previously unknown information?
4) Was the article well presented?

11. Critical Appraisal Specific analysis of a scientific article:
Title, Introduction and Abstract:
1) Is the title of the article suitable for what was done?
2) Does the abstract give an accurate summary of the article?
3) Were the aims and objectives of the study clearly outlined?
4) Did the introduction provide enough information as to what has led to this study?
5) Was the study well designed to be able to answer the aims and objectives?

12. Critical Appraisal Materials and Methods:
1) Are the methods used appropriate?
2) Was the population looked at correct?
3) Were interventions randomised?
4) Were there any controls?
5) Are the demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria defined?
6) Were there sufficient numbers to be able to answer the research question?

13. Critical Appraisal Results: 1) Were the results well presented?
2) Were all results provided or were some excluded?
3) Are the results presented in a way to be able to answer the original research questions?
4) Were the results presented in an easy to comprehend way? E.g. figures, tables etc.
5) Are the results valid?

14. Critical Appraisal Statistics:
1) Were the statistical tests used appropriate?
2) Have they performed statistical tests on the correct results?

15. Critical Appraisal Discussion: 1) Were all the results discussed?
2) Were the findings related to the original hypothesis?
3) Were the author’s interpretations of the results correct?
4) Did the authors discuss the drawbacks/limitations of the study?
5) Do you agree with their conclusions?

16. Critical Appraisal References:
1) Were there an appropriate number of references?
2) Were the references up to date?
3) Were the references used appropriately within the article?
4) Have the authors self-referenced?

17. Critical Appraisal Other: 1) Were any conflicts of interest declared?
2) Were any sources of funding declared?

18. Conclusions
When critically reviewing an article there are many questions to be asked
Asking these questions will help provide a better understanding of the article and its results
This is a skill useful at all levels of training
We hope you will consider submitting critical reviews of articles you may have recently read, please see our submissions page for further details

19. Further Information http://www.setpras.org/critical-reviews.html