1. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 13 – Maintenance and Reliability PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e

2. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 2 Orlando Utilities Commission  Maintenance of power generating plants  Every year each plant is taken off-line for 1-3 weeks maintenance  Every three years each plant is taken off-line for 6-8 weeks for complete overhaul and turbine inspection  Each overhaul has 1,800 tasks and requires 72,000 labor hours  OUC performs over 12,000 maintenance tasks each year

3. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 3 Orlando Utilities Commission  Every day a plant is down costs OUC $100,000  Unexpected outages cost between $350,000 and $600,000 per day  Preventive maintenance discovered a cracked rotor blade which could have destroyed a $27 million piece of equipment

4. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 4 Strategic Importance of Maintenance and Reliability  Failure has far reaching effects on a firm’s  Operation  Reputation  Profitability  Dissatisfied customers  Idle employees  Profits becoming losses  Reduced value of investment in plant and equipment

5. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 5 Maintenance and Reliability  The objective of maintenance and reliability is to maintain the capability of the system while controlling costs  Maintenance is all activities involved in keeping a system’s equipment in working order  Reliability is the probability that a machine will function properly for a specified time

6. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 6 Important Tactics  Reliability 1.Improving individual components 2.Providing redundancy  Maintenance 1.Implementing or improving preventive maintenance 2.Increasing repair capability or speed

7. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 7 Strategy and Results Employee Involvement Information sharing Skill training Reward system Power sharing Maintenance and Reliability Procedures Clean and lubricate Monitor and adjust Minor repair Computerize records Results Reduced inventory Improved quality Improved capacity Reputation for quality Continuous improvement Reduced variability Figure 17.1

8. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 8 Reliability Improving individual components R s = R 1 x R 2 x R 3 x … x R n whereR 1 = reliability of component 1 R 2 = reliability of component 2 and so on

9. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 9 Overall System Reliability Reliability of the system (percent) Average reliability of all components (percent) ||||||||| 10099989796 100 100 – 80 80 – 60 60 – 40 40 – 20 20 – 0 0 – n = 10 n = 1 n = 50 n = 100 n = 200 n = 300 n = 400 Figure 17.2

10. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 10 RsRsRsRs R3R3R3R3.99 R2R2R2R2.80 Reliability Example R1R1R1R1.90 Reliability of the process is R s = R 1 x R 2 x R 3 =.90 x.80 x.99 =.713 or 71.3%

11. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 11 Product Failure Rate (FR) Basic unit of measure for reliability FR(%) = x 100% Number of failures Number of units tested FR(N) = Number of failures Number of unit-hours of operating time Mean time between failures MTBF = 1 FR(N)

12. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 12 Failure Rate Example 20 air conditioning units designed for use in NASA space shuttles operated for 1,000 hours One failed after 200 hours and one after 600 hours FR(%) = (100%) = 10% 220 FR(N) = =.000106 failure/unit hr 2 20,000 - 1,200 MTBF = = 9,434 hrs 1.000106

13. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 13 Failure Rate Example 20 air conditioning units designed for use in NASA space shuttles operated for 1,000 hours One failed after 200 hours and one after 600 hours FR(%) = (100%) = 10% 220 FR(N) = =.000106 failure/unit hr 2 20,000 - 1,200 MTBF = = 9,434 hr 1.000106 Failure rate per trip FR = FR(N)(24 hrs)(60 days/trip) FR = (.000106)(24)(60) FR =.152 failures per trip

14. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 14 Providing Redundancy Provide backup components to increase reliability +x Probability of first component working Probability of needing second component Probability of second component working (.8)+(.8)x (1 -.8) =.8 +.16 =.96

15. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 15 Redundancy Example A redundant process is installed to support the earlier example where R s =.713 R1R1R1R10.90 0.90 R2R2R2R20.80 0.80 R3R3R3R30.99 = [.9 +.9(1 -.9)] x [.8 +.8(1 -.8)] x.99 = [.9 + (.9)(.1)] x [.8 + (.8)(.2)] x.99 =.99 x.96 x.99 =.94 Reliability has increased from.713 to.94

16. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 16 Maintenance  Two types of maintenance  Preventive maintenance – routine inspection and servicing to keep facilities in good repair  Breakdown maintenance – emergency or priority repairs on failed equipment

17. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 17 Implementing Preventive Maintenance  Need to know when a system requires service or is likely to fail  High initial failure rates are known as infant mortality  Once a product settles in, MTBF generally follows a normal distribution  Good reporting and record keeping can aid the decision on when preventive maintenance should be performed

18. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 18 Computerized Maintenance System Figure 17.3 Output Reports Inventory and purchasing reports Equipment parts list Equipment history reports Cost analysis (Actual vs. standard) Work orders – –Preventive maintenance – –Scheduled downtime – –Emergency maintenance Data entry – –Work requests – –Purchase requests – –Time reporting – –Contract work Data Files Personnel data with skills, wages, etc. Equipment file with parts list Maintenance and work order schedule Inventory of spare parts Repair history file

19. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 19 Maintenance Costs  The traditional view attempted to balance preventive and breakdown maintenance costs  Typically this approach failed to consider the true total cost of breakdowns  Inventory  Employee morale  Schedule unreliability

20. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 20 Maintenance Costs Figure 17.4 (a) Total costs Breakdown maintenance costs Costs Maintenance commitment Traditional View Preventive maintenance costs Optimal point (lowest cost maintenance policy)

21. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 21 Maintenance Costs Figure 17.4 (b) Costs Maintenance commitment Full Cost View Optimal point (lowest cost maintenance policy) Total costs Full cost of breakdowns Preventive maintenance costs

22. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 22 Maintenance Cost Example Should the firm contract for maintenance on their printers? Number of Breakdowns Number of Months That Breakdowns Occurred 02 18 26 3 4 Total: 20 Total: 20 Average cost of breakdown = $300

23. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 23 Maintenance Cost Example 1.Compute the expected number of breakdowns Number of Breakdowns Frequency Frequency 0 2/20 =.1 2 6/20 =.3 1 8/20 =.4 3 4/20 =.2 ∑ Number of breakdowns Expected number of breakdowns Corresponding frequency =x = (0)(.1) + (1)(.4) + (2)(.3) + (3)(.2) = 1.6 breakdowns per month

24. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 24 Maintenance Cost Example 2.Compute the expected breakdown cost per month with no preventive maintenance Expected breakdown cost Expected number of breakdowns Cost per breakdown =x = (1.6)($300) = $480 per month

25. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 25 Maintenance Cost Example 3.Compute the cost of preventive maintenance Preventive maintenance cost Cost of expected breakdowns if service contract signed Cost of service contract = + = (1 breakdown/month)($300) + $150/month = $450 per month Hire the service firm; it is less expensive

26. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 26 Increasing Repair Capabilities 1.Well-trained personnel 2.Adequate resources 3.Ability to establish repair plan and priorities 4.Ability and authority to do material planning 5.Ability to identify the cause of breakdowns 6.Ability to design ways to extend MTBF

27. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 27 How Maintenance is Performed Figure 17.5 Operator Maintenance department Manufacturer’s field service Depot service (return equipment) Preventive maintenance costs less and is faster the more we move to the left Competence is higher as we move to the right

28. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 28 Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)  Designing machines that are reliable, easy to operate, and easy to maintain  Emphasizing total cost of ownership when purchasing machines so that service and maintenance are included in the cost  Developing preventive maintenance plans that utilize the best practices of operators, maintenance departments, and depot service  Training workers to operate and maintain their own machines

29. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 29 Establishing Maintenance Policies  Simulation  Computer analysis of complex situations  Model maintenance programs before they are implemented  Expert systems  Computers help users identify problems and select course of action

30. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 30 The objective of maintenance is to: Ensure that breakdowns do not affect the quality of products.Ensure that breakdowns do not affect the quality of products. Ensure that no breakdowns will ever occur.Ensure that no breakdowns will ever occur. Ensure that preventive maintenance costs are kept as low as possible.Ensure that preventive maintenance costs are kept as low as possible. Maintain the capability of the system while controlling costs.Maintain the capability of the system while controlling costs.

31. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 31 The probability that a system will function properly for a specified time under stated conditions is referred to as: Maintenance.Maintenance. Reliability.Reliability. Maintainability.Maintainability. Redundancy.Redundancy.

32. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 32 Which is not a reliability tactic for improving reliability and maintenance? Improving individual components.Improving individual components. Providing redundancy.Providing redundancy. Increasing repair capabilities and speed.Increasing repair capabilities and speed.

33. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 33 Which is not a maintenance tactic for improving reliability and maintenance? Improving individual components.Improving individual components. Implementing or improving preventive maintenance.Implementing or improving preventive maintenance. Increasing repair capabilities and speed.Increasing repair capabilities and speed.

34. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 34 MTBF measures the average: Calendar time between failures.Calendar time between failures. Operating time between failures.Operating time between failures. Number of failures per unit time.Number of failures per unit time. Downtime per breakdown.Downtime per breakdown.

35. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 35 Redundancy is achieved by: Improving individual components.Improving individual components. Simplifying the design of components connected in series.Simplifying the design of components connected in series. Improving individual components connected in parallel.Improving individual components connected in parallel. Increasing the number of identical units connected in parallel.Increasing the number of identical units connected in parallel.

36. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 36 System reliability for components connected in series is computed by: Finding the product of individual component probabilities of operating properly.Finding the product of individual component probabilities of operating properly. Finding the sum of individual component probabilities of operating properly.Finding the sum of individual component probabilities of operating properly. Finding the product of individual component probabilities of failing.Finding the product of individual component probabilities of failing. Finding the sum of individual component probabilities of failing.Finding the sum of individual component probabilities of failing.

37. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 37 Redundancy is provided to ensure that: When a component fails, it can be repaired quickly.When a component fails, it can be repaired quickly. When a component fails, it can be repaired economically.When a component fails, it can be repaired economically. When a component fails, it can be repaired fast and at low cost.When a component fails, it can be repaired fast and at low cost. When one component fails, the system has recourse to another.When one component fails, the system has recourse to another.

38. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 38 A maintenance system designed to allow the system to perform is referred to as: Breakdown maintenance.Breakdown maintenance. Infant Mortality.Infant Mortality. Infant survival.Infant survival. Preventive maintenance.Preventive maintenance.

39. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 39 Which characteristics make a system be a candidate for preventive maintenance? When the distribution of MTBF exhibits a small standard deviation.When the distribution of MTBF exhibits a small standard deviation. When the distribution of MTBF exhibits a large standard deviation.When the distribution of MTBF exhibits a large standard deviation. The system had a high infant mortality rate.The system had a high infant mortality rate. The system had a low infant mortality rate.The system had a low infant mortality rate.

40. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 40 As a firm’s maintenance commitment increases: The breakdown maintenance costs increase and the preventive maintenance costs decrease.The breakdown maintenance costs increase and the preventive maintenance costs decrease. Both the breakdown maintenance costs and the preventive maintenance costs increase.Both the breakdown maintenance costs and the preventive maintenance costs increase. The breakdown maintenance costs decrease and the preventive maintenance costs increase.The breakdown maintenance costs decrease and the preventive maintenance costs increase. Both the breakdown maintenance costs and the preventive maintenance costs decrease.Both the breakdown maintenance costs and the preventive maintenance costs decrease.

41. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.17 – 41 TQM concepts combined with maintenance is referred to as: Preventive maintenance.Preventive maintenance. Breakdown maintenance.Breakdown maintenance. Total productive maintenance.Total productive maintenance. Simulation.Simulation. Expert systems.Expert systems.