Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC."— Presentation transcript:

1 Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC

2 Outline Use classic Full Halo, Partial Halo, Limb morphology to determine Earth impact – Need secondary observations to resolve near side - far side ambiguity X-ray flare, X-ray/EUV image, H-alpha image Classic cone model can be used to derive CME parameters needed to drive WSA-Enlil – Need a constraint on CME width – Right now, more than one view is required, but there is hope CME’s seen from the side have longitude ambiguity at least, and are unresolved at worst – Don’t know if Earth will get hit by the CME – Will polarization data resolve this? Is there a preferred angular separation?

3 Limb CME Headed away from Earth Definite miss No geomagnetic storm Partial Halo CME Glancing blow at Earth Probable hit – Harder to predict Weaker, shorter geomagnetic storm Headed directly at the Earth Definite hit Strongest, longest geomagnetic storm Halo CME Classic CME Descriptions

4 longitude radial velocity latitude radius CME ‘Cone’ Geometry CME parameters calculated from analysis of SOHO images Xie et al. 2004 b a h α

5 Latitude (deg)Longitude (deg)Cone ½ Angle (deg) Radial distance (Rs) b9.12.343.214.7 c9.41.326.922.3 d0.70.24.4132.4 e3.81.720.329.0 f20.8-37.883.012.3 Problem: Which ellipse ?

6 Problem: Ellipses are “freeform” – no constraints on eccentricity vs offset Cone ½ Angle = 83 degrees (full Angle 166 !!)

7 Full 3D graphics solution – can only represent ‘correct’ cones originating at the Sun Need to know the cone angle Big problem since cone angle inversely proportional to velocity (roughly)

8 Cone ½ Angle 30 degrees45 degrees60 degrees factor 2 difference in velocity Again: Which ellipse ?

9 What if we only have one Coronagraph ?

10 If only one side view… Answers below vary depending on s/c-Sun- Earth angle – CME latitude is well determined – CME Width and Earthward velocity are usually well determined, though can still be problematic – CME longitude remains ambiguous, if not unknown – Radial propagation is a bad assumption Need to test this – I have the data to do so

11 POS Ambiguity is the difference between a hit and a miss Is it possible to tell the difference Between a Full and partial Halo? A single side view always has problems

12 CME Analysis Tool (CAT)


Download ppt "Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google