We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIsabel Brooks
Modified over 3 years ago
18 March 2004 Colin Milligan funded by
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Workshop Structure Session I Introduction: Interoperability and Reload Session II Content Packages Session III Metadata Session IV SCORM
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Interoperability orig. src: Charles Duncan, Intrallect
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Why we need standards Standards Promote: Persistence –Remember laser disc based materials, Discovery –Beyond your local community Sharing between different systems –For efficiency. Flexibility –Internationalization and Accessibility.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Who makes standards. IMS Working Groups specificationimplementationstandard User Needs New Technology Research review and feedback IEEE CEN/ISSS ISO ADL SCORM (conformance) (certification)
© RELOAD 2003, funded by What do they cover? Metadata Content Packaging Simple Sequencing Learning Design Question and Test Interoperability Digital Repositories Enterprise Accessibility Learner Information Profile Competency (and Portfolios) (Interactive Content)
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Specification Documents Each Spec. has 3 components: –Information Binding XML Binding – how to describe. –Information Model What to describe: definitions, rules and constraints –Best Practice Guide Guidelines for using and implementing. Available from IMS web site for free
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Example: Content Package imsmanifest.xml Metadata Resources
Organization sundialjelsim imsmanifest.xml (how to interpret this package) (how the content is organised) (what resources are needed)
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Why do we need tools? Avoid working directly with XML (files get much more complicated than the one in our example), speed up xml creation. reduce errors, aid conformance (and uptake),
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Where Does RELOAD fit?
© RELOAD 2003, funded by In Practice … CREATE CONTENT PACKAGE & ALTER [RELOAD] STORE [REPOSITORY] DELIVER [MLE]
© RELOAD 2003, funded by RELOAD Tools Reference Implementation –Test, benchmark Visually assemble and manipulate Content Packages –Better than XML View Content Packages –For testing and preview.
(screenshot) details Visual equivalent of imsmanifest.xml files
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Interoperability Demonstration Discover Resources Create CP in RELOAD Upload to LMS
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Future RELOAD stable and feature complete Open Source – others are encouraged to extend, and are doing so Designed to adapt easily if specifications are revised.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Creating CPs with RELOAD 10 minute demo Hands On Further Tasks Round-up
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Hands On: A First CP Core Tasks (p7: Collect Resources Together -p16) –Collect Content –Create Working Directory –Prepare Placeholders –Import Content –Make Organizations –Preview –Rearrange –Add Metadata –Package and Zip
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Advanced tasks Advanced Tasks (p23-25) –Manifests –Dependencies
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Roundup RELOAD allows us to move from Abstract to Physical –Tests (proves) the specification –Links Content Creation and Content Sharing
© RELOAD 2003, funded by 3. Metadata Describes resources: –General (title and keywords) –Lifecycle (versioning) –Metametadata (who wrote the record) –Technical (assisting implementation) –Educational (level) –Rights (copyright and other restrictions) –Relation (to other content) –Annotation (usage metadata) –Classification (in a system)
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Why metadata is important Discovering Resources –Description, educational MD Using Resources –Version control, technical Enforcing Rights Attributing Ownership/Authorship
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Application Profiles Metadata must be interoperable –~80 elements in LOM –Decide on important elements at a local (organisational) level –Use shared vocabulary/taxonomy Kinetics, motion, physics … –Implement Rules and restrictions
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Good Metadata Added by Information Professionals Consistent across a repository Assists Reuse –Usage metadata – recommendation systems like Amazon:
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Hands On Session Take your own content and create content packages. Add Metadata –http://www.cetis.ac.uk/profiles/uklomcore If you dont have any content of your own, get some here. –http://reload.ac.uk/ex/ Aggregate Packages.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Roundup You should have been able to : –Make your content reusable –Describe your content –Aggregate your content with others.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Where next? A repository –JORUM –Merlot, SMETE Federated Search: –Maricopa Learning Exchange –CAREO An LMS –WebCT, BlackBoard, Saba, Teknical
© RELOAD 2003, funded by 4 SCORM SCORM: The Shareable Content Object Reference Model SCORM is real, –Certification (soon), –Now (almost).
© RELOAD 2003, funded by SCORM History US Dept. of Defense, Boeing (AICC) Training Single User Model Drives (pulls) specs forward.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by SCORM Future Close harmonisation with equivalent IMS specs – avoiding divergence. Incorporating Simple Sequencing (1.3 – 2004) Question and Test Interoperability (1.4) Simulations and adaptive learning (v2)
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Hands On Session In addition to CP and MD, SCORM includes support for management of learning (p20 SCORM Elements -22): –Pre-requisites –Max time allowed –Time Limit Action –Data from LMS –Mastery Score
© RELOAD 2003, funded by SCORM Player Allows SCORM functionality preview without using an LMS. –Simple to set up –See what the learner sees –Test functionality. –SingleCourseEx.zip
© RELOAD 2003, funded by The Future RELOAD Editor is stable Others are developing functionality –SCORM 1.3 editor (ADL) –ALOHA Metadata Editor (CanCore) –VDEX Editor (ICBL) Learning Design
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Roundup RELOAD is about enabling –Engage with the standards –Test the standards –Improve the tools.
© RELOAD 2003, funded by Contact Colin Milligan
RELOAD Reusable E-Learning Object Authoring and Delivery Phil Beauvoir Colin Milligan funded by.
Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS an introduction and overview Lisa Corley CETIS Pedagogy.
RELOAD Editor Update Colin Milligan funded by.
Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
Rejuvenating Learning Resources and Working with the JORUM Phil Barker, Engineering Subject Centre & ICBL, Heriot-Watt University. Phil Barker, March 2006.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.
Content and Tools Standards Will Ellis, Head of Digital Learning Resources “We need better digital resources more widely available and more flexible learning.
SCORM Status. 2 Stabilization, Clarification and Issue Resolution Bug Fixes, Corrections & Clarifications SCORM 2004 January 2004 SCORM nd Edition.
Colin Milligan funded by Reload Update: LD is coming.
Meta-data for Video Accessibility Madeleine Rothberg WGBH National Center for Accessible Media SURA/ViDe 6th Annual Digital Video Workshop March 24, 2004.
A sustainable approach to developing e- learning technologies Howard Noble University of Oxford, Learning Technologies Group 16 th June 2004.
Overview of IMS Content Packaging Sheila MacNeill.
Educational Modelling Language (EML): Adding instructional design to existing learning technology specifications Rob Koper
IMS Overview and ePortfolio Specification 3 Nov 2004 Steve Griffin Executive Dir. Int’l Developer and Adopter Support, Co-Founder IMS Global Learning Consortium.
Wednesday, October 22, E-Learning Objects: The Value of SCORM and MPEG-7 Packaging for Digital Media Assets TRACK 3: TEACHING AND LEARNING Thursday,
Learning Technology Standards A Layperson's Guide to Who s Who and What s What Updated November 25, 2002 by Jonathan Dean Oracle iLearning Product Management.
A centre of expertise in digital information management IMS Digital Repositories Interoperability Andy Powell UKOLN,
Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.
E-Learning and the Digital Library A Report on Collaboration between IMS and OKI 2002 CNI Fall Task Force Meeting Steve Griffin, COO & co-founder IMS Jeff.
Workshop on Educational resources for 21st century Schools Jordi Vivancos CITE Symposium March 2010.
Content generation tools © Wawasan Open University 2010 OER Capacity Building Workshop by Wawasan Open University is licensed under a Creative Commons.
IMS Content Packaging Overview Dec 5, IMS Content Packaging scope Source: IMS Info Model document Fig. 2.1.
E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.
SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.
Intrallect and intraLibrary Charles Duncan
Trends & Issues: Breakout Session Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.
THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE Paul Jesukiewicz Director, ADL Co-Lab February 16, 2004.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
RELOAD Overview Bill Olivier Bolton Institute. RELOAD Aims Standards-based Editor and Runtime toolset –Metadata –Content Packaging –SCORM (& ideally Simple.
LCMS: What is thriving the Dutch, hype or need? Jocelyn Manderveld Educational Technology Expertise Centre Open University of the Netherlands.
Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.
Publishing Digital Content to a LOR Publishing Digital Content to a LOR 1.
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
Patricia Ploetz, ABD Academic ADL Co-Lab University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Canadian Association for Distance Education Wise And Witty Weekday Presentation.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
Europortfolio Europass CV ePortfolio interop IMS ePortfolio Interoperability (ZIP IMS eP CP Import/Export) Model based on Europass CV Application Profile.
Third meeting of the Valkenburg Group Informal network of EML implementers and developers. Established following the “Developing an EML Authoring and.
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards Bill Olivier Director, CETIS.
University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.
Learning Technology Standards Committee IEEE 1484 (some nouns) Chad J. Kainz Senior Director, NSIT Academic Technologies, University of Chicago Vice-Chair,
IMS Developer Briefing ECC Singapore ADL BlackBoard FD Learning DEST.
Susan Eales Programme Manager Exchange for Learning (X4L)
EDEN 2007 Naples, Italy LIFELONG LEARNING TEACHERS’ NEEDS IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Josep Maria Boneu 1, Maria Galofré 2, Julià Minguillón 2 1 Centre.
1 Survey of Profiles from Other Domains XMSF Profile SG 13 January 2004 Curt Blais and NPS MV3250 (Introduction to XML, 1st Quarter 2005) Katherine L.
Learning Technology Workshop Vice-Chair, Frans Van Assche Strategy Manager European Schoolnet 25th February 2004.
PORTFOLIO CD COVER examples IMS Portfolio Workshop Spring 2012.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.