Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Search for dark forces in nuclear transitions

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Search for dark forces in nuclear transitions"— Presentation transcript:

1 Search for dark forces in nuclear transitions
A.J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatlós, L. Csige, Z. Gácsi, J. Gulyás, M. Hunyadi, T.J. Ketel, A. Krasznahorkay, I. Kuti, B.M. Nyakó, L. Stuhl, J. Timár, T.G. Tornyi, Zs. Vajta

2

3 Light and dark: ideas for new physics in O(1-100 MeV)

4 https://sites.google.com/site/zprimeguide/
Hye-Sung Lee (JLAB)

5 Explanation of the g-2 anomaly by introducing a light particle (dark photon, or dark Z’)

6 Planned Experiments worldwide

7 e+-e⁻ internal pair creation
M.E. Rose Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 678 E.K. Warburton Phys. Rev. B133 (1964) 1368. P. Schlüter, G. Soff, W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 75 (1981) 327.

8 Creation and decay of a boson
Ji e+ Ji e–

9 Study the 8Be M1 transitions with better conditions than before
18.2 1+ T=0 Ep= 1030 keV Excitation with the 7Li(p,γ)8Be reaction 17.6 1+ T=1 Ep= 441 keV 3.0 2+ 0+ 8Be

10 A Compact Positron Electron spectrometer (COPE) for internal pair creation studies (ENSAR support)
B COPE 100:1 ATLAS µ-TPC technology for particle tracking, DSP cards for readout.

11 An e+ - e- spectrometer constructed by using the central tracker (MWPC) detectors of COPE and plastic scintillator telescopes

12 The completed spectrometer

13 γ-ray spectra measured on the two resonances and from (p,p’)

14 Ee+ + Ee- sum energy spectra and angular correlations
Can it be some artificial effect caused by γ-rays? No, since we observed it at Ep= 1.1 MeV but not at MeV. Can it be some nuclear physics effect? Let’s investigate that at different bombarding energies!

15 γ-background of the spectrometer

16 On-resonance measurements Ep=1.04 MeV Ep=1.10 MeV
Deviation from IPC

17 Off-resonance measurement
No deviation

18 IPC angular correlations Can we reproduce the peak at 140 degree by any combinations of the multipolarities 8Be Jπ Ex (MeV) Γ (MeV) + tail of the GDR No, it is not possible!!!

19 Can it be some kind of interference effect between transitions with different multipolarities?
Most probably not. In case of any interference the peak should behave differently. The maximal deviation should be at off resonance (at about 1/2Γ off), but we observed it on resonance!!!

20 What is the significance of the peak?
E1+M1 simulated background: fitted with Minuit minimization (red line) between 60˚ - 130˚ Integrals in 130˚ - 160˚: Background: 2009 counts Signal+Background: 2320 counts → peak significance: 6.8 σ (p-value: 5.6x10-12) (Glen Cowan: Statistical Data Analysis, 1998, Oxford Press)

21 How can we understand the peak like deviation
How can we understand the peak like deviation? Fitting the angular correlations Experimental angular e+e− pair correlations measured in the 7Li(p,e+e−) reaction at Ep=1.10 MeV with -0.5< y <0.5 (closed circles) and |y|>0.5 (open circles). The results of simulations of boson decay pairs added to those of IPC pairs are shown for different boson masses.

22 Determination of the mass of the new particle
Determination of the mass of the new particle by the Χ2/f method, by comparing the experimental data with the results of the simulations obtained for different particle masses. Invariant mass distribution plot for the electron-positron pairs

23 The coupling constant Our results is within the predicted band calculated from the muon g-2.

24 Who else investigated it?
Many articles from F.W.N. de Boer for the IPC of the above 8Be transitions, but their maximal correlation angle was 131 degree only. Just below the 140 degree peak… Our results agrees well with his data below 130 degree.

25

26 The most recent article…

27

28 Did we calculate the coupling constant properly
Did we calculate the coupling constant properly? Nuclear deexcitations via Z’ emission Nuclear deexciations via axions (T.W. Donnelli et al., Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 1607.)  the coupling constant can be times smaller  it is not ruled out! It is still a viable explanation!

29 Conclusions The observed deviation between the experimental and theoretical angular correlations is significant and can be described by assuming the creation and subsequent decay of a boson with mass m0c2 =16.70±0.35(stat)±0.5(sys) MeV. The branching ratio of the e+e− decay of such a boson to the γ decay of the MeV level of 8Be is found to be 5.8 × 10−6 for the best fit. Such a boson might be a good candidate for the relatively light U(1)d gauge boson , or the light mediator of the secluded WIMP dark matter scenario or the dark Z (Zd) suggested for explaining the muon anomalous magnetic moment. With the most recent data, it is practically excluded now in the popular dark photon model, however alternative models based on a new dark leptonic gauge boson is prosed. The lifetime of the boson with the observed coupling strength is expected to be in the order of 10−14 s. This gives a flight distance of about 30 μm in the present experiment, and would imply a very sharp resonance (Γ~ 0.07 eV) in the future e+e− scattering experiments.


Download ppt "Search for dark forces in nuclear transitions"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google