1. Untouchable?: A Canadian Perspective on the Anti- Spam Battle Michael Geist Canada Research Chair in Internet & E- commerce Law University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law October 2004

2. 2 The Spam Myths >spam originates offshore >the delete key >the private sector >law is powerless >canadian anti-spam legislation

3. 3 Outline >The spam problem >Three Phases of Dealing With Spam Phase One - Spam as an Annoyance Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars Phase Three - Getting Serious About Spam

4. 4 Spam Growth >Estimated Cost - $10 - 87 Billion/year >70% of email now spam >90% of S. Korean email now spam >AOL - Blocking over 2 billion spam per day >75% of spam now uses HTML >Profitability at response rate under 0.0001% >Brightmail estimates $250 million in profitability for spammers in 2003

5. 5 Canadian Spam >10 of the 200 spammers worldwide (Spamhaus ROKSO list) are Canadian >Top 200 spammers responsible for 90% of global spam >Sophos ranks Canada as top ten source of spam worldwide

6. 6 The Spam Problem >Cost shifting >Privacy >Intermediary effects >Deception and fraud >Lost e-commerce confidence >Lost e-communication confidence

7. 7 Phase One - Spam as an Annoyance >1995 - 1999 >Anti-spam groups form >Sporadic legislative initiatives but emphasis on private sector leadership >Private sector legal tactics Contract Criminal Trademark Trespass >Private sector technical tactics - MAPS RBL, UDP >Public sector enforcement - FTC brings first action in 1998 >Spammers fight back with own suits

8. 8 Phase One - Spam as an Annoyance The federal government believes that its current policy and legal frameworks will continue to foster strong Internet growth and development in Canada while at the same time dealing adequately with computer abuse and criminal activity. Spam is but one of the new elements emerging from increased Internet growth and development. The government believes that an appropriate mix of policies and laws, consumer awareness, responsible Internet industry stakeholders and technological solutions is the best and most appropriate way to deal with behaviour in the new and evolving on-line environment. The government believes that Canada has this right mix today but will continue to monitor developments and consider changes if they are required. - Industry Canada, 1999

9. 9 Phase One - Spam as an Annoyance >Problem -- doesn’t work Spam continues grow Isolated private sector actions have limited deterrence value and are expensive Inconsistent legislative proposals

10. 10 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >2000 - 2003 >Spam problem worsens >Focus shifts to three pillars Technology Education Legal Solutions

11. 11 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Technology Filters Authentication >Problems: Cost False Positives (Solution worse than the problem) Privacy Spammer technological response

12. 12 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Education Educate businesses via industry codes Educate consumers on how to respond to spam >Problems: Lack of legal weight to codes Bad actors Inconsistent consumer messaging - opt-in vs. opt-out

13. 13 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Legal Solutions Global shift toward anti-spam legislation including US, Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Australia >Key provisions o Definitional issues o Private rights of action o Significant damages o Labeling requirements o Deceptive practices (headers, spoofing, etc.) o Email harvesting/Dictionary attacks o ISP immunity o Opt-out vs. opt-in o Do-not-spam lists o Commissioning spam

14. 14 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Legal Solutions - Canada >Consider prospect for anti-spam legislation in 2003 >Focus on four main legislative solutions PIPEDA Criminal Code Competition Bureau, Fair Practices Branch Telecommunications Act

15. 15 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >PIPEDA Email addresses as personally identifiable information Respecting opt-outs Harvesting email addresses Accountability Security

16. 16 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Competition Act Sections 51(1) and 74.01 - false or misleading representations for purpose of promoting product or service Significant fines >Could target: False or deceptive headers Content of certain email >FTC focused on deceptive practice legislation

17. 17 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Criminal Code Section 380 -- fraud Section 372(1) -- false messages Section 342.1 -- fraudulently obtain computer service Section 342.2 -- device for committing 342.1 >Could cover -- Fraudulent spam Unauthorized use of email servers Email harvesting Email harvesting software

18. 18 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Telecommunications Act Section 41 -- CRTC order prohibiting unsolicited communications No action yet from CRTC but theoretically section appears to cover spam

19. 19 Phase Two - The Three Anti-Spam Pillars >Problems Enforcement challenges Ineffective legislation Unnecessary legislation?

20. 20 Phase Three - Getting Serious About Spam >2004 - ?? >Anti-spam activity is an enforcement problem… NOT a legal or technological problem

21. 21 Phase Three - Getting Serious About Spam >The spam problem will get worse if nothing is done Less email communication Less e-commerce More wireless spam More IM spam (spim) More phishing

22. 22 Phase Three - Getting Serious About Spam >Resourcing anti-spam efforts >Follow the money >National anti-spam actions Canadian-specific action plan >Multinational enforcement co-operation Australia - S. Korea model Operation Secure Your Server >International organizations ITU WSIS OECD >Contemplating legislative alternatives

23. 23 Untouchable?

24. 24 What are we prepared to do?

25. 25 Michael Geist mgeist@pobox.com