1. ANALYSIS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES OF EXERCISE 1 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TT BENCHMARK 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Bedirhan Akdeniz and Kostadin Ivanov Pennsylvania State University OECD/NRC Boiling Water Reactor Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark

2. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark OUTLINE 2002 ANS Winter Meeting.Introduction.Objectives and Definitions.Performed Studies - Steady State Results - Transient Results - Sensitivity Studies Results.Conclusions

3. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark INTRODUCTION  Recent progress in computer technology has made development of coupled system thermal-hydraulic and neutron kinetics code systems feasible.  The OECD/NRC BWR Turbine Trip Benchmark has attracted the participation of a significant number of companies and organizations from different countries  Benchmark team of PSU is responsible for authoring the specifications, coordinating the benchmark activities, answering participant questions, analyzing the solutions submitted by participants, providing reports and summarizing the results for each phase of the benchmark 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

4. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark OBJECTIVES and DEFINITIONS BWR Turbine Trip: - Begins with a sudden turbine stop valve closure and simulates the turbine trip transient - Coupling between core phenomena and system dynamics plays an important role - Available real plant experimental data makes this benchmark problem very valuable 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

5. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark OBJECTIVES and DEFINITIONS Purpose of Exercise 1: - to test the system thermal- hydraulics with fixed axial power profile - to initialise the participants’ system models TRAC-BF1: - Transient Reactor Analysis Code - An advanced best-estimate computer program for BWR accident analysis 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

6. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES  TRAC-BF1 model was developed for PBTT  After being sure that the model is reflecting the PBTT characteristics, steady state and transient studies were performed  The results were compared with RETRAN results and available measured dome pressure data  Sensitivity studies were performed for steam bypass flow and core by pass flow. 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

7. 1- SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 2- STEADY STATE  Core Inlet Enthalpy  Core Axial Pressure Drop  Core Average Axial Void Fraction Distribution 3- TIME HISTORIES  Dome Pressure  Core Exit Pressure  Total Jet Pump flow  Turbine Bypass Flow 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark REQUESTED OUTPUTS

8. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES TRAC-BF1 Steady State Results  Steady state pressure drop, core inlet enthalpy and core average void fraction distribution are callculated as follows: TRAC-BF1RETRAN T in = 274.1 C P in = 6972 kPa At the above conditions, h inlet = 1205.9 kj/kg T in = 274.5 C P in = 6972 kPa At the above conditions, h inlet = 1209.1 kJ/kg P. Drop: 137.1 kPaP. Drop: 137.8 kPa Inlet Enthalpy: 1209.1 kJ/kg Pressure Drop: 137.6 kPa Plant Reference Parameters: 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

9. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES TRAC-BF1 Steady State Results 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

10. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES TRAC-BF1 Transient Results 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

11. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES TRAC-BF1 Transient Results 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

12. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES TRAC-BF1 Transient Results 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

13. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES SEQUENCE of EVENTS TRAC-BF1RETRANMEASURED TSVC 0.0900.0960.090 BVBO 0.0600.0720.078 BFO 0.846 0.840 DPIR 0.4500.432 CEPIR 0.4920.486 TSVC : Turbine Stop Valve Closed BVBO : Bypass Valve Begins Opening BFO : Bypass Full Open DPIR : Dome Pressure Initial Response CEPIR : Core Exit Pressure Initial Response 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

14. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES SENSITIVITY STUDIES 2002 ANS Winter Meeting In order to determine the jet pump behavior correctly sensitivity study was performed for pressure drop characterisics Different number of channels were used to test the system thermal- hydraulics. Although few of them is sufficient to simulate the Exercise 1, 33 core channels were used because of the Exercise 2 and 3. Main steam bypass flow modeling was performed Core bypass flow modeling was performed. In this presentation main steam bypass flow and core bypass flow sensitivity results will ve presented.

15. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES SENSITIVITY STUDIES 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Main Steam Bypass Flow Modeling: Accurate modeling of the steam bypass system is going to assure that the dynamic response of system pressure is well predicted. important issues are: - obtaining the steam bypass characteristics - an accurate geometric representation

16. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES MAIN STEAM BYPASS FLOW SENSITIVITY STUDY 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

17. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES CORE BYPASS FLOW SENSITIVITY STUDIES 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Bypass Channel Modellng: Additional 2 bypass channels added to 33 core channels in order to represent core bypass flow. TRAC-BF1 1-Dimensional Vessel Model Leak Path Flow Modeling: Instead of additional bypass channels TRAC-BF1 allows user to define leakage flow from channel to vessel component.

18. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES CORE BYPASS FLOW SENSITIVITY STUDIES 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Steady State Core Bypass Flow Sensitivity Results Flow Rates Bypass Channel Model (kg/s) Leak Path Model (kg/s) RETRAN (kg/s) Total Core 104451103110445 Channels 960395309603 Bypass 8421501842

19. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark PERFORMED STUDIES CORE BYPASS FLOW SENSITIVITY STUDIES 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

20. Peach Bottom 2 Turbine Trip Benchmark CONCLUSIONS For both steady state and transient simulations, TRAC- BF1 results are in very good agreement with measured data and RETRAN predictions. The Results from sensitivity studies are helpful to analyze participants’ results for the 1 st Benchmark Exercise. It is also verified that TRAC-BF1 can represent the system thermalhydraulics at both steady state and transient conditions. 2002 ANS Winter Meeting

21. T H A N K Y O U OECD/NRC Boiling Water Reactor Turbine Trip Benchmark Bedirhan Akdeniz and Kostadin N. Ivanov The Pennsylvania State University 2002 ANS Winter Meeting