Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAllison Gill Modified over 3 years ago

1
Array di microfoni A. Farina, A. Capra

2
SPEAKERS ARRAYS FOR A PHYSICAL MODELLING PIANO 3D Techniques: Wave Field Synthesis Beam Forming CrossTalk Cancellation GOAL: the 3D sound of a realgrancoda piano

3
Spatialization Effects (1/4) 1.Stereo: Is the reference technique. 2. Recursive Ambiophonic Crosstalk Elimination (RACE): -Cancellation of the signal coming from the R speaker and arriving to the Left ear using, in the L speaker, a copy of that signal with a proper delay and a proper attenuation -The cancellation signal arrives to the Right ear: it needs to be cancelled with another copy coming from the R speaker… -… … and so on

4
3. Beam Forming: 2 plane waves from +30° and -30°. 30° Spatialization Effects (2/4) Speaker arrays generate sound fields simulating sound sources placed to a finite or infinite distance. This effect is created by means of different gains and delays.

5
4. Convolution with real IRs : -Points of percussion: F#1, G#3, C6, F#7. Spatialization Effects (3/4) 5. Gains and delays : -4 point sources placed at a fixed distance from the listener. -Calculation of the delay from source to speaker.

6
Piano recording in anechoic room Impulse Responses of the sound board

7
Neumann stereo mics Neumann Dummy Head Eigenmike® 31 Bruel&Kjaer microphones

8
MICROPHONE ARRAYS: TYPES AND PROCESSING Linear Array Planar Array Spherical Array Processing Algorithm

9
General Approach Whatever theory or method is chosen, we always start with M microphones, providing M signals x m, and we derive from them V signals y v And, in any case, each of these V outputs can be expressed by: processor M inputs V outputs

10
Traditional approaches The processing filters h m,v are usually computed following one of several, complex mathematical theories, based on the solution of the wave equation (often under certaing simplifications), and assuming that the microphones are ideal and identical In some implementations, the signal of each microphone is processed through a digital filter for compensating its deviation, at the expense of heavier computational load

11
Traditional Spherical Harmonics approach Spherical Harmonics (H.O.Ambisonics) Virtual microphones A fixed number of intermediate virtual microphones is computed, then the dynamically-positioned virtual microphones are obtained by linear combination of these intermediate signals.

12
Novel approach No theory is assumed: the set of h m,v filters are derived directly from a set of impulse response measurements, designed according to a least-squares principle. In practice, a matrix of impulse responses is measured, and the matrix has to be numerically inverted (usually employing some regularization technique). This way, the outputs of the microphone array are maximally close to the ideal responses prescribed This method also inherently corrects for transducer deviations and acoustical artifacts (shielding, diffractions, reflections, etc.)

13
The microphone array impulse responses c m,d, are measured for a number of D incoming directions. We get a matrix C of measured impulse responses for a large number P of directions m=1…M mikes d=1…D sources c ki Novel approach

14
The virtual microphone which we want to synthesize must be specified in the same D directions where the impulse responses had been measured. Lets choose a high-order cardioid of order n as our target virtual microphone. This is just a direction-dependent gain. The theoretical impulse response coming from each of the D directions is: Target Directivity

15
Novel approach m = 1…M microphones d = 1…D directions Applying the filter matrix H to the measured impulse responses C, the system should behave as a virtual microphone with wanted directivity h 1 (t) h 2 (t) h M (t) p d (t) Target function c 1,d (t) A M,v δ(t) A 1,v δ(t) A 2,v δ(t) But in practice the result of the filtering will never be exactly equal to the prescribed functions p d ….. c 2,d (t) c M,d (t)

16
Novel approach We go now to frequency domain, where convolution becomes simple multiplication at every frequency k, by taking an N-point FFT of all those impulse responses: We now try to invert this linear equation system at every frequency k, and for every virtual microphone v: This over-determined system doesn't admit an exact solution, but it is possible to find an approximated solution with the Least Squares method

17
Least-squares solution We compare the results of the numerical inversion with the theoretical response of our target microphones for all the D directions, properly delayed, and sum the squared deviations for defining a total error: The inversion of this matrix system is now performed adding a regularization parameter, in such a way to minimize the total error (Nelson/Kirkeby approach): It revealed to be advantageous to employ a frequency-dependent regularization parameter k. P

18
Spectral shape of the regularization parameter k At very low and very high frequencies it is advisable to increase the value of. H L

19
It is possible to compute just once the following term: Then, whenever a new set filters is required, this is generated simply applying to R the gains Q of the target microphone: FIR filters realtime synthesis algorithm: Thanks to Hermitian symmetry properties, a real-FFT algorithm can be employed Real-time synthesis of the filters h Time-domain windowing [R k ] MxD [Q k ] DxV [H k ] MxV [h n ] MxV N-point real-IFFT

20
Critical aspects LOW frequencies: wavelength longer than array width - no phase difference between mikes - local approach provide low spatial resolution (single, large lobe) - global approach simply fails (the linear system becomes singular) MID frequencies: wavelength comparable with array width -with local approach secondary lobes arise in spherical or plane wave detection (negligible if the total bandwidth is sufficiently wide) - the global approach works fine, suppressing the side lobes, and providing a narrow spot. HIGH frequencies: wavelength is shorter than twice the average mike spacing (Nyquist limit) - spatial undersampling - spatial aliasing effects – random disposition of microphones can help the local approach to still provide some meaningful result - the global approach fails again

21
Linear array 16 omnidirectional mikes mounted on a 1.2m aluminium beam, with exponential spacing 16 channels acquisition system: 2 Behringer A/D converters + RME Hammerfall digital sound card Sound recording with Adobe Audition Filter calculation, off-line processing and visualization with Aurora plugins

22
Linear array - calibration The array was mounted on a rotating table, outdoor A Mackie HR24 loudspeaker was used A set of 72 impulse responses was measured employing Aurora plugins under Adobe Audition (log sweep method) - the sound card controls the rotating table. The inverse filters were designed with the local approach (separate inversion of the 16 on-axis responses, employing Auroras Kirkeby4 plugin)

23
Linear array - polar plots

24
Linear array - practical usage The array was mounted on an X-Y scanning apparatus a Polytec laser vibrometer is mounted along the array The system is used for mapping the velocity and sound pressure along a thin board of resonance wood (Abete della val di Fiemme, the wood employed for building high-quality musical instruments) A National Instruments board controls the step motors through a Labview interface The system is currently in usage at IVALSA (CNR laboratory on wood, San Michele allAdige, Trento, Italy)

25
Linear array - practical usage The wood panel is excited by a small piezoelectric transducer When scanning a wood panel, two types of results are obtained: A spatially-averaged spectrum of either radiated pressure, vibration velocity, or of their product (which provides an estimate of the radiated sound power) A colour map of the radiated pressure or of the vibration velocity at each resonance frequency of the board

26
Linear array - test results (small loudspeaker)

27
Linear array - test results (rectangular wood panel) SPL (dB)velocity (m/s)SPL (dB)velocity (m/s)

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google