1. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project San Francisco October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

2. San Francisco Co-Sponsors Bay View Hunters Point Community Advocates & Local Contractors Association Board of Supervisors City & County of San Francisco Environmental Policy Center Presidio Trust San Francisco Chamber of Commerce San Francisco Municipal Railway California Center for Land Recycling San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association Transportation Choices Forum Transportation for a Livable City Visitacion Valley Planning Alliance Special thanks to the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Urban Land Institute, and San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association for providing food and refreshments for today’s event.

3. SMART GROWTH STRATEGY Regional Agencies Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) SPONSORING AGENCIES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

4. REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development 45 Member Organizations Steering Committee consists of organizations representing the Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development: Government: Association of Bay Area Governments SPONSORING AGENCIES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Prosperous Economy: Bay Area Council Quality Environment: Sierra Club Social Equity: Urban Habitat Program

5. 1 million new jobs 1 million more people 265,000 daily in-commuters to the region 150% increase in aggregate traffic congestion Conversion of up to 83,000 acres of currently undeveloped land 44% decrease in households able to afford the median priced home from 1995 to 2001 CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES BAY AREA TRENDS SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Through 2020 1995 to 2001

6. Natural Increase (“Our own children”) Net Migration (“Other People”) CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES REGIONAL POPULATION GROWTH 50% (approximate figures) SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

7. Expand housing? Constrain future job growth? Expand infrastructure to handle in-commuters? Find a smarter way to grow CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES CHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTH SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

8. PHILOSOPHY Broad participation Bottom-up Build on local efforts CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

9. LOCAL EFFORTS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Better Neighborhoods 2002

10. Smart growth land use changes supported by local governments. A regional incentive package and implementation strategies. A set of smart growth land use projections.GOALSCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

11. The Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development: SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Prosperous Economy Quality Environment Social Equity

12. Efficiently accommodate projected growth. Provide sufficient affordable housing. Revitalize central cities and older suburbs. Reduce single occupant vehicle trips. Preserve open space and agricultural land. Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement. SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

13. Revitalization of existing communities. Development near transit service. Mixed incomes. Mixed use. Efficient density. Efficient design for edge development. SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

14. PROCESS Public Workshop Round 1 September and October 2001 Distillation and Analysis Public Workshop Round 2 March and April 2001 Final Steps CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

15. Smart growth principles Land use mapping exercise Regulatory changes and incentives PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

16. HOUSING UNITS.................... JOBS............................... PROXIMITY OF HSG. TO TRANSIT..... PROXIMITY OF JOBS TO TRANSIT..... OPEN SPACE........................ PEDESTRIAN QUALITY............... PLACES: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GIS PLACE 3 S: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GIS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT WATER CONSUMPTION..............

17. Three regionwide thematic alternatives Analysis of alternatives and existing trends: DISTILLATION & ANALYSIS –Housing Affordability –Jobs/Housing Match –Market Displacement and Social Equity –Transportation and Air Quality Modeling –Development Feasibility CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

18. Review results of first workshop. Address subregional issues. Recommend preferred alternative. Develop regulatory changes and incentives. PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND TWO CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

19. BAASD coordinates a Public Education and Engagement Campaign ABAG Board considers adoption of Projections forecast MTC’s Regional Transportation Plan Other regional plans Regional regulatory changes and incentives Local implementation FINAL STEPS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

20. General Plans – –Revised Regulatory Framework – –Additional Incentives – –Regional Context Housing Allocations RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROCESSES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

21. RELATIONSHIP TO DRAFT COMPACT CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

22. Housing Availability and Affordability Traffic Mobility and Congestion Open Space and Preservation Livability and Community Vitality Social and Economic Equity OUR REGIONAL GROWTH CHALLENGES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

23. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Bay Area Jobs and Employed Residents by County, 2000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma Total Jobs Total Employed Residents CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

24. Projected Growth in Jobs and Employed Residents 2000-2020 - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Jobs Employed Residents CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma

25. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY The jobs/housing challenge 2000-2020 Projected job growth: 100,000 jobs Resulting housing need: 20,000-70,000 units CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

26. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Increased Housing Supply Can Help... Maintain the City’s diversity Maintain housing supply for middle class Minimize the gap between housing and jobs CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

27. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Affordability Gap for Median-Income Households - $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Contra Costa / Alameda San Francisco/ San Mateo/Marin Santa Clara County Sonoma County Solano/Napa Home Price Affordable to Median 4 Person Household Median Home Market Price CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

28. INCOME CATEGORIES FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR Median Income - $80,100 VERY LOW INCOME 0-$40,050 — Child Care Worker$17,860 — Medical Assistant$28,130 — Retail Clerk $20,360 LOW INCOME $40,050-$64,080 — Accountant $48,740 — Elementary School Teacher$41,280 MODERATE INCOME $64,080-$96,120 — Computer Programmer $70,190 HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT — Police Patrol Office$49,220

29. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Housing need by affordability category: Very low income: 26% Low income: 10% Moderate income: 28% Above moderate income: 36% CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

30. South Beach Marina HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

31. Portsid e HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

32. Turk and 111 Jones Affordable Housing HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

33. Parkview Commons Affordable Housing HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

34. In-Law Unit HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

35. 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 Vehicle-Hours of Delay 150% Increase 2025 339,100 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% VMT Increasing Faster Than Population 2000-2020 VMT Increase Population Increase 14% 28 % 1998 TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 854,600 100,000 300,000 500,000 700,000 900,000

36. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 19902020 Commute Mode Split Remains Unchanged (millions of trips/day) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19902020 In-Commuters to Bay Area Increase (thousands of persons/year) Cars Transit Walk, bike TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

37. Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Year 6,455 4,779 10,591 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Urban Center Traditional Neighborhood Suburban Neighborhood TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT (San Francisco) (Rockridge)(San Ramon)

38. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION

39. South Beach Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

40. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 16th Street BART Community Design Plan

41. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 3rd Street MUNI Light Rail Extension

42. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 3rd Street

43. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Caltrain Extension

44. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Transbay Terminal Improvement Plan SMWM

45. OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT The Presidio

46. Land has been urbanized 2 1/2 times faster than urban population has increased Urban Population OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Urbanized Land Population (millions) Urbanized Land (square miles) 100 200 300 400 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 Urban Population Urbanized Land Population (millions) Urbanized Land (square miles) 100 200 300 400 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 70 13,000 150 60,000 1950 1990 Source: National Geographic

47. Projected for Development Through 2020 Public Land or Privately Protected Land Conservation Easement Owned in Fee Urban Areas OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Lands Projected for Development through 2020 83,000 acres subject to conversion

48. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

49. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

50. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

51. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY The Bay Area’s 46 Most Impoverished Neighborhoods (NCCC 1997) Very low-income neighborhoods need reinvestment while minimizing displacement These neighborhood residents need access to quality jobs CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

52. Definition of Impoverished Community: Areas where a majority of households earn less than 80% of the County median income (1990) SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Impoverished Communities In San Francisco

53. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 39% 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Bayview-Hunter’s Point San Francisco Lower Labor Force Participation

54. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY Bayview-Hunter’s Point Impoverishment = An Under-served Community: Limited employment opportunities near housing Fewer licensed child care facilities No grocery stores Fewer Parks CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

55. Impoverished neighborhoods: Can benefit from Smart Growth May be significantly affected by Smart Growth SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

56. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project San Francisco October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

57. SMALL GROUP EXERCISE GOAL Identify the most appropriate patterns for smart growth in San Francisco. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

58. SMALL GROUP EXERCISE Smart Growth Principles Land Use Mapping Exercise Affordable Housing Regulatory Changes and Incentives CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

59. PRINCIPLESCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Review principles generated this morning. Add additional principles if desired.

60. MAPPING EXERCISE Planning Areas Planning Area Categories Place Types Predictors CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

61. PLANNING AREAS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Areas where development might be possible Not an endorsement of new development

62. PLANNING AREA CATEGORIES Key Sites Residential Areas Mixed-Use Areas Town Centers/Downtowns Employment Areas/Institutions Rail Stations/Major Transfer Facility Areas Corridors CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

63. PLACE TYPES MENU CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

64. PLACE TYPE MANUAL CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

65. PLACE TYPES Varying mixes of residential and employment uses: CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Residential Mixed-Use Town Center/Downtown Employment Center/Institution

66. Marina DistrictRESIDENTIALCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

67. Lakesid eRESIDENTIALCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

68. Yerba Buena GardensMIXED-USECONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

69. MIXED USE SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT West Portal

70. TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN Financial District CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

71. TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN Haight-Ashbury CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

72. EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION Fisherman’s Wharf CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

73. EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT San Francisco State

74. Varying land uses and densities within each Place Type Specify percentage of planning area to be changed Focus on the next 20 years PLACE TYPE CHARACTERISTICS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

75. OTHER PLANNING AREA ASSIGNMENTS No Change (includes open space) New Place Type Percent Increase CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

76. Broad brush, regional perspective County-wide interactionAPPROACHCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

77. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT PLACE TYPE EXERCISE

78. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

79. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

80. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

81. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

82. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

83. AFFORDABLE HOUSING MIX Assign affordability mix to each planning area: CategoryDefault Very Low Income26% Low Income10% Moderate Income28% Above Moderate Income36% CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

84. Fiscal Reform Monetary Incentives to Local Governments Regulatory Exemptions Transportation Improvements and Policies Monetary Incentives for Individuals REGULATORY CHANGES AND INCENTIVES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

85. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project San Francisco October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT