Presentation on theme: "Workshop 4: Il late-presenter Moderatori: G. Ippolito, M. Moroni Discussant: R. Iardino Risposta virologico-clinica e scelta della terapia C. Mussini."— Presentation transcript:
Workshop 4: Il late-presenter Moderatori: G. Ippolito, M. Moroni Discussant: R. Iardino Risposta virologico-clinica e scelta della terapia C. Mussini
760 pazienti/ 125 morti (16%)
Kaplan Meier plot showing the cumulative proportion of patients with clinical progression, according to the type of AIDS diagnosis that was present at the time of HIV diagnosis
Prognosis of late presenters Adapted from Sterne et al. CROI 2009, Abstract 525 and presentation Based on 24,444 patients from 15 cohort studies 808 deaths and 2366 events in 81,071 person-years of follow-up 0 – – – Probability of death Years since start of HAART 251 – – – 550 Years since start of cART Probability of AIDS or death
EFV vs LPV/RTV in Tx-Naive Pts With CD4+ < 200 in Mexico HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 Madero JS, et al. IAC Abstract TUAB Week Efavirenz (n = 95) LPV/RTV (n = 94) Number of Pts With HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL EFV LPV % 53.2% HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (%) 79% 49% 64% 57% P = P = 0.15 EFV LPV/RTV n = cell/mm 3 > 50 cell/mm 3 EFV met criteria for superiority to LPV/RTV: Δ 17% (CI 95%: 3.5% to 31.0%; P =.017) HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (%) By BL CD4+ Cell Count
Incidence of secondary PcP Incidence secondary PCP per 1000 PYFU (95% CI) Proph Events No 1 No 1 No 4 Yes 5 Yes 1 Yes 2 No 5 No 0* No 0* Yes 2 Yes 0* Yes 0* CD4 < 200CD4 > 200 < >10000< >10000 *No events; incidence and lower bound of 95% CI=0.0
Proporzione con Disturbi NP Prevalenza di HAND in epoca post-HAART (Studio CHARTER) Letendre et al., 2007
Updated CSF Penetration Effectiveness Scores Overall CPE score = sum of following scores for the individual agents ClassificationScoreAgents Good penetrators4IDV/RTV, NVP, ZDV Decent penetrators3ABC, DLV, DRV/RTV, EFV, FPV/RTV, FTC, IDV, LPV/RTV, MVC, RAL Limited penetrators23TC, ATV ± RTV, d4T, ddI, ETR, FPV Poor penetrators1ddC, ENF, NFV, RTV, SQV ± RTV, TDF, TPV Letendre S, et al. CROI Abstract 172.
MONOI: 48 Wk Outcomes With DRV/RTV Monotherapy vs Triple Therapy DRV/RTV monotherapy met criteria for noninferior virologic efficacy vs DRV/RTV + 2 NRTIs at Wk 48 in PP analysis, but not in ITT-E analysis –PP population = all pts from ITT population except pts who d/c tx without virologic failure or SAE (n = 10) or pts withdrawn without virologic failure or SAE (n = 6) Virologic failure in 3 pts (2.7%) on monotherapy vs 0 on standard therapy –Low DRV drug levels noted in 1 pt –No DRV RAMs in any pt with virologic failure –All 3 pts regained HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL on reintroduction of 2 NRTIs Virologic Response at Wk 48, %* DRV/ RTV + 2 NRTIs ΔLower Limit of 90% CI PP analysis (n = 204) ITT-E analysis (n = 225) Viremia detected in CSF in 2 of 3 pts with serious CNS disorders on monotherapy arm –Each pt had HIV-1 RNA < 200 c/mL in CSF following reintroduction of NRTIs Katlama C, et al. IAS Abstract WELBB102. Virologic failure defined as consecutive HIV-1 RNA > 400 c/mL or treatment modification or discontinuation
CONCLUSIONI La sopravvivenza del paziente libero da malattia deve essere lobiettivo della TARV. Il successo virologico costituisce un fattore essenziale per la prognosi a lungo termine. La prescrizione di un regime terapeutico deve tener conto anche della penetrazione nei diversi comparti.