Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Www.greenorbs.org Locating Sensors in the Wild: Pursuit of Ranging Quality Wei Xi, Yuan He, Yunhao Liu, Jizhong Zhao, Lufeng Mo, Zheng Yang, Jiliang Wang,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Www.greenorbs.org Locating Sensors in the Wild: Pursuit of Ranging Quality Wei Xi, Yuan He, Yunhao Liu, Jizhong Zhao, Lufeng Mo, Zheng Yang, Jiliang Wang,"— Presentation transcript:

1 www.greenorbs.org Locating Sensors in the Wild: Pursuit of Ranging Quality Wei Xi, Yuan He, Yunhao Liu, Jizhong Zhao, Lufeng Mo, Zheng Yang, Jiliang Wang, Xiangyang Li

2 www.greenorbs.org 2 Outline Motivation Observation on GreenOrbs Design of CDL Evaluation Ongoing work of GreenOrbs

3 www.greenorbs.org 3 GreenOrbs

4 www.greenorbs.org 4 Existing approaches (1) GPS Problems with tree covers Range-Based Approaches –TOA, TDOA, AOA Require extra hardware support Expensive in manufactory cost and energy consumption –RSSI-based Based on the log-normal shadowing model Inaccurate due to channel noise, interference, attenuation, reflection, and environmental dynamics

5 www.greenorbs.org 5 Existing approaches (2) Range-Free Approaches –Rely on connectivity measurements –The accuracy is affected by node density and network conditions RSD (SenSys ’ 09) –Regulated signature distance SISR (MobiCom ’ 09) –Merely differentiate good and bad links DV-Hop

6 www.greenorbs.org 6 Outline Motivation Observation on GreenOrbs Design of CDL Evaluation Ongoing work of GreenOrbs

7 www.greenorbs.org 7 Two-folded ranging quality 1. Irregular 2. Dynamic 3. Susceptible to the environment 4. Ubiquitous diverse errors Node location accuracy & range measurement accuracy Fine-grained differentiation is necessary!

8 www.greenorbs.org 8 Outline Motivation Observation on GreenOrbs Design of CDL Evaluation Ongoing work of GreenOrbs

9 www.greenorbs.org 9 1.Range-free localization: virtual-hop 2.Local filtration: two types of matching 3.Calibration: weighted robust estimation Design of CDL

10 www.greenorbs.org 10 DV-Hop r 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 When non-uniform deployment is present, nodes with equal hop- counts often have different distances to the landmark(s).

11 www.greenorbs.org 11 Virtual-hop localization For a node, its number of previous-hop or next-hop neighbors reflects the relative distance from the node to its parent node.

12 www.greenorbs.org 12 Virtual-hop vs. DV-hop Compared with DV-hop, Virtual-hop reduces the localization errors by 10%~99%.

13 www.greenorbs.org 13 Local filtration (1) Indiscriminate calibration probably reduces localization accuracy.

14 www.greenorbs.org 14 Local filtration (2) Bad nodes exhibit more mismatches Neighborhood hop-count matching –Compare the real hop-distance with the one calculated using estimated node coordinates (a) A good node with one bad neighbor (b) A bad node with six good neighbors

15 www.greenorbs.org 15 Local filtration (3) Neighborhood sequence matching NANA BCDEFG SASA 651243 SA’SA’ 641235 NANA BCDEFG SASA 651243 SA’SA’ 421365 Compare RSSI sequence with estimated distance sequence Matching degree

16 www.greenorbs.org 16 According to the matching degree, we sort nodes into three classes  Good  Bad  Undetermined Local filtration (4)

17 www.greenorbs.org 17 The basic objective function in LSE RQAC –Weight good nodes by good neighbors –Differentiates links with different ranging qualities Ranging-Quality Aware Calibration

18 www.greenorbs.org 18 Outline Motivation Observation on GreenOrbs Design of CDL Evaluation Ongoing work of GreenOrbs

19 www.greenorbs.org 19 Evaluation Setup –Experiments 100 GreenOrbs nodes (4 landmarks) –Simulations Randomly deploy 200~1000 nodes A 500*500m 2 square region Transmission range: 30m

20 www.greenorbs.org 20 Comparison AlgorithmError (m) DV-HOP8.7 MDS-MAP5.9 SISR5.6 CDL2.9

21 www.greenorbs.org 21 CDF of localization errors

22 www.greenorbs.org 22 Efficiency of iteration The number of good nodes quickly increases as iterations go on.

23 www.greenorbs.org 23 Humidity has a positive impact on the localization accuracy of all the four approaches. Impact of environmental factors

24 www.greenorbs.org 24 Increasing node density or landmarks yields better localization accuracy. Impact of system parameters

25 www.greenorbs.org 25 Summary of CDL GreenOrbs –A most challenging scenario of WSN localization Our belief: ranging quality is two-folded –The location accuracy of the reference nodes –The accuracy of range measurements Combined and Differentiated Localization –VH localization addresses non-uniform deployment –Filtration picks good nodes with good location accuracy –RQAC emphasizes the contribution of the best range measurements

26 www.greenorbs.org 26 Outline Motivation Observation on GreenOrbs Design of CDL Evaluation Ongoing work of GreenOrbs

27 www.greenorbs.org 27 Ongoing work of GreenOrbs New applications –Carbon sink/emissions measurements –Forest fire risk prediction Research on WSN management

28 www.greenorbs.org 28 Thanks! Q & A


Download ppt "Www.greenorbs.org Locating Sensors in the Wild: Pursuit of Ranging Quality Wei Xi, Yuan He, Yunhao Liu, Jizhong Zhao, Lufeng Mo, Zheng Yang, Jiliang Wang,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google