Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Drinking profiles, social capital and health in later life (2013-2014) Clare Holdsworth (PI)Nicola Shelton Marina MendonçaHynek Pikhart Martin FrisherCesar.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Drinking profiles, social capital and health in later life (2013-2014) Clare Holdsworth (PI)Nicola Shelton Marina MendonçaHynek Pikhart Martin FrisherCesar."— Presentation transcript:

1 Drinking profiles, social capital and health in later life (2013-2014) Clare Holdsworth (PI)Nicola Shelton Marina MendonçaHynek Pikhart Martin FrisherCesar Oliveira

2 Background Levels of alcohol consumption increased for middle and older age groups in the last 30 years for both men and women (Smith and Foxcroft, 2009). – Cohort effect (i.e. Generation) – Period effect (e.g. more financial resources) – Age (e.g. active ageing and greater life expectancy) Number of elderly population expected to increase 38% in the UK by 2031 (IAS, 2010): Alcohol consumption among the elderly - cause of public concern

3 Background U-shape relationship between alcohol consumption and health: Poorer health associated with abstainers (e.g. ‘sick- quitter’ hypothesis ) or excessive drinkers (e.g. Polen et al, 2010). Relation between drinking and health contradictory in older ages: – Alcohol consumption associated with more physical and mental health problems and higher mortality rates (e.g. Crome, et al. 2011; Dar, 2006; NHS Information Centre, 2008) – But, some studies found no association between levels of alcohol consumption and health (e.g. Lang, et al., 2007).

4 Background Alcohol consumption and health moderated by social capital (Bloomfield et al., 2006; Marmot 2005) – Alcohol Harm Paradox: Higher social position associated with higher alcohol consumption and better health, whereas alcohol-related illness and mortality linked with deprivation. Research on drinking behaviours focused both on quantity and frequency of drinking. – But findings suggest that they are not equally associated with health and social capital Unpacking complexity : Explore relationship between different drinking behaviours/profiles and its association with health and social capital

5 Aims To identify and characterize drinking profiles in older age To analyse how these drinking profiles are associated with social capital, health and socio-demographic characteristics

6 Data ELSA W0 (HSE): Baseline for alcohol variables Present study: – W0: Drinking and health variables – W1: Social capital variables 199819992001 W6 2012/13 W4 2008/9 W5 2010/11 W3 2006/7 W2 2004/5 W1 2002/3 N = 11205 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA): Panel study of people living in England aged 50 and older

7 Drinking Variables Drinking Profiles Drinking StatusAmount of AlcoholFrequency of drinking Non-drinkerNon-Drinker Drinker Below Limits (Men ≤21 units; Women≤ 14 units) Occasional (≤ 4 days) Low Drinker Daily (≥ 5days) Steady Drinker Above Limits (Men > 21 units Women > 14 unit) Occasional (≤ 4 days) Focal Drinker Daily (≥ 5days) Heavy Drinker Social Capital & Health Variables Level of EducationWealth QuintilesSESSelf-Rated Health Socio-demographic AgeMarital Status Variables

8 Men (%) (n = 5057) Women (%) (n = 6148) All (%) (N = 11205) Mean age at baseline62.09 (9.97)62.63 (10.49)62.39 (10.26) 45-6460.9059.2259.98 65-7425.7124.6925.15 75 +13.3916.0914.87 Marital Status Single6.394.985.62 Married/remarried76.0361.0467.81 Separated/divorced9.2012.3210.91 Widowed8.3921.6615.67 Educational Qualification No qualification37.0048.0143.04 Intermediate35.5834.7335.11 High27.4217.2521.84 Wealth Bottom quintile17.7721.0719.57 2 nd quintile19.8820.1120.00 3 rd quintile19.7420.1719.97 4 th quintile21.0219.2120.03 Top quintile21.6019.4420.42 SES Manual50.3636.4042.69 Non Manual48.2759.7954.60 Self-Rated Health Poor Health9.818.399.03 Fair Health23.75 25.07 24.48 Good Health66.44 66.5466.49 Descriptives: Socio-demographic, social capital and health variables by gender

9 Descriptives: Percentage distribution of drinking patterns by gender

10 Multinomial Logistic Regression: Odds of being Steady and Heavy/Binge Drinker versus Low Drinker Note: *** p<.001, **p<.01, *p<.05 Steady Heavy/Focal MenWomenMenWomen Age groups (Ref: 45-64) 65-741.54***1.94***.75**.92 75+2.21***3.05***.53***.78 Mar. Stat. (Ref: Married) Single1.38.671.60**.79 Separated/divorced.76.801.46**1.06 Widowed.96.811.57**.93 Self-Rat. Heal. (Ref: Poor) Fair.90.921.24.82 Good.711.031.46**1.03 Educ. Qual. (Ref.:No qual.) Intermediate1.141.251.19*1.27* High1.45**1.77***1.45***1.57*** Wealth (Ref.:Bottom) 2 nd 1.081.121.041.08 3 rd 1.281.08.861.02 4 th 1.77**1.55*1.011.33 Top2.36***2.47***1.34*2.00*** SES (Ref.: Manual) Non Manual1.171.41**.971.63***

11 Summary Gender: Important moderator of drinking behaviours. Men are more likely to be drinkers and to be heavy/focal drinkers than women. Age: Older participants are more likely to be steady drinkers, while those at ‘younger’ older ages are more likely to engage in heavy/focal drinking. Health: Drinking profiles are generally not associated with self-rated health, but male heavy drinkers are more likely to report better health. Social Capital: People in higher social position are more likely to be steady and heavy drinkers. This association is stronger for women. Marital Status: Being married seems to be a protective factor for men against heavy drinking

12 Thank you for your attention! For further information please contact mmendonca@keele.ac.uk

13 Descriptives: Sociodemographic, Health and Drinking Variables by Gender


Download ppt "Drinking profiles, social capital and health in later life (2013-2014) Clare Holdsworth (PI)Nicola Shelton Marina MendonçaHynek Pikhart Martin FrisherCesar."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google