1. Legislative and Regulatory Update: US Federal and State Initiatives IERI Electronics Recycling Education Program Jason Linnell Executive Director National Center for Electronics Recycling

2. Overview NCER Background NCER Background State Implementation Status State Implementation Status State Activity 2006 State Activity 2006 Federal Activity 2006 Federal Activity 2006 Trends/Outlook Trends/Outlook

3. National Center for Electronics Recycling Mission: dedicated to the development and enhancement of a national infrastructure for the recycling of used electronics in the U.S. through 1) the coordination of initiatives targeting the recycling of used electronics in the United States, 2) participation in pilot projects to advance and encourage electronics recycling, and 3) the development of programs that reduce the burden of government through private management of electronics recycling systems. Mission: dedicated to the development and enhancement of a national infrastructure for the recycling of used electronics in the U.S. through 1) the coordination of initiatives targeting the recycling of used electronics in the United States, 2) participation in pilot projects to advance and encourage electronics recycling, and 3) the development of programs that reduce the burden of government through private management of electronics recycling systems. Non-profit 501c3 Non-profit 501c3 Located in Parkersburg, WV area (Davisville) Located in Parkersburg, WV area (Davisville) –Polymer Tech Park

4. State-Level Policy Activities

5. How are states handling the challenge? Four programs with mandatory financing Four programs with mandatory financing –CA, ME, MD, and WA Others with active study commissions Others with active study commissions –MO, IL, RI, LA Upcoming or recent disposal bans Upcoming or recent disposal bans –MN, NH, RI, AR (others MA, CA) Coordinated regional policy strategy Coordinated regional policy strategy –Northeast States: CT, DE, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT –Midwest States: MN, MI, IL, WI, IA

6. California Two bills vetoed in 2002 – ARF of $15 Two bills vetoed in 2002 – ARF of $15 SB 20 adopted 2003/Amended 2004 by SB 50 SB 20 adopted 2003/Amended 2004 by SB 50 Point of sale fee on certain video display devices with screens > 4” diagonal Point of sale fee on certain video display devices with screens > 4” diagonal –$6, $8, or $10 depending on screen size –All “consumers” covered Effective January 1, 2005 on covered electronic devices (CEDs) designated by DTSC Effective January 1, 2005 on covered electronic devices (CEDs) designated by DTSC –CRT devices (TVs & monitors) –LCD devices (laptops and monitors) –LCD and Plasma TVs added July 1, 2005

7. CA Law – Recycling System Collection and Recycling Payments from State Collection and Recycling Payments from State –Authorized collector - $0.20/lb –Authorized recycler - $0.28/lb Payments only authorized for covered devices collected on or after 1/1/05 from CA sources (defined as users of the device in CA) Payments only authorized for covered devices collected on or after 1/1/05 from CA sources (defined as users of the device in CA) “Cancellation” activities (crushing, shredding, dismantling) must occur within CA “Cancellation” activities (crushing, shredding, dismantling) must occur within CA

8. CA Law – Operations to Date Approved Collectors: 441 Approved Collectors: 441 Approved Recyclers: 48 (some dual collectors) Approved Recyclers: 48 (some dual collectors) In 2005: BOE collected million $73 million In 2005: BOE collected million $73 million Claims approved for payment: $31 million or 65 m lbs Claims approved for payment: $31 million or 65 m lbs – 1.79 lbs/capita in 2005 Fees collected through 6/30/06 (estimate): Fees collected through 6/30/06 (estimate): –$33.3 million As of July 2006

9. Implementation in California 20,000 retailers; 28,500 locations registered to collect fee 20,000 retailers; 28,500 locations registered to collect fee 90% of fees from 300 large retailers filing monthly; 8-9,000 active quarterly filers 90% of fees from 300 large retailers filing monthly; 8-9,000 active quarterly filers 2006: 1 st quarter pounds claimed 3X’s 1 st quarter 2005 2006: 1 st quarter pounds claimed 3X’s 1 st quarter 2005 –97-98% claims for CRTs, rest “Other CEWs” Total govt admin costs through 6/30/06: $11.6 million Total govt admin costs through 6/30/06: $11.6 million –10.9% of fees collected –Retailers kept $3.3 million

10. Maine Passed in 2004: covers TVs and computer monitors (includes laptops) from Maine households Passed in 2004: covers TVs and computer monitors (includes laptops) from Maine households –Desktops only covered by brand labeling requirement Municipalities collect from household, send/contract to consolidators (facility or pickup) Municipalities collect from household, send/contract to consolidators (facility or pickup) –Collection from household not funded by system Consolidators count brands, follow ESM guidelines, bill manufacturers for actual count + orphan share Consolidators count brands, follow ESM guidelines, bill manufacturers for actual count + orphan share Manufacturers submit compliance plans, file reports, pay invoices from all (5) consolidators for “allowable costs” Manufacturers submit compliance plans, file reports, pay invoices from all (5) consolidators for “allowable costs”

11. Maine Law: Orphans Orphans: “Covered electronic device, the manufacturers of which cannot be identified or is no longer in business and has no successor in interest” Orphans: “Covered electronic device, the manufacturers of which cannot be identified or is no longer in business and has no successor in interest” DEP has to identify manufacturer “pro rata share” of orphans, provide to consolidators DEP has to identify manufacturer “pro rata share” of orphans, provide to consolidators –So far, 157 brands “orphan” by DEP –Only for OEMs over 1% total return share by product Example: OEM A has 20% pro rata monitor share; consolidator collects 1000 OEM A claimed brand monitors and 100 total orphan monitors Example: OEM A has 20% pro rata monitor share; consolidator collects 1000 OEM A claimed brand monitors and 100 total orphan monitors –OEM A billed for 1020 monitors at “reasonable cost” rate

12. Maine: Implementation Manufacturer plans required by 3/1/05 Manufacturer plans required by 3/1/05 –Collection plan, claim brands, still coming in As of September 26 As of September 26 –347 brands claimed from –149 manufacturers 21 manufacturers with 28 brands on “DO NOT SELL” list (9/26/06) 21 manufacturers with 28 brands on “DO NOT SELL” list (9/26/06) Quirks, mis-identified, still researching Quirks, mis-identified, still researching

13. Maine Began 1/18/06 Began 1/18/06 5 consolidators approved, 2 up and running 5 consolidators approved, 2 up and running Manufacturers receiving bills based on actual count + orphan share (29 manufacturers with share) Manufacturers receiving bills based on actual count + orphan share (29 manufacturers with share) 2 staff managing program, plus staff at consolidator – tracking brands, invoicing OEMs 2 staff managing program, plus staff at consolidator – tracking brands, invoicing OEMs No recycling data until after October, when consolidator reports due No recycling data until after October, when consolidator reports due

14. Maryland Computer Recycling Law HB 575 passed in 2005 HB 575 passed in 2005 Creates a statewide computer recycling pilot program for 5 years Creates a statewide computer recycling pilot program for 5 years –Effective January 1, 2006, Ends 12/31/10 Registration and fee required for manufacturers of more than 1,000 computers per year Registration and fee required for manufacturers of more than 1,000 computers per year –1000 can be sold anywhere, not just in MD Computers defined as: “desktop personal computer or laptop computer, including the computer monitor“ Computers defined as: “desktop personal computer or laptop computer, including the computer monitor“ –Like CA/ME, covered products must be brand labeled

15. Maryland Recycling Law cont’d Initial Registration fee for all OEMs $5000, then: Initial Registration fee for all OEMs $5000, then: –$5,000 if manufacturer does NOT implement a computer take-back program –$500 if manufacturer DOES implement a program Takeback program guidelines flexible Takeback program guidelines flexible Registration money into state recycling trust fund Registration money into state recycling trust fund –Used to provide collection/recycling grants to local governments First year for education campaign, not recycling grants First year for education campaign, not recycling grants Registered Manufacturers as of 6/30/06: Registered Manufacturers as of 6/30/06: –37 Companies, or $185,000

16. Washington Signed by governor on 3/24/06 Signed by governor on 3/24/06 –4 th major state electronics recycling program –Different than other 3 in significant ways Producer Responsibility with default Producer Responsibility with default –Manufacturer responsible for “equivalent share” either on own or pay into State TPO –No collection goal, but must meet your % at year’s end or pay penalty (refund if collecting more than %) Orphans must be calculated by DOE Orphans must be calculated by DOE –Covers CA/ME products + Desktops –Ban on exports to developing countries according to Basel Convention [VETOED] –Programs must be effective Jan 2009

17. Disposal Bans In effect In effect –California: CRTs and all consumer electronic devices –Massachusetts: CRTs –Maine: CRTs –Minnesota: CRTs Upcoming Upcoming –Rhode Island: CRTs –New Hampshire (video display devices) –Arkansas: authority to DEQ in 2008

18. Comparing the Financing CA: Point of Sale fee, to state agency, all sellers and sales CA: Point of Sale fee, to state agency, all sellers and sales ME: No state funding, or manufacturer registration fees, Municipalities fund household collection, manufacturers from consolidation on ME: No state funding, or manufacturer registration fees, Municipalities fund household collection, manufacturers from consolidation on MD: Annual manufacturer registration fee, state agency administration MD: Annual manufacturer registration fee, state agency administration WA: Annual manufacturer registration fee + all costs for meeting “equivalent share” on own or through new quasi-government TPO WA: Annual manufacturer registration fee + all costs for meeting “equivalent share” on own or through new quasi-government TPO

19. Financing-Specific Challenges CA: Can’t enforce on out of state sellers CA: Can’t enforce on out of state sellers ME: No funds for collection, finding and enforcing on manufacturers out of country, reliable orphan data ME: No funds for collection, finding and enforcing on manufacturers out of country, reliable orphan data MD: Finding manufacturers with different product scope, funding insufficient for major state program MD: Finding manufacturers with different product scope, funding insufficient for major state program WA: State setting “equivalent share,” unknown total quantities, finding/enforcing on manufacturers WA: State setting “equivalent share,” unknown total quantities, finding/enforcing on manufacturers

20. Patchwork Study NCER initiative under National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse NCER initiative under National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse –www.ecyclingresource.org www.ecyclingresource.org ID and quantify “dead weight” costs of differing state programs ID and quantify “dead weight” costs of differing state programs –Sought input from all stakeholders –Assumes 2 additional states by 2012 Preliminary results (to debut at E-Scrap) Preliminary results (to debut at E-Scrap) –Recurring costs per year: $25 million –One time costs per new state: $3 million

21. Proposed Legislation 2006

22. Legislation in 2006 Over 25 states have introduced Over 25 states have introduced –Not including carryover bills from 2005 Types of Bills Types of Bills –Advanced recovery fees – at POS and Manufacturer/first point of possession With and without TPO With and without TPO –Producer responsibility, many variations –Studies, commissions & task forces –Landfill &/or incineration bans –California amendments (product scope, material restrictions)/Maine amendments

23. Regional Model Legislation and Study Committees

24. NERC/Council of State Governments Northeast Recycling Council/Council of State Governments Initiative Northeast Recycling Council/Council of State Governments Initiative 10 states coordinated to develop on regional electronics recycling model legislation 10 states coordinated to develop on regional electronics recycling model legislation New England (including Maine), New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware New England (including Maine), New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware

25. NERC/Council of State Governments Status Status –Introduced in Delaware, NY Basic elements Basic elements –Same scope as WA bill- desktop, monitors, TVs Financing model: Financing model: –Manufacturer pays $5k registration to State, AND –Fee for its “obligation” OR collect/recycle equivalent amount; formula for obligation based on recycling rate –TPO optional for state, can coordinate with multi-state entity

26. Midwest Regional Electronic Waste Recycling Policy Initiative State agencies, not legislators worked on regional model similar to NERC/ERC: Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Iowa State agencies, not legislators worked on regional model similar to NERC/ERC: Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Iowa Drafted legislation, but released “policy statement” Drafted legislation, but released “policy statement” Elements of policy statement: Elements of policy statement: –Same product scope as NERC/ERC and WA –Manufacturer pays registration fee and must collect/recycle their obligation; own program or fee to state –Obligation based on previous year’s sales –States may choose to authorize TPO and/or multi-state entity

27. Federal Legislative Activity

28. Congressional Hearings! 2005: E-Waste Working Group formed – four House Representatives 2005: E-Waste Working Group formed – four House Representatives –2 Hearings in House, one in Senate Bills in House and Senate, not moving Bills in House and Senate, not moving –1 ARF, two based on tax credits for manufacturers and/or consumers Meeting held September 13 Meeting held September 13 –Another scheduled for mid-November –Goal of WG is legislation introduced next session

29. Other Federal Activity EPA Baseline Data Report EPA Baseline Data Report Department of Commerce Report Department of Commerce Report Government Accountability Office 2005 Report Government Accountability Office 2005 Report

30. Conclusions/Outlook More to learn in 2007 More to learn in 2007 –CA implementation compared to MD/ME –Maine/Maryland begin implementation –Movement towards WA implementation More state programs? More state programs? –MA, MN, WI, MI, OR –Pressure on RI, NH from 2006 bills –Will NERC/ERC model move in Northeast? Will Congress move on legislation? Will Congress move on legislation? –Funding hard to come by in current climate –Will increasing state differences lead to more national action?

31. Thank You! Jason Linnell NCER Phone: (304) 699-1008 jlinnell@electronicsrecycling.org