1. Team Excel What is SPAM ?

2. Spam Offense Team Excel '‘a distinctive chopped pork shoulder and ham mixture'' Image Source:Appscout.com

3. Emails Misdirected into Honeypot The domain name used in the study honeypot is not given Opportunity for legitimate mail due to “typos” Examples:  user@google.com user@google.com  user@gooogle.com user@gooogle.com  user@go0gle.com user@go0gle.com  user@googlw.com user@googlw.com Image Source: Apple.com Typos can happen!

4. Primary Country Data is Misleading Number of SMAM messages is not normalized against number of legitate messages While China has a large number of SPAM messages, it also has the 2 nd largest number of online Internet users SPAM is a problem in China AND the U.S. Example: Internet Population Table 1: Top Spam Networks Source: InternetWorldStats.com

5. Route Stability Route stability to determine whether or not a message is spam will be difficult and may result in false positives. The short lived IP subnets, could be due to flapping of Internet links in which BGP is flushing/adding/then flushing the route. Global Internet Threat The Backhoe Fiber Map Route Frequency Source: Wired.com and Benmautner.com

6. Black Lists Blacklisting an entire AS runs the risk of blocking legitimate traffic and/or legitimate email Blocking an IP address or group of IPs, especially in the case when NAT is used, could result in blocking legitimate mail Image Source: Bonq.org

7. Email ISP Selection The trace file of "legitimate email" from an ISP could be partial to particular ISPs, depending on who the customers of the ISP communicate with The demographics of the sample data may play a part in why email is seen from certain ISPs Comparing "legitimate email" from an ISP, provides little value in comparison to the "SPAM email" sample

8. Incomplete Data by Country The data is not normalized. Saying Korea and China produce the most SPAM, may be true, however the total amount of email messages processed (both good and SPAM) is not given It is possible China produces 10 times more email than other countries since the population is much higher When normalized it is possible the percent of SPAM vs. non-SPAM is lower in China than other countries

9. DNS registration Methodology Using DNS name lookup only to collect spam limits the scope and type of spam received, such as mail received from Harvesters and mailing lists, thus limiting spammer capability types.

10. BotNet The generalization of Bobax data across all botnets will generate misleading results Behavior may be different

11. Spammers sending limited messages The conclusion that hosts send finite messages to the sinkhole may be a symptom of the behavior of the sinkhole rather than the behavior of the botnet

12. Route based spam detection Route based spam detection is limited correlating route behavior to spam There are many reasons for short lived routes, so detection of spam by detecting short lived routes will need to be used in conjunction with other methods to detect spam

13. Spam Filters What is the likely-hood of network level filters blocking legitimate e-mail? What if a corporation makes a change to their MX records – will their technique cause issues? Most corporate filters allow some spam through vs. risk blocking legitimate e-mail

14. Destination Security The results of the study could be flawed due to security measures on the Internet The researchers attempts to trace back to hosts, may have been blocked by access-lists on routers, and/or firewalls It is also conceivable the "hijack" of the botnet they performed may of caused other ISPs to "blacklist" the researchers thinking they were possible Spammers

15. Intelligent Spammers Study assumes that spamming technology is static Spammers continually adjust tactics to minimize the effectiveness of new efforts of screening

16. The SPAM Offensive Team Glenn Allison Bryan “BDT” TabiadonJoe Mathew Dan HoadleyRaj Varma Michael Ehrenhofer

17. Thank you VOTE OFFENSE