Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

International Relations

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "International Relations"— Presentation transcript:

1 International Relations
Introduction to International Relations Realism and Liberalism Prof. Jaechun Kim

2 BOP (Balance of Power) Theory
Realism Liberalism 3rd level BOP (Balance of Power) Theory Theory of Interdependence 2nd level Democratic Peace 1st level

3 Realism and Liberalism
They are not simple theories as in economic theory of demand and supply… Assumptions about the world and IR… Philosophical and fundamental… Realism is not a unified theory, so is Liberalism… Different strands of realism and liberalism

4 Realism A more dominant theory…. I guess…
More realists than liberalists… According to realism, world is conflict-ridden, hence very dangerous place… Conflict and war is ordinary…

5 Realist assumption about the “state of the nature” in IR
FUNDAMENTAL TENETS OF REALISM AND LIBERALISM Realist assumption about the “state of the nature” in IR    “Natural state” of IR is (permanent) state of war (among states). Why?   Anarchy  Self-help system (arm yourself!)  Security Dilemma  Arms Race  Temptation of Preemptive Strike  Constant Possibility of War War is very natural!!

6 John Prisoner's Dilemma C D -3 -20 -10 C Jane D DC > CC > DD

7 Liberalist assumption about the natural state of IR
*Thucydides - Peloponnesian War : “The growth of power of the Athens and the fear this caused in Sparta made the war inevitable.” World is a very dangerous place!!  Liberalist assumption about the natural state of IR  Heterogeneous state of war and peace. Why?  Natural laws : natural rights and natural duties cf. Hobbes, Leviathan, “war of all against all” In IR and DR, natural laws are observed… Introduction to International Relations

8 Realist assumption about the human nature (Classical realism)
Human nature is inherently evil Machiavelli; Morgenthau; E.H Carr Liberalist assumption about the human nature Inborn nature is good or at least human-beings can learn Relevant “Actors” of IR Realism – state; non-state actors simply reflect the interests of the states! Liberalism – Non-state actors have independent impact on IR ! Introduction to International Relations

9 State as “unitary” actor?
Realism – state is a unitary actor Liberalism – state isn’t really unitary actor… (cf. Neo-liberalists) State as “functionally similar unit”? Realism – state is functionally similar unit. They pursue power and security. They only differ in capabilities. Liberalism – states are inherently different units! Can be differentiated by how they relate to individual human rights Introduction to International Relations

10 Primacy of “National Interests”?
R – state’s interests can be distinguished from individual rights; less room for moral consideration in conducting world affairs Machiavelli – “A wise Prince knows how to do wrong when it is necessary!” “Ends justify means!” L – “national interests” is a dubious concept… Primary goal of state? R – to increase power and security L – protection of individual autonomy and human rights Introduction to International Relations

11 Most important variable in IR?
R – “power” or “material capabilities” L – “idea” and “institution” is also important… Future of IR? R – pacific international order is impossible; int’l order not based on power and force is a sham!; the same story over and over again! L – possibility of perpetual peace! IR is not a jungle, it is rather a garden! Foreign policy guidelines R – realpolitik (balance of power politics); national interests first… Introduction to International Relations

12 L – int’l order based on BOP is dangerous; state leaders should promote liberalist ideas and institutions 3 legs of liberalism Liberal Democracies, Liberal Economic Institutions, and International Institutions and Laws Introduction to International Relations

13 Classical Realism vs. Neo Realism
Machiavelli; Morgenthau More emphasis on “human nature” States want to increase power Neo R (or Structural Realism) K. Waltz; J. Mearsheimer More emphasis on the structure of International System (structural realism)! states want to increase security Offensive Realism vs. Defensive Realism


Download ppt "International Relations"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google