1. Arizona Group B Teachers SLO Informational Webinar Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone Deputy Associate Superintendent of Research & Evaluation

2. Agenda Group B Options for Pilot Year 1 Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Types of Assessments Timeline Steps of Development Examples This is adapted from the Indiana Department of Education, RISE Evaluation and Development System. 2

3. General Weighting for Teachers in Arizona’s Teacher Evaluation Model 33% School/Classroom-Level Data 17% Survey/Peer Review/Self-Reflection 50% Teaching Performance 3

4. Student Learning Objectives Definition: A student learning objective (SLO) is a classroom level standards-based measure relevant to the content area taught during the current school year that is: Specific and measureable Based on available prior student learning data Written to measure growth and/or achievement AZ Teacher Evaluation model contains Classroom SLOs and Targeted SLOs for a subset of students. 4

5. Classroom SLOs A measure of student mastery within a specific content area. For the AZ Teacher Evaluation model we require this objective to include all students in a class/classes for one content area. Examples: 1.90% of the students will pass Algebra I 2.18 out of 20 students will score a 3 or higher on the AP World History exam 5

6. Targeted SLOs A measure of student growth for a particular set of students in the lowest level of preparedness in order to master the content area. Examples: 1.4 out of 6 students will increase 10 words per minute over their baseline median score on the Oral Reading Fluency assessment. 2.2 out of 3 students will improve one achievement level on the Drama performance final exam. 6

7. Pre-Approved Assessment Types for SLOs 7 Evaluator Approved CONFIDENCE

8. Two Options for PILOT 1 - Group B In PILOT 1, every teacher (Group A and Group B) will be partially evaluated on School-wide/Grade Level Data and have the option of using SLOs: Option 1: Group B teachers (Grades: K, 1, 7-12 non-tested subject teachers, Specials Teachers, and Resource Teachers) will be evaluated on one SLO and School-wide/Grade Level Data Each Group B teacher will choose one class to set the SLO used in the evaluation Option2: Group B teachers will use only School-wide/Grade Level Data (e.g., AIMS data and/or other school-wide data) 8

9. Timeline for the SLO Process 9 *Students will be classified in one of three categories: low, medium, or high preparedness for the current course. Evaluation

10. Steps of the SLO Process 10

11. Examples Data Used for Teacher Evaluation

12. Grades K-1 Teachers

13. Achievement 17% Growth 20% 13

14. Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 44 Points (37% of total)* Achievement20 Classroom SLO – Reading 8 Current Student- Level Data Classroom SLO – Mathematics 8 Percent At or Above the 5 th Stanine on the Grade 2 Stanford 10 - Reading 4 Previous Year Scores from Class of Students Growth24 Targeted SLO - Reading 24 Current Student- Level Data Grades K-1 Teachers * The weighting on school/classroom-level data is greater for grades K-1 because the student survey is not part of their evaluation. 14

15. PILOT 1: Grades K-1 Teachers Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 44 Points (37% of total) Achievement20 Classroom SLO – Reading 8 Current Student- Level Data Classroom SLO – Mathematics 8 Percent At or Above the 5 th Stanine on the Grade 2 Stanford 10 – Reading 20 Previous Year Scores from Class of Students Growth24 Targeted SLO - Reading 24 Current Student- Level Data 15

16. SLO Example: K-1 Targeted SLO: 3 of the 5 students identified at the lowest level of “preparedness” (e.g., “Well-Below” benchmark goal on DIBELs) will increase one level between fall and spring tests. Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3)Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students have surpassed the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated outstanding growth. The students have met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated considerable growth. The students have not fully met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. The students have not met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. 16

17. SLO Example: K-1 Classroom SLO: At least 28 out of 31 students (90%) will score “At or Above” the benchmark goal on DIBELs on the spring test. Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3) Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students met the SLO 60%- 79% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 17

18. Grade 12 Group B

19. Grade 12 Group B Teacher Achievement 7% Growth 20% Career & College Ready 6% 19

20. Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/ Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 40 Points (33% of total) Achievement*8 Classroom SLO4 Current Student-Level Data from Classroom Classroom SLO4 Growth24Targeted SLO24 Current Student-Level Data from Classroom Career & College Ready 8 Graduation Rate6Prior Year Percent scoring at a CCR on SAT/ACT 2 Prior Year Grade 12 Group B Teachers 20 *AP courses will be included in the Achievement component if available

21. Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/ Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 40 Points (33% of total) Achievement8 Classroom SLO4 Current Student-Level Data from Classroom Classroom SLO4 Growth24Targeted SLO24 Current Student-Level Data from Classroom Career & College Ready 16 Graduation Rate10Prior Year Percent scoring at a CCR on SAT/ACT 6 Prior Year PILOT 1: Gr12 Group B Teachers 21

22. SLO Example: Secondary Targeted SLO: 7 of the 10 students identified at the lowest level of “preparedness” will increase their score by 10 points on the end of course government assessment. Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3)Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students have surpassed the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated outstanding growth. The students have met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated considerable growth. The students have not fully met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. The students have not met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. 22

23. SLO Example: Secondary Classroom SLO: At least 90% of the students will achieve a minimum score of 85 out of 100 points on the end of course assessment. Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3) Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students will meet the SLO 60%- 79% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 23

24. Group B Specials Teacher

25. Achievement 10% Growth 20% Career & College Ready 3% 25

26. Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 40 Points (33% of total) Achievement12SLO Across Grades12 Current Student- Level Data from Classroom Growth24 Targeted SLO Across Grades 24 Career & College Ready 4 Choice of the following Graduation Rate 4 Prior Year Classroom Percent of Grade 8 Students Passing AIMS Mathematics AIMS CCR Equivalent Score Group B Specials Teachers 26

27. PILOT 1: Grp B Specials Teachers Percent of School- Level Data Category Point Value School/Classroom Level Data Point Value Data Source 40 Points (33% of total) Achievement12SLO Across Grades16 Current Student- Level Data from Classroom Growth36Targeted SLO36 Career & College Ready 4 Choice of the following Graduation Rate 4 Prior Year Classroom Percent of Grade 8 Students Passing on AIMS Mathematics AIMS CCR Equivalent Score 27

28. SLO: Elementary Music Teacher Targeted SLO: 7 out of 10 of targeted students will increase one or more proficiency level from the beginning of the course to the end of the course on the music performance rubric. Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3)Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students have surpassed the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated outstanding growth. The students have met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO and/or have demonstrated considerable growth. The students have not fully met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. The students have not met the teacher’s expectations described in the targeted SLO. 28

29. Classroom SLO: At least 90% of the students will achieve a minimum score of 85 out of 100 points on the end of course physical fitness test. Rubric Rubric: Complete Attainment (4) High Attainment (3) Moderate Attainment (2) Minimal Attainment (1) The students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students will meet the SLO 60%- 79% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO SLO: Physical Education Teacher 29

30. Questions? 30