Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Family Law Association of Ireland Pensions & Family Law - Problems and Pitfalls Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Family Law Association of Ireland Pensions & Family Law - Problems and Pitfalls Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Family Law Association of Ireland Pensions & Family Law - Problems and Pitfalls Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman

3 Pension Provisions of the Family Law Acts  designed to allow distribution of pension to “other spouse”  pensions last in line - other property first  all forms of pension included - occupational, AVCs, self-employed, buyout bonds, etc.

4 PAOs do not seem to be as common as value of assets implies  Are pensions traded off against other assets?  Do parties realise the real value of pensions?

5 If PAOs to be applied for…  PAOs will have to be applied for, for each scheme, and for each type of benefit Therefore essential to be able to identify and understand what is there

6 Example of pension value  Public servant, salary €50,000 When 40 years completed, pension 25K, gratuity 75k, Spouse 12.5k plus post retirement increases Official value then (65), about €600k  Open market annuity cost more like €800k At age 45, has “earned” about half of that – value at 65 about 300k. Actuarial value declared is c. €113k discounted at 5%, €93k at 6%

7 That’s not the full picture….  The transfer value is the present value if the asset is taken out of the scheme  If it’s left where it is, it benefits from future pay increases, promotion etc (though not future service)  Potential value may be enormous (If he became Sec. Gen., 50% of half his pension is worth €1.24M)

8 Alternative Asset  Perhaps, a house?  Assuming no mortgage: Value in 2007, €600,000 Value today, €400,000 Value at 65?  But house is immediately disposable asset, pension is not

9 Types of pension arrangement covered by the Act  Occupational Pension Scheme per Pensions Act 1990  Retirement Annuity Contract (personal pension)  RAC under Trust  Approved Policy (“buyout bond”)  Any other scheme or arrangement Designed to provide benefits  on retirement, leaving, cessation of employment  for widow/er, dependants or other persons, on death

10 Occupational Pension Scheme  Occupational Pension Schemes may be Statutory – set up by or pursuant to public statute, by Ministerial Order  If not statutory, must be constituted under irrevocable trusts

11 Retirement Annuity Contracts  Contract between member and provider ( s.235, ITA 1967, s.784 TCA 1997 )  Normally effected by self-employed  Open to anyone in non-pensionable employment  Personal property of member Unless effected under trust  S. 235 (4) ITA 1967, s. 784(4) TCA 1997

12 Approved Policy (buyout bond)  Effected with a provider by trustees of Occupational Pension Scheme On leaving service Or as a result of winding-up Or by transfer resulting from a PAO  Contract is direct liability of provider to Member

13 Any other arrangement….  PRSA (personal Retirement Savings Account) Very like RAC, but never under trust Personal property of holder  Annuity, immediate or deferred  Unfunded promise Some things don’t look like pension schemes: e.g., Retained Fire Officers’ Gratuity scheme

14 Two types of Pension Scheme  DEFINED BENEFIT[DB] AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION [DC]  defined benefit makes a promise of benefits, usually expressed as fraction of final salary [also called "final salary" schemes] cost not determined in advance  defined contribution makes no benefit promise, only contribution whatever that buys is the benefit cost known and fixed

15 DB or DC  Occupational schemes may be DB, DC or both  RACs are always DC  PRSAs are always DC  Additional Voluntary Contributions (AVCs) may be DB (rare) or DC and may be made to main scheme or to legally separate arrangement  Buyout bonds DC with rare exceptions

16 Arrangements not defined in the Act  “Target” benefit: always DC  “Hybrid” schemes –usually a combination of DB and DC - may have to be treated for PAO purposes as two different schemes  This may also happen in DB scheme with DC AVC arrangement under the same trusts NB: If any element of DB present, legally DB

17 Self-Administered Schemes  Self-administered so called to distinguish from traditional insured vehicles – means “directly invested”  “Small self-administered schemes” a special category Pensioneer trustee Now almost all one-member arrangements They are the only schemes allowed to borrow Watch net asset values, gearing/borrowing, liquidity

18 The Public Sector  Although Public Service benefit patterns are broadly similar, lots of differences of detail between schemes: e.g., Local Government, Civil Service, Semi-States, Health service (3 main schemes); Defence Forces, Judiciary, etc etc.  All have separate schemes for Spouses’ and Children's benefits  Separate (Union-sponsored) schemes for AVCs may also exist

19 In the Public Service….  You may need up to six separate elements in a PAO  Main scheme: covers retirement pension for member and lump sum (gratuity at retirement or death): pension and retirement gratuity are retirement benefits  Death gratuity is contingent benefit

20 Public Service –cont’d  Spouses’/children’s scheme separate: Death-in-Service pensions contingent; Pensions separate for spouse/children Children’s pensions double on spouse death Non-marital children benefit Death-in-Retirement benefit is retirement benefit  If separate AVC scheme exists, benefits are both retirement and contingent  Careful: Some older schemes may have non-standard rules

21 Information Required - General  Requirement to give particulars of property- including pension rights  General information on pensions: Scheme name or other identification Member name Date first covered Pensionable pay / calculation AVCs details Rights transferred into scheme

22 Information from the Trustees - DB  Calculation of each element of retirement benefit- as if leaving service  Method/s of calculation  Date/s payable  Provision for Increase?  Actuarial value Solvency caveat

23 Information from the Trustees - DC  Accumulated value of fund  Date/s payable Explanation of how fund translates to Retirement Benefit

24 Information from the Trustees – Contingent benefit  Calculation of amount of each element of DB Assuming death of member spouse Specify scheme rule or policy number  Method/s of calculation

25 Trustees  May make representations to the Court  Are entitled to expenses, costs incurred in complying with a PAO or a direction of the Court  Costs payable by parties 50/50 if no Order  Trustee may apply to Court to recover costs from benefits

26 Order served on Trustees  To be served by Registrar or Clerk of the Court.  Member record must be tagged by trustees to show existence of PAO

27 The need to record...  PAOs can be affected by later events…. death of the beneficiary death of dependant or cessation of dependency death of the member spouse leaving service early retirement - ill-health or normal health transfer of benefits  Records must highlight that PAO exists, so that appropriate action is triggered

28 Disclosure requirements cover… Regulation 17 and Schedule G of Disclosure Regulations SI 301 of 2006*  Request for Information on Designated Benefit  Receipt of a PAO  Defined Benefit Scheme  Defined Contribution Scheme (or section)  Retirement – early, normal, late  Death before/after: member, spouse, child dependant  Termination of relevant employment  Notification to the Court * Similar requirements for Trust RACs SI 182 of 2007

29 The Prudent Trustee  Does not accept PAO at face value  Tests for feasibility of implementation  Cost of review –can be expensive  Not paid from scheme funds  Queries to us on PAOs more common: 2003-07: 11 in total;2008: 12; 2009:16; 2010 to August: 14  Most problems have yet to surface!!

30 Problems with PAOs  Sometimes drafted on back of envelope  No resemblance to what the Notice of Motion asked for  Specified percentage and period not clear  When an order is not an order…  “Sorted if he dies, before or after retirement” (but not if he lives to collect his pension)  Was the PAO actually served?

31 More problems…  Public Service “old” schemes – second spouse not covered if remarriage after retirement  Divorce Decree referred to pension - not a PAO; real PAO referred to S&C scheme – trustees confused  Order referred to Retirement Benefits – intention was only death-in-retirement – ex parte application, new PAO  Affidavit of Means - “Not in receipt of…”

32 And More  Non-member spouse may find it hard to get information Insurer/broker/client relationships Client (employer/trustee may be member spouse)  Irish member of UK scheme – PAO not enforceable under UK statutory regime  Transfer/clean break if scheme insolvent?

33 And finally….  The Acts were not drafted by pensions people Unforeseen consequences, e.g., death of non-member spouse Public service issues

34 Office of the Pensions Ombudsman  36 Upper Mount St, Dublin 2  Phone 01 647 1653  Fax 01 676 9577  E-mail info@pensionsombudsman.ieinfo@pensionsombudsman.ie  Web www.pensionsombudsman.iewww.pensionsombudsman.ie


Download ppt "Family Law Association of Ireland Pensions & Family Law - Problems and Pitfalls Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google