1. 1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Direct Drive Wave Energy Buoy Ken Rhinefrank [Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.] [krhinefrank@columbiapwr.com] [November 2, 2011] Manta Direct Drive Wave Energy Converter

2. 2 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration Challenges-Barriers-Knowledge Gaps Wave energy is the only renewable energy source that is not commercially installed. Numerous designs and concepts exist and most are early stage with limited knowledge concerning the actual CoE or ability to operate and survive in this harsh environment. Furthermore the systems can be complex in design, non- linear in performance and include numerous cost uncertainties such as grid integration and permitting. In real sea conditions, numerical energy predictions can be off by over 40%. Until prototypes are designed built and tested we will not know the true cost of energy or be able to reliably forecast methods of cost reduction.

3. 3 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration How Solving Problem Relates to Program Mission The design and development of a wave energy system is complex and detailed. Only through a staged project development approach, where actual performance and operation are measured and observed experimentally at a sufficiently large scale and where complete system designs are developed, built and tested, can the actual cost of energy can be assessed.

4. 4 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration Integration of this Project Results from this project are used to inform the utility- scale design process, improve cost estimates, accurately forecast energy production and to observe system operation and survivability. Knowledge and experience gained from this project is applied to major program objectives including: Design and certification of the commercial-scale system Land-based test of a commercial-scale generator, bearing and seals Open-ocean deployment of a commercial-scale DDR WEC in conjunction with a recognized independent testing center.

5. 5 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Project Approach The primary goal of this project is an intermediate-scale (1:7) bay/ocean test of a novel Direct-Drive Rotary Wave Energy Converter (DDR WEC). Key tasks include: WEC Optimization –Shape, CG, inertial using AQWA and Wave Dyne numerical models –PTO Controls Optimization 33 rd scale tank testing, performance and survival analysis 7 th scale testing at sea (design, build, deployment and experiments) Data analysis of 7 th scale results Integration of findings into Commercial Scale Design

6. 6 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov WEC body optimization complete AQWA numerical optimization Over 368 unique shape simulations 311 unique CG and inertia simulations 1700+ hours of computer simulation time “Gen 3.1” 230% energy capture improvement versus “Gen 3 “ 15 th scale PTO Controls Optimization Ballast Optimization Interim Optimization Report complete Technical Approach

7. 7 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov 33 rd scale tank testing and performance analysis complete Design & Fabrication complete Testing services and test plan contracted and completed Regular waves, irregular waves, 50 year and 100 year storm waves Wave data has been analyzed Performance measures and RAO’s assessed Numerical and experimental comparisons in progress, example RAO below Technical Approach

8. 8 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach 7 th scale Testing at sea (design, fabrication, ops. and experiment) SEA TRIAL UNDERWAY Seattle Deployment Site

9. 9 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Data Analysis Data Collection and Deployment ongoing  Wave occurrence is ~40% of the time in winter  Remote WEC data collection through 3G network  AWAC data collection through periodic site visits  7-24 surveillance camera  Solar power small waves in summer  Periodic service visits  Periodic battery charges Analysis Methodology is developed  Third-party review of approach ongoing  Statistical characterization of waves  Assessment of data quality Integrate Findings into Commercial Scale Design Design in progress

10. 10 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Plan, Schedule, & Budget Schedule Initiation date: December 1, 2009 Planned completion date: March 26, 2011 –Deployment extended beyond May 2011 by up to nine months to collect more data Milestones FY10  WEC Optimization  33 rd scale wave tank experiment  7 th scale design FY11  Permits approved  7 th scale fabrication complete  Deployment Underway  WEC Recovery  Data Analysis  Commercial design integration

11. 11 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Plan, Schedule, & Budget Go/no-go decision points FY12/FY13 –Performance and cost assessment –Utility scale prototype site selection –Project funding availability for major tasks: PTO test Commercial scale build and deployment Budget: Remaining budget will be utilized during remainder of deployment period 71% of budget utilized to date. Budget History FY2009FY2010FY2011 DOECost-shareDOECost-shareDOECost-share 00$573K $601K

12. 12 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Accomplishments and Results 230% increase in energy capture Successful Design/Fabrication, Puget Sound-Deployment Knowledge gained through the design, fabrication, test and deployment of a 7 ton intermediate scale WEC is extensive and has proven to be an essential and valuable stage in our technology readiness level. Continued operation at sea for over eight months This milestone is demonstrating a viable technology for extracting energy from ocean waves and provides confidence in our design as we move toward an open-ocean utility-scale demonstration. Preliminary indications of energy generation are on track with numerical estimates.

13. 13 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date Prototype Power draw very high Causes: Active/Standby design load 60/40 W, design creep and deviation from spec ->105W 105W = 95 kW full scale equivalent -> “Instrumentation does not scale down well” Original charge frequency 20 to 25 days with average WEC shaft power of 45W Deployment extension into summer months (less wave energy) Power electronics failure Solutions: $3k battery charges at 2x per week Installation of Solar panels kept electronics working all summer without charges Upgrades to wave energy power electronics Future systems installed in small scale wave climates need more storage and backup energy sources.

14. 14 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date DDR voltage and power variance and high demand on electronics eventually caused failure Causes: Cyclic speed and voltage with average levels an order of magnitude lower than peak. Possible damage due to thermal overload No commercially viable solution that fit the prototype needs requiring a custom solution at this scale. Accelerated design path to meet schedule Solutions: Original design and backup designs planned for this failure and applied linear damping controls even in failed conditions which allowed for continued collection of performance data. Redesigned and repaired power electronics. Commercial design includes cost tradeoffs between voltage peak reduction and over- specified power electronics. Post deployment autopsy to find possible cause

15. 15 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date Wave data analysis at 1:7 scale is difficult in ocean setting Causes: Relatively deep water (22m) decreased high frequency response of AWAC 7 th scale spectrum is at the high frequency limit of commercially available and deployable wave monitoring instruments that were practical at this location. Regionally available intermediate scaled (1:4 to 1:10) wave climates do not support larger than 1:7 scale tests. Lager scales too expensive to test for this level of readiness. Solutions: Accept imperfection while assuring data is sufficient (marginally met at Nyquist rate) Mount AWAC on a mid column buoy to increase frequency response. Monitor data from AWAC through acoustic modem to WEC and then to shore Post process time series data into spectral format using in-house code

16. 16 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date Evaluating 1:7 scale wave data Regions where shipping traffic produces relatively large waves introduce post processing requirements not normally associated with tank testing or utility scale ocean testing scenarios. Solutions: Creative post processing Data collection requirements (frequency and quantity) Prototype test requirements exceed those expected for a final utility application. Data collection and storage for prototype testing requires very high reliability. Solutions: Not satisfied with dSpace/PC based solution used this time, alternatives are under investigation

17. 17 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Next Steps  Continue deployed testing & determine when data is sufficient Daily monitoring, post processing, WEC battery charges, AWAC servicing  WEC Recovery Remove all equipment  Data Analysis  Commercial design integration  Final report