1. FIGURE-8 TIRE ABRASION TEST Overview This vehicle test evaluates 5 sets of tires selected from a larger group of 12 tire brands in 185/70R14 size. These 5 tire sets had tread and belt designs that each demonstrated distinct component combinations. The figure-8 test is an on-vehicle test utilizing forces derived from vehicle mass, speed, and turning radius to apply abrasive side forces to the front tires. Instrumentation Utilized: Walking meter Laser Non-Contacting Thermometer Digital Camera Video Camera 4-Way Tire Wrench Floor Jack Test Site and Conditions: Huntsville, AL Drag way paved asphalt parking lot. Date: 4/28/06 Drivers: Heath Dorning and Troy Cottles Vehicle: 1999 Honda Civic 2Dr. Tire inflation pressures: 30 PSI front/29 PSI rear Honda 14”x5.5” rims Figure-8 dimensions: Each loop ~25’ x ~15’ outer radius with ~30’ transition. Vehicle ballasts: LF=200#, RF=150#, LR=150#, RR=100#. Full throttle in 2 nd gear. Test Tire Sets: Set 1—Cooper Lifeliner SLE Set 2—Dunlop SP20FE Set 3—Federal 735 Set 4—Uniroyal Tiger Paw Set 5—Bridgestone B700AQ

2. Object of Research The object of this research is to evaluate tires for abrasion resistance and heat generation when exposed to the figure-8 test protocol. Experimental Profile Five tire sets of the same size were evaluated on the same day, on same surface, and using the same test vehicle over a Figure-8 pattern marked by cones. All tires were 185/70R14 size. Tires were available in full vehicle sets, but upon completion of the third round, it was apparent that the rear tires were not experiencing any significant abrasion and the third test set’s rear tires were left on the test vehicle throughout the rest of the evaluations (replacing front tires only) in the interest of time. At the onset of the test, consideration was given to running the tires to abrasion failure and air-out. For this reason, the first set was run beyond the point of belt end exposure. During testing of the first tire set, a determination was made not to run to failure, in order to protect the test rims and tires. The point of initial belt exposure was noted in each case. As a result, the final appearance of Set 1tire sections does not represent their initial exposure appearance. 1.LF#64, RF#63: Cooper Lifeliner SLE, 185/70R14 88T, plant code: U9 (U.S. for North America), cure code: 4405, 4305. 2.LF#74, RF#75: Dunlop SP20Fe, P185/70R14 87S, plant code: M6 (U.S. for North America), cure code: 0505, 0505. 3.LF# 77, RF#80: Federal Supersteel 735, 185/70R14 88T, plant code: 2E (China for North America), cure code: 4705, 4705. 4.LF#71, RF#72: Uniroyal Tiger Paw, P185/70R14 87S, plant code: K4 (Mexico for North America), cure code: 3305, 3305. 5.LF#88, RF#87: Bridgestone B700AQ, 185/70R14 88T, plant code: 2R (Indonesia for Middle East), cure code: 4905, 4905. Vehicle alignment was checked to be on specification. Set 1 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, no belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 2 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, 1x2 wires, belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 3 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, no belt wedges, nylon edge bands. Set 4 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, large belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 5 featured: a tread cap, no tread base, two steel belts, belt wedges, nylon cap plies.

3. Vehicle Figure 8 Test Types of tread/belt designs to be evaluated Cooper Lifeliner SLE Dunlop SP20FE 1x2 wire Uniroyal TigerPaw Federal 735 Bridgestone B700AQ Set 1 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, no belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 2 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, 1x2 wires, belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 3 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, no belt wedges, nylon edge bands. Set 4 featured: a tread cap, a tread base, two steel belts, large belt wedges, no nylon cap plies. Set 5 featured: a tread cap, no tread base, two steel belts, belt wedges, nylon cap plies.

4. Test Results Results:Max Heat Build Up Avg. Set Heat Build UpLaps to Belt Exposure Set 1(Cooper)245 degrees F204 degrees F90 Set 2(Dunlop)256 degrees F217 degrees F90 Set 3(Federal)239 degrees F215 degrees F180 Set 4(Uniroyal)258 degrees F205 degrees F90 Set 5(B’stone)265 degrees F233 degrees F70 (nylon exposure); 170

5. (Vehicle Figure-8 Test) LocationHuntsville Dragway Date:4-28-06 Set#12345 Tire Brand/TypeCooper Lifeliner SLEDunlop SP20FEFederal 735Uniroyal Tiger PawBridgestone B700AQ Time9:30am10:30am11:30am12:30pm2:00pm3:00pm Ambient Temp.62degrees71 degrees83 degrees84 degrees83 degrees Surface Temp.62 degrees87 degrees92 degrees112 degrees110 degrees Weather Conditionsclear, sunny Front Tire PositionLFRFLFRFLFRFLFRFLFRF Front Tire #s#64#63#74#75#77#80#71#72#88#87 Tire Temps:Set 3 Rear Tires T5130 134186169178114108137131 T10148168193198181192168111198205 T20175183193229207240228200215235 T30190186211221211229243239220237 T40198196217231221210215208225220 T50194207219286207213258243257253 T60222214200217211234215235260235 T70210228231243217237215199254235 T80220229218256235223 225256253 T90 *214230220230227219221235265258 T100197233218229254259 T110208232222221250282 T120219226219236242235 T130220246218229236234 T140206219212 224 T150219232220221241231 T160200221234226 T170221212231226 T180217213 T190205233 T200208213 T210203214 *point of belt exposure Average Tire Temps198210203.6229.7211219.5210200233.2777778232 Average of LF and RF Averages204216.65215205.15232.7222222 Rank Order Of Temp. (Low to High) TempLapsLaps to belt exposure Cooper Lifeliner SLE120415090 Uniroyal Tiger Paw220590 Federal 7353215210180 Dunlop SP20FE421790 Bridgestone B700AQ5233170 Rank Order Of Laps to Exposure (High to Low) Federal 7351 Bridgestone B700AQ2 Cooper Lifeliner SLE/Uniroyal Tiger Paw/Dunlop SP20FE3

6. Conclusions 1.Recognizing that there are rubber compounding, construction, tread pattern, and profile influences involved in how a particular tire manages side forces, efforts were made to isolate as many additional variables as possible by completing the testing within the same day, using the same OE rims, inflating to the same inflation pressure, marking the same course, and testing on the same vehicle and under the same vehicle loads. 2.There was only a 26 degree range of max heat build-up among the 5 sets of tires, and a 29 degree range for the average of the front tires of each set. 3.Sets 1, 2, and 4 had no nylon cap plies. These sets all began exposing steel belts in the tread shoulder area at 90 laps. 4.Set 3 featured nylon edge bands. This tire exposed steel belts in the tread shoulder area at 180 laps. 5.Set 5 featured a nylon cap ply. This tire exposed nylon at 70 laps, but did not expose steel belts in the tread shoulder area until 170 laps. 6.Rank order for laps to exposure of steel belts was as follows: Federal > Bridgestone > Cooper=Uniroyal=Dunlop. 7.Application of a nylon belt cover appears to improve tread area rigidity and reduce tread shoulder distortion during aggressive maneuvers.